• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性胰腺炎腹内高压、预后与修订的亚特兰大分类法及基于决定因素的分类法之间的关系

Relationship between intra-abdominal hypertension, outcome and the revised Atlanta and determinant-based classifications in acute pancreatitis.

作者信息

Marcos-Neira P, Zubia-Olaskoaga F, López-Cuenca S, Bordejé-Laguna L

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital Barcelona Spain.

Department of Intensive Care Donostia - San Sebastián University Hospital Guipúzcoa Spain.

出版信息

BJS Open. 2018 Mar 15;1(6):175-181. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.29. eCollection 2017 Dec.

DOI:10.1002/bjs5.29
PMID:29951620
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5989946/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to analyse the relationship between intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and severity of acute pancreatitis (AP) measured by the revised Atlanta classification (RAC) and determinant-based classification (DBC). Secondary objectives were to assess IAH as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in the ICU.

METHODS

This prospective international observational study included patients admitted to the ICU with AP and at least one organ failure. Information was collected on demographics, severity scores at admission using RAC and DBC, organ failure, mechanical ventilation, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), surgery and mortality. Maximum intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) during ICU stay was used for analysis.

RESULTS

Some 374 patients were included. The hospital mortality rate was 28·9 per cent. IAP was measured in 301 patients (80·5 per cent), of whom 274 (91·0 per cent) had IAH and 103 (34·2 per cent) acute compartment syndrome. A higher IAH grade was more likely in patients with severe AP (42 per cent for grade I versus 84 per cent for grade IV) and acute critical pancreatitis (9 versus 25 per cent; P = 0·001). Compared with grade I IAH, patients with grade IV had more infected necrosis (16 versus 28 per cent; P = 0·005), need for surgery (27 versus 50 per cent; P = 0·006), mechanical ventilation (53 versus 84 per cent; P = 0·007) and requirement for CRRT (22 versus 66 per cent; P < 0·001). IAH predicted shock (area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) 0·79, 95 per cent c.i. 0·73 to 0·84), respiratory failure (AUC 0·82, 0·77 to 0·87), renal failure (AUC 0·93, 0·89 to 0·96) and mortality (AUC 0·89, 0·86 to 0·93).

CONCLUSION

IAH was associated with severity of AP classified according to both RAC and DBC systems. IAP grade can predict outcome of AP during ICU stay.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在分析腹内高压(IAH)与根据修订的亚特兰大分类法(RAC)和基于决定因素的分类法(DBC)所测定的急性胰腺炎(AP)严重程度之间的关系。次要目标是评估IAH作为重症监护病房(ICU)发病率和死亡率预测指标的情况。

方法

这项前瞻性国际观察性研究纳入了入住ICU且患有AP并至少出现一种器官功能衰竭的患者。收集了患者的人口统计学信息、入院时使用RAC和DBC的严重程度评分、器官功能衰竭情况、机械通气、连续性肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)、手术及死亡率等信息。分析时采用ICU住院期间的最高腹内压(IAP)。

结果

共纳入约374例患者。医院死亡率为28.9%。对301例患者(80.5%)进行了IAP测量,其中274例(91.0%)患有IAH,103例(34.2%)患有急性筋膜间室综合征。重症AP患者(I级为42%,IV级为84%)和急性重症胰腺炎患者(分别为9%和25%;P = 0.001)更易出现较高等级的IAH。与I级IAH患者相比,IV级患者有更多感染性坏死(分别为16%和28%;P = 0.005)、需要手术(分别为27%和50%;P = 0.006)、机械通气(分别为53%和84%;P = 0.007)以及需要CRRT(分别为22%和66%;P < 0.001)。IAH可预测休克(受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)下面积(AUC)为0.79,95%置信区间为0.73至0.84)、呼吸衰竭(AUC为0.82,0.77至0.87)、肾衰竭(AUC为0.93,0.89至0.96)和死亡率(AUC为0.89,0.86至0.93)。

结论

IAH与根据RAC和DBC系统分类的AP严重程度相关。IAP分级可预测ICU住院期间AP的预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b86/5989946/f504445b662b/BJS5-1-175-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b86/5989946/c0a1be21d04a/BJS5-1-175-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b86/5989946/f504445b662b/BJS5-1-175-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b86/5989946/c0a1be21d04a/BJS5-1-175-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b86/5989946/f504445b662b/BJS5-1-175-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Relationship between intra-abdominal hypertension, outcome and the revised Atlanta and determinant-based classifications in acute pancreatitis.急性胰腺炎腹内高压、预后与修订的亚特兰大分类法及基于决定因素的分类法之间的关系
BJS Open. 2018 Mar 15;1(6):175-181. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.29. eCollection 2017 Dec.
2
Value of the revised Atlanta classification (RAC) and determinant-based classification (DBC) systems in the evaluation of acute pancreatitis.修订版亚特兰大分类(RAC)和基于决定因素的分类(DBC)系统在评估急性胰腺炎中的价值。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Jul;34(7):1231-1238. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1389705. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
3
Intra-abdominal hypertension in patients with severe acute pancreatitis.重症急性胰腺炎患者的腹腔内高压
Crit Care. 2005 Aug;9(4):R452-7. doi: 10.1186/cc3754. Epub 2005 Jul 6.
4
Performance of the revised Atlanta and determinant-based classifications for severity in acute pancreatitis.修订后的亚特兰大分类和基于决定因素的分类在急性胰腺炎严重程度评估中的表现。
Br J Surg. 2016 Mar;103(4):427-33. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10088. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
5
Abdominal compartment syndrome in patients with severe acute pancreatitis in early stage.早期重症急性胰腺炎患者的腹腔间隔室综合征
World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jun 14;14(22):3541-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.3541.
6
[A comparison between the revision of Atlanta classification and determinant-based classification in acute pancreatitis].[急性胰腺炎中亚特兰大分类修订版与基于决定因素的分类的比较]
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Dec 1;56(12):909-913. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1426.2017.12.004.
7
Revised Atlanta classification and determinant-based classification: Which one better at stratifying outcomes of patients with acute pancreatitis?修订后的亚特兰大分类法和基于决定因素的分类法:哪一种在对急性胰腺炎患者的预后进行分层方面更具优势?
Pancreatology. 2017 Mar-Apr;17(2):194-200. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
8
Computed tomography features predictive of intra-abdominal hypertension in acute necrotizing pancreatitis:  A prospective study.计算机断层扫描特征预测急性坏死性胰腺炎的腹腔内高压:一项前瞻性研究。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jun;40(3):326-332. doi: 10.1007/s12664-021-01149-9. Epub 2021 May 21.
9
Association between severity and the determinant-based classification, Atlanta 2012 and Atlanta 1992, in acute pancreatitis: a clinical retrospective study.急性胰腺炎中严重程度与基于决定因素的分类(2012年亚特兰大分类和1992年亚特兰大分类)之间的关联:一项临床回顾性研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Apr;94(13):e638. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000638.
10
Reduction of intra-abdominal pressure after percutaneous catheter drainage of pancreatic fluid collection predicts survival.经皮穿刺导管引流胰腺液积聚后降低腹内压可预测生存。
Pancreatology. 2020 Jun;20(4):772-777. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.04.012. Epub 2020 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of acute pancreatitis in the "no man's land".“无人区”急性胰腺炎的管理
Intern Emerg Med. 2025 Apr 6. doi: 10.1007/s11739-025-03916-4.
2
Intra-abdominal Hypertension Is a Strong Predictor of Mortality and Poor Clinical Outcome in Severe Acute Pancreatitis.腹腔内高压是重症急性胰腺炎死亡率和不良临床结局的强预测指标。
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Mar;70(3):1233-1245. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08749-3. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
3
[Management of acute pancreatitis in the emergency department and the intensive care unit].[急诊科与重症监护病房中急性胰腺炎的管理]

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting the Prognosis of Acute Pancreatitis.预测急性胰腺炎的预后
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Oct 4;165(7):523-524. doi: 10.7326/M16-1581. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
2
Prediction Models of Mortality in Acute Pancreatitis in Adults: A Systematic Review.成人急性胰腺炎死亡率预测模型:系统综述。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Oct 4;165(7):482-490. doi: 10.7326/M16-0650. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
3
Abdominal Compartment Syndrome and Intra-abdominal Ischemia in Patients with Severe Acute Pancreatitis.重症急性胰腺炎患者的腹腔间隔室综合征与腹腔内缺血
Anaesthesiologie. 2024 Jul;73(7):490-498. doi: 10.1007/s00101-024-01431-3.
4
[Management of acute pancreatitis in the emergency department and the intensive care unit].[急诊科和重症监护病房中急性胰腺炎的管理]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2024 Mar;119(2):156-164. doi: 10.1007/s00063-023-01104-w. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
5
Abdominal compartment syndrome in critically ill patients.危重症患者的腹腔间隔室综合征
Acute Crit Care. 2023 Nov;38(4):399-408. doi: 10.4266/acc.2023.01263. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
6
Ten tips to manage severe acute pancreatitis in an intensive care unit.在重症监护病房管理重症急性胰腺炎的十条建议。
Intensive Care Med. 2023 Sep;49(9):1127-1130. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07121-9. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
7
Intra-Abdominal Hypertension: A Systemic Complication of Severe Acute Pancreatitis.腹腔内高压:重症急性胰腺炎的一种全身并发症。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Jun 10;58(6):785. doi: 10.3390/medicina58060785.
8
Management of Severe Acute Pancreatitis.重症急性胰腺炎的管理
Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2020;18(4):670-681. doi: 10.1007/s11938-020-00322-x. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
World J Surg. 2016 Jun;40(6):1454-61. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3388-7.
4
Comparison Between Revised Atlanta Classification and Determinant-Based Classification for Acute Pancreatitis in Intensive Care Medicine. Why Do Not Use a Modified Determinant-Based Classification?重症医学中急性胰腺炎的修订版亚特兰大分类法与基于决定因素的分类法之比较。为何不采用改良的基于决定因素的分类法?
Crit Care Med. 2016 May;44(5):910-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001565.
5
Abdominal compartment syndrome in acute pancreatitis: a systematic review.急性胰腺炎中的腹腔间隔室综合征:一项系统评价
Pancreas. 2014 Jul;43(5):665-74. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000108.
6
Observational study of intra-abdominal pressure monitoring in acute pancreatitis.急性胰腺炎腹腔内压力监测的观察性研究
Surgery. 2014 May;155(5):910-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.028. Epub 2013 Dec 28.
7
A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis on intra-abdominal hypertension in critically ill patients: the wake-up project. World initiative on Abdominal Hypertension Epidemiology, a Unifying Project (WAKE-Up!).危重症患者腹腔内高压的系统评价和个体患者数据荟萃分析:唤醒项目。腹腔高压流行病学全球倡议,一个统一项目(唤醒!)
Minerva Anestesiol. 2014 Mar;80(3):293-306. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
8
Acute pancreatitis.急性胰腺炎
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014 Apr;20(2):189-95. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000068.
9
Risk factors for intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome among adult intensive care unit patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.成年重症监护病房患者腹内高压和腹腔间隔室综合征的危险因素:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2013 Oct 21;17(5):R249. doi: 10.1186/cc13075.
10
Validation of the determinant-based classification and revision of the Atlanta classification systems for acute pancreatitis.基于分类的判定标准的确证和急性胰腺炎亚特兰大分类系统的修订。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Feb;12(2):311-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.07.042. Epub 2013 Aug 16.