文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

脉冲电磁场疗法治疗腰椎手术后慢性疼痛的评估:一项前瞻性、双盲、随机、假对照临床试验。

Evaluation of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy for the treatment of chronic postoperative pain following lumbar surgery: a pilot, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial.

作者信息

Sorrell Robert Gordon, Muhlenfeld Jamie, Moffett John, Stevens Gary, Kesten Steven

机构信息

Alabama Orthopedic Center, Birmingham, AL, USA.

Regenesis Biomedical Inc., Scottsdale, AZ, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2018 Jun 22;11:1209-1222. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S164303. eCollection 2018.


DOI:10.2147/JPR.S164303
PMID:29950893
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6018879/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence of chronic postoperative pain following lumbar spinal surgery has increased with the overall increase in the prevalence of lumbar surgery. This study was conducted to evaluate the analgesic effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy in subjects with persistent pain following lumbar surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, multicenter study in 36 subjects with persistent low-back and/or radiating leg pain after lumbar surgery was conducted. Eligible subjects were randomized (1:1:1) to receive one of two doses of therapy (42-μs or 38-μs pulse width) or treatment with a sham device. Subjects self-treated twice daily for 60 days. The primary end point was change in pain intensity (∆PI) using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale between average baseline (Days -5 to -1) and end of treatment (Days 56-60) for lumbar and radiating leg pain. Secondary outcome measures included the Oswestry Disability Index, Beck Depression Inventory-II, Patient Global Impression of Change, and consumption of analgesics. RESULTS: Low-back pain scores for the 42-μs group decreased by 40.2% ( = 0.028), compared to 18.6% for the 38-μs pulse width group ( = 0.037) and 25.6% for the sham group ( = 0.013 per protocol population). Average leg pain scores decreased by 45.0% (42 μs, = 0.009), 17.0% (38 μs, = 0.293), and 24.5% (sham, = 0.065). The proportion of subjects responding to therapy, time to 30% reduction in pain scores, and Patient Global Impression of Change were improved with the PEMF 42-μs device over the sham control, although results were associated with -values >0.05. CONCLUSION: PEMF therapy (42-μs pulse width) was associated with trends for a reduction in pain, compared to sham treatment. Secondary endpoints were consistent with an overall beneficial effect of the PEMF 42-μs pulse width device.

摘要

背景:随着腰椎手术总体患病率的上升,腰椎手术后慢性疼痛的发生率也有所增加。本研究旨在评估脉冲电磁场(PEMF)疗法对腰椎手术后持续疼痛患者的镇痛效果。 患者与方法:对36例腰椎手术后持续存在腰背部和/或腿部放射性疼痛的患者进行了一项随机、双盲、假对照、多中心研究。符合条件的受试者被随机分配(1:1:1)接受两种剂量疗法之一(脉冲宽度为42微秒或38微秒)或使用假装置进行治疗。受试者每天自行治疗两次,持续60天。主要终点是使用数字疼痛评分量表评估腰椎和腿部放射性疼痛在平均基线(第-5天至-1天)和治疗结束(第56 - 60天)之间的疼痛强度变化(∆PI)。次要结局指标包括奥斯威斯利残疾指数、贝克抑郁量表第二版、患者整体变化印象以及镇痛药的消耗量。 结果:42微秒组的腰背痛评分下降了40.2%(P = 0.028),相比之下,38微秒脉冲宽度组下降了18.6%(P = 0.037),假治疗组下降了25.6%(按方案人群P = 0.013)。腿部平均疼痛评分下降了45.0%(42微秒,P = 0.009)、17.0%(38微秒,P = 0.293)和24.5%(假治疗组,P = 0.065)。与假对照相比,使用42微秒PEMF装置治疗的受试者对治疗有反应的比例、疼痛评分降低30%的时间以及患者整体变化印象均有所改善,尽管结果的P值>0.05。 结论:与假治疗相比,PEMF疗法(42微秒脉冲宽度)有疼痛减轻的趋势。次要终点与42微秒脉冲宽度PEMF装置的总体有益效果一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8c7/6018879/451419ba7be3/jpr-11-1209Fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8c7/6018879/deb827dc16f9/jpr-11-1209Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8c7/6018879/20de10afe974/jpr-11-1209Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8c7/6018879/c00476ba8c9f/jpr-11-1209Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8c7/6018879/57e33dc10e58/jpr-11-1209Fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8c7/6018879/451419ba7be3/jpr-11-1209Fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8c7/6018879/deb827dc16f9/jpr-11-1209Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8c7/6018879/20de10afe974/jpr-11-1209Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8c7/6018879/c00476ba8c9f/jpr-11-1209Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8c7/6018879/57e33dc10e58/jpr-11-1209Fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8c7/6018879/451419ba7be3/jpr-11-1209Fig5.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Evaluation of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy for the treatment of chronic postoperative pain following lumbar surgery: a pilot, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial.

J Pain Res. 2018-6-22

[2]
An open-label pilot study of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome pain.

Int Med Case Rep J. 2014-12-31

[3]
Effectiveness of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study.

Pain Physician. 2021-1

[4]
Effect of pulsed electromagnetic field on nonspecific low back pain patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Braz J Phys Ther. 2018-8-21

[5]
A Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy Device for Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Pain Ther. 2019-6

[6]
Effect of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy on experimental pain: A double-blind, randomized study in healthy young adults.

Electromagn Biol Med. 2016

[7]
Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields for Postsurgical Pain Management in Women Undergoing Cesarean Section: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Trial.

Clin J Pain. 2017-2

[8]
Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Stimulation in Lumbar Spine Fusion for Patients With Risk Factors for Pseudarthrosis.

Int J Spine Surg. 2023-12-26

[9]
Efficacy of Pulsed Low-Frequency Magnetic Field Therapy on Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Asian Spine J. 2020-2

[10]
Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on postoperative pain: a double-blind randomized pilot study in breast augmentation patients.

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008-7

引用本文的文献

[1]
Treatment modalities for patients with Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type II: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Commun Med (Lond). 2025-3-5

[2]
Smartphone administered pulsed radio frequency energy therapy for expedited cutaneous wound healing.

NPJ Digit Med. 2025-2-15

[3]
Pulsing Addition to Modulated Electro-Hyperthermia.

Bioengineering (Basel). 2024-7-17

[4]
Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Stimulation in Lumbar Spine Fusion for Patients With Risk Factors for Pseudarthrosis.

Int J Spine Surg. 2023-12-26

[5]
Assessing the Effects of Pulsed Electromagnetic Therapy on Painful Diabetic Distal Symmetric Peripheral Neuropathy: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025-3

[6]
Neuromodulation for Pain Management in the Inpatient Setting: A Narrative Review.

Cureus. 2021-3-15

[7]
Efficacy of silver needle therapy for the treatment of chronic nonspecific low back pain: a prospective, single-center, randomized, parallel-controlled clinical trial.

Trials. 2021-1-21

[8]
Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation (rPMS) in Subjects With Lumbar Radiculopathy: An Electromyography-guided Prospective, Randomized Study.

In Vivo. 2021

[9]
Emerging and Adjunctive Therapies for Spinal Cord Injury Following Acute Canine Intervertebral Disc Herniation.

Front Vet Sci. 2020-10-15

[10]
Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Inhibits Synovitis via Enhancing the Efferocytosis of Macrophages.

Biomed Res Int. 2020

本文引用的文献

[1]
Failed back surgery syndrome: current perspectives.

J Pain Res. 2016-11-7

[2]
Pain in the management of opioid use disorder.

J Pain Res. 2016-11-4

[3]
The hardest thing to see is what is in front of your eyes - quo vadis placebo analgesia?

J Pain Res. 2016-10-14

[4]
Response: High Frequency (10 kHz) or Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Patients With Predominant Back Pain: Preliminary Data From a Prospective Observational Study.

Neuromodulation. 2016-10

[5]
Spinal Cord Stimulation Modulates Gene Expression in the Spinal Cord of an Animal Model of Peripheral Nerve Injury.

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016

[6]
A review of spinal cord stimulation systems for chronic pain.

J Pain Res. 2016-7-1

[7]
Genomics of the Effect of Spinal Cord Stimulation on an Animal Model of Neuropathic Pain.

Neuromodulation. 2016-8

[8]
Failed back surgery syndrome: review and new hypotheses.

J Pain Res. 2016-1-12

[9]
Effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Spinal Pain: A Systematic Review.

Pain Physician. 2016-1

[10]
Failed back (surgery) syndrome: time for a paradigm shift.

Br J Pain. 2013-2

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索