Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University.
Law Hum Behav. 2022 Jun;46(3):189-200. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000483. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
Despite advances in developing structured risk assessment instruments, there is currently no instrument to assess and manage the risk of intimate partner violence perpetration among adolescents. Given the empirical link between many forms of antisocial behavior, we tested whether structured tools commonly used by professionals to evaluate adolescents' risk of engaging in general violence and offending could be used to identify adolescents at risk for perpetrating intimate partner violence.
Because researchers have not yet examined whether risk assessment tools for general violence and offending predict intimate partner violence perpetration, we did not have a priori hypotheses regarding the predictive validity of these tools for this purpose.
Research assistants rated 156 adjudicated youth on the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY), Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (YLS/CMI), and Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version (PCL:YV) and recorded charges for intimate partner violence perpetration, any violent reoffending, and any reoffending over a 2-year follow-up period.
Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that total scores and summary risk ratings on the SAVRY and YLS/CMI and total scores on the PCL:YV were significantly predictive of any violent reoffending and any reoffending, with moderate to large effect sizes, but were nonsignificantly associated with intimate partner violence perpetration. Further, penalized logistic regression analysis indicated that the SAVRY, YLS/CMI, and PCL:YV did not significantly add incremental validity to age, gender, race/ethnicity, and prior intimate partner violence perpetration and victimization for predicting future intimate partner violence perpetration.
These findings suggest that the SAVRY, YLS/CMI, and PCL:YV could have limitations for assessing and managing intimate partner violence perpetration among adolescents. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
尽管在开发结构化风险评估工具方面取得了进展,但目前尚无工具可评估和管理青少年实施亲密伴侣暴力的风险。鉴于许多形式的反社会行为之间存在实证联系,我们测试了专业人员用于评估青少年普遍暴力和犯罪风险的结构化工具是否可用于识别有实施亲密伴侣暴力风险的青少年。
由于研究人员尚未研究一般暴力和犯罪风险评估工具是否可以预测亲密伴侣暴力的实施,因此我们对于这些工具在这方面的预测有效性没有先验假设。
研究助理对 156 名被判有罪的青少年进行了青少年暴力风险结构化评估 (SAVRY)、青少年服务/案件管理清单 (YLS/CMI) 和青少年心理病理检查表 (PCL:YV) 的评估,并记录了亲密伴侣暴力实施、任何暴力再犯罪和任何再犯罪的指控,随访时间为 2 年。
受试者工作特征分析表明,SAVRY 和 YLS/CMI 的总分和综合风险评分以及 PCL:YV 的总分与任何暴力再犯罪和任何再犯罪显著相关,具有中等至较大的效应量,但与亲密伴侣暴力实施无显著相关。此外,惩罚逻辑回归分析表明,SAVRY、YLS/CMI 和 PCL:YV 对于预测未来亲密伴侣暴力实施,不能显著增加年龄、性别、种族/民族和先前亲密伴侣暴力实施和受害情况的增量有效性。
这些发现表明,SAVRY、YLS/CMI 和 PCL:YV 可能在评估和管理青少年亲密伴侣暴力方面存在局限性。(PsycInfo数据库记录 (c) 2022 APA,保留所有权利)。