• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估 SAVRY 和 YLS/CMI 在涉及司法的胎儿酒精谱系障碍青年中的预测有效性。

An evaluation of the predictive validity of the SAVRY and YLS/CMI in justice-involved youth with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Guelph.

Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2018 Dec;30(12):1640-1651. doi: 10.1037/pas0000612. Epub 2018 Jun 28.

DOI:10.1037/pas0000612
PMID:29952591
Abstract

Despite the high prevalence of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) in youth criminal justice settings, there is currently no research supporting the use of violence risk assessment tools in this population. This study examined the predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) and the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (YLS/CMI) in justice-involved youth with FASD. Participants were 100 justice-involved youth (ages 12-23; 81% male), including 50 diagnosed with FASD and 50 without FASD or prenatal alcohol exposure. The SAVRY and YLS/CMI were prospectively coded based on interview and file review, with recidivism (both any and violent specifically) coded 1-year post-baseline assessment. Results provide preliminary support for the validity of the SAVRY and YLS/CMI in predicting recidivism in justice-involved youth with FASD. Higher ratings across SAVRY and YLS/CMI domains were found in youth with FASD, underscoring a critical need for assessments and interventions to buffer recidivism risk and address clinical needs. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

尽管胎儿酒精谱系障碍(FASD)在青年刑事司法环境中高发,但目前尚无研究支持在该人群中使用暴力风险评估工具。本研究考察了青少年暴力风险结构化评估量表(SAVRY)和青少年量刑/个案管理量表(YLS/CMI)在 FASD 涉案青少年中的预测效度。参与者为 100 名涉案青少年(年龄 12-23 岁;81%为男性),其中 50 名被诊断为 FASD,50 名无 FASD 或产前酒精暴露。SAVRY 和 YLS/CMI 根据访谈和档案审查进行前瞻性编码,以 1 年基线评估后的累犯(包括任何累犯和暴力累犯)为编码。结果初步支持 SAVRY 和 YLS/CMI 在预测 FASD 涉案青少年累犯方面的有效性。在 FASD 青少年中发现 SAVRY 和 YLS/CMI 各领域的评分较高,这突出表明需要进行评估和干预,以缓冲累犯风险并满足临床需求。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2018 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
An evaluation of the predictive validity of the SAVRY and YLS/CMI in justice-involved youth with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder.评估 SAVRY 和 YLS/CMI 在涉及司法的胎儿酒精谱系障碍青年中的预测有效性。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Dec;30(12):1640-1651. doi: 10.1037/pas0000612. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
2
Are adolescent risk assessment tools sensitive to change? A framework and examination of the SAVRY and the YLS/CMI.青少年风险评估工具是否敏感于变化?SAVRY 和 YLS/CMI 的框架和检验。
Law Hum Behav. 2017 Jun;41(3):244-257. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000238. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
3
Predictive validity of the SAVRY, YLS/CMI, and PCL:YV is poor for intimate partner violence perpetration among adolescent offenders.SAVRY、YLS/CMI 和 PCL:YV 对青少年罪犯实施亲密伴侣暴力的预测效度较差。
Law Hum Behav. 2022 Jun;46(3):189-200. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000483. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
4
Predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) with Indigenous and Caucasian female and male adolescents on probation.《青少年结构化暴力风险评估量表(SAVRY)对在押的土著和白种男女青少年的预测效度》
Psychol Assess. 2020 Jun;32(6):594-607. doi: 10.1037/pas0000816. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
5
The Predictive Validity of Savry Ratings for Assessing Youth Offenders in Singapore: A Comparison With YLS/CMI Ratings.新加坡萨夫里评估量表对青少年罪犯评估的预测效度:与青年司法筛选问卷/青少年犯罪多水平量表评估的比较
Crim Justice Behav. 2016 Jun;43(6):793-810. doi: 10.1177/0093854815616842. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
6
Are risk assessments racially biased?: Field study of the SAVRY and YLS/CMI in probation.风险评估存在种族偏见吗?:缓刑中SAVRY和YLS/CMI的实地研究。
Psychol Assess. 2017 Jun;29(6):664-678. doi: 10.1037/pas0000445.
7
Validation of the YLS/CMI on an Australian Juvenile Offending Population.《青少年法律与量刑量表(YLS/CMI)》在澳大利亚青少年犯罪人群中的效度验证
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2023 Jun;67(8):861-883. doi: 10.1177/0306624X221086556. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
8
Predictive validity of risk assessments in juvenile offenders: Comparing the SAVRY, PCL:YV, and YLS/CMI with unstructured clinical assessments.青少年罪犯风险评估的预测效度:将精算少年暴力风险评估工具(SAVRY)、青年版心理变态量表(PCL:YV)和青少年服务与案件管理清单(YLS/CMI)与非结构化临床评估进行比较
Assessment. 2014 Jun;21(3):324-39. doi: 10.1177/1073191113498113. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
9
Predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) among a sample of Asian Canadian youth on probation.对在押亚裔加拿大青年样本中使用青少年暴力风险结构化评估量表(SAVRY)进行预测的有效性。
Law Hum Behav. 2020 Dec;44(6):485-501. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000431.
10
Predicting risk of recidivism in Spanish young offenders: Comparative analysis of the SAVRY and YLS/CMI.预测西班牙年轻罪犯再犯风险:SAVRY 和 YLS/CMI 的比较分析。
Psicothema. 2020 May;32(2):221-228. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2019.275.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring offending characteristics of young people with foetal alcohol spectrum disorder in Western Australia.探索西澳大利亚州患有胎儿酒精谱系障碍的年轻人的犯罪特征。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2022 Jun 13;30(4):514-535. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2022.2059028. eCollection 2023.
2
Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder and Risk-Need-Responsivity Model: A guide for criminal justice and forensic mental health professionals.胎儿酒精谱系障碍与风险-需求-反应性模型:刑事司法和法医精神健康专业人员指南
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 27;13:689837. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.689837. eCollection 2022.
3
Understanding the Relationship between Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) and Criminal Justice: A Systematic Review.
理解胎儿酒精谱系障碍(FASD)与刑事司法之间的关系:一项系统综述。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jan 2;10(1):84. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10010084.
4
Risk, rights and deservedness: Navigating the tensions of Gladue, Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder and settler colonialism in Canadian courts.风险、权利和应得:在加拿大法院中应对格劳德、胎儿酒精谱系障碍和殖民主义的紧张关系。
Behav Sci Law. 2022 Feb;40(1):14-30. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2536. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
5
Prevalence and characteristics of adults with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder in corrections: a Canadian case ascertainment study.在管教机构中具有胎儿酒精谱系障碍的成年人的流行率和特征:加拿大病例确定研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jan 9;19(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6292-x.