Suppr超能文献

医疗保健组织的效率评估:使用了哪些模型?

Efficiency measurement of health care organizations: What models are used?

作者信息

Jaafaripooyan Ebrahim, Emamgholipour Sara, Raei Behzad

机构信息

Department of Management Sciences and Health Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2017 Dec 16;31:86. doi: 10.14196/mjiri.31.86. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Literature abounds with various techniques for efficiency measurement of health care organizations (HCOs), which should be used cautiously and appropriately. The present study aimed at discovering the rules regulating the interplay among the number of inputs, outputs, and decision- making units (DMUs) and identifying all methods used for the measurement of Iranian HCOs and critically appraising all DEA studies on Iranian HCOs in their application of such rules. The present study employed a systematic search of all studies related to efficiency measurement of Iranian HCOs. A search was conducted in different databases such as PubMed and Scopus between 2001 and 2015 to identify the studies related to the measurement in health care. The retrieved studies passed through a multi-stage (title, abstract, body) filtering process. Data extraction table for each study was completed and included method, number of inputs and outputs, DMUs, and their efficiency score. Various methods were found for efficiency measurement. Overall, 122 studies were retrieved, of which 73 had exclusively employed DEA technique for measuring the efficiency of HCOs in Iran, and 23 with hybrid models (including DEA). Only 6 studies had explicitly used the rules of thumb. The number of inputs, outputs, and DMUs should be cautiously selected in DEA like techniques, as their proportionality can directly affect the discriminatory power of the technique. The given literature seemed to be, to a large extent, unsuccessful in attending to such proportionality. This study collected a list of key rules (of thumb) on the interplay of inputs, outputs, and DMUs, which could be considered by most researchers keen to apply DEA technique.

摘要

文献中充斥着各种用于衡量医疗保健组织(HCOs)效率的技术,使用时应谨慎且恰当。本研究旨在发现调节投入数量、产出数量和决策单元(DMUs)之间相互作用的规则,并识别用于衡量伊朗HCOs的所有方法,以及批判性地评估所有关于伊朗HCOs的数据包络分析(DEA)研究在应用这些规则方面的情况。本研究对所有与伊朗HCOs效率衡量相关的研究进行了系统检索。在2001年至2015年期间,在PubMed和Scopus等不同数据库中进行了检索,以识别与医疗保健衡量相关的研究。检索到的研究经过多阶段(标题、摘要、正文)筛选过程。为每项研究完成了数据提取表,包括方法、投入和产出数量、DMUs及其效率得分。发现了多种效率衡量方法。总体而言,检索到122项研究,其中73项专门采用DEA技术来衡量伊朗HCOs的效率,23项采用混合模型(包括DEA)。只有6项研究明确使用了经验法则。在类似DEA的技术中,应谨慎选择投入、产出和DMUs的数量,因为它们的比例会直接影响该技术的辨别力。给定的文献在很大程度上似乎未能关注到这种比例关系。本研究收集了一份关于投入、产出和DMUs相互作用的关键规则(经验法则)清单,大多数热衷于应用DEA技术的研究人员可以参考。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验