Soltis Kathryn E, Acuff Samuel F, Dennhardt Ashley A, Borsari Brian, Martens Matthew P, Murphy James G
Department of Psychology, University of Memphis.
Mental Health Service (116B), San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2018 Aug;26(4):347-353. doi: 10.1037/pha0000213. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
Behavioral economic theory suggests that increased engagement in constructive, substance-free activities that are in the service of long-term goals (e.g., college graduation, career development, health) can decrease alcohol use and related problems. However, engaging in activities such as these in the high-risk college environment requires the ability to self-regulate by avoiding rewarding but risky behaviors (e.g., drinking) while also effectively organizing behavior in the pursuit of delayed academic and career-related rewards. The current secondary data analyses evaluated self-regulation as a potential mechanism of behavior change in an alcohol intervention trial that compared a standard alcohol-focused brief motivational intervention (BMI) plus a behavioral economic substance-free activity session (SFAS) with an alcohol BMI plus relaxation training (reaction time [RT]) session (Murphy et al., 2012). Participants were 82 first-year undergraduate students (50% women; Mage = 18.5, SD = .71) who reported 2 or more past-month heavy drinking episodes. After completing a baseline assessment and an individual alcohol-focused BMI, participants were randomized to either the SFAS or the RT session. The BMI + SFAS condition reported greater mean self-regulation at 1 month compared with BMI + RT. Furthermore, self-regulation at 1 month significantly mediated the relation between condition and alcohol-related outcomes at 6-month follow-up. Although preliminary, these results suggest that brief behavioral economic intervention elements that an attempt to increase future goal pursuit and substance-free activities can enhance the short-term efficacy of standard alcohol BMIs and that this effect may be due in part to increases in self-regulation. (PsycINFO Database Record
行为经济学理论表明,更多地参与有助于实现长期目标(如大学毕业、职业发展、健康)的建设性、无物质活动,可以减少酒精使用及相关问题。然而,在高风险的大学环境中参与此类活动,需要具备自我调节能力,即避免有回报但有风险的行为(如饮酒),同时还要有效地组织行为以追求延迟的学业和职业相关回报。当前的二次数据分析在一项酒精干预试验中评估了自我调节作为行为改变的潜在机制,该试验将标准的以酒精为重点的简短动机干预(BMI)加一次行为经济学无物质活动课程(SFAS)与酒精BMI加放松训练(反应时间[RT])课程进行了比较(墨菲等人,2012年)。参与者为82名一年级本科生(50%为女性;平均年龄=18.5岁,标准差=.71),他们报告在过去一个月中有2次或更多次重度饮酒事件。在完成基线评估和一次以酒精为重点的个体BMI后,参与者被随机分配到SFAS组或RT组。与BMI+RT组相比,BMI+SFAS组在1个月时报告的平均自我调节水平更高。此外,1个月时的自我调节在6个月随访时显著介导了分组与酒精相关结果之间的关系。尽管这些结果是初步的,但它们表明,试图增加对未来目标的追求和无物质活动的简短行为经济学干预元素,可以提高标准酒精BMI的短期疗效,而且这种效果可能部分归因于自我调节的增加。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》