Samut Pınar Kaya
Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.
J Healthc Manag. 2023;68(5):356-375. doi: 10.1097/JHM-D-22-00086.
Instead of considering many variables for the accurate measurement of healthcare efficiency, working with the select few variables that really affect efficiency will provide more accurate efficiency scores. In addition, calculating the efficiency by weighting the inputs and outputs according to their effect and severity levels will give more realistic results. In this article, a three-step hybrid system with a two-stage CCA (canonical correlation analysis)-DEA/AR (data envelopment analysis/assurance region) model is proposed to obtain results of health efficiency.
Healthcare efficiency studies conducted between 2000 and 2020 were reviewed. In this examination of the input and output variables used in the DEA of 63 previous studies, the 6 inputs and 5 outputs preferred by previous researchers were determined. Afterward, the health efficiency scores of countries represented in the research were calculated with weight-restricted DEA, and CCA was used for a priori statistical analysis in determining the weights. Thus, in this analysis of the preferred outputs and inputs with the help of CCA to estimate the relationship between multiple input and output sets, the variables that had no effect were eliminated and the ones that had an effect were included in DEA/AR with their degree of effectiveness.
For the model proposed here, three inputs and three outputs were identified by following a five-item variable reduction procedure. The numbers of doctors and nurses were identified as the most effective inputs, and infant mortality rates were found to be the most effective outputs. Therefore, health efficiency scores obtained with the proposed CCA-DEA/AR model and the basic DEA are presented together. A review of the results found fewer health-efficient countries with the weight-restricted DEA. This is proof that weighting the variables into the DEA increases the discriminating power of the method.
By applying the proposed model, healthcare administrators can analyze healthcare efficiency accurately and thus improve efficiency by transferring limited resources to the right places according to deficiencies or surpluses identified by the model's inputs. Resources can be allocated at both private and public hospitals in a way that increases healthcare efficiency outputs.
为了准确衡量医疗效率,无需考虑众多变量,而是使用真正影响效率的少数几个变量将能提供更准确的效率得分。此外,根据投入和产出的影响程度及严重程度进行加权来计算效率,将得出更符合实际的结果。本文提出了一种具有两阶段典型相关分析(CCA)-数据包络分析/保证区域(DEA/AR)模型的三步混合系统,以获得健康效率结果。
对2000年至2020年间进行的医疗效率研究进行了综述。在对之前63项研究的DEA中使用的投入和产出变量进行此次审查时,确定了先前研究人员偏爱的6个投入和5个产出。随后,使用权重受限的DEA计算研究中所代表国家的健康效率得分,并使用CCA进行先验统计分析以确定权重。因此,在借助CCA对偏爱的产出和投入进行此次分析以估计多个投入和产出集之间的关系时,消除了无影响的变量,并将有影响的变量及其有效程度纳入DEA/AR。
对于本文提出的模型,通过遵循五项变量约简程序确定了三个投入和三个产出。医生和护士数量被确定为最有效的投入,婴儿死亡率被发现是最有效的产出。因此,将所提出的CCA-DEA/AR模型和基本DEA获得健康效率得分一并呈现。对结果的审查发现,权重受限的DEA得出的健康高效国家较少。这证明将变量纳入DEA进行加权会提高该方法的区分能力。
通过应用所提出的模型,医疗管理人员可以准确分析医疗效率,从而根据模型投入所确定的不足或过剩情况,将有限资源转移到合适的地方来提高效率。资源可以以提高医疗效率产出的方式在私立和公立医院进行分配。