• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《21 世纪治愈法案》对药物研发的潜在影响。

The Potential Effect of the 21st Century Cures Act on Drug Development.

机构信息

1 Baylor Scott & White Health, Temple, Texas, and University of Texas, Health Outcomes and Pharmacy Practice Division, Austin.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Jul;24(7):677-681. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.7.677.

DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.7.677
PMID:29952706
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10398162/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Enacted in December 2016, the 21st Century Cures Act is a pivotal piece of legislation that will influence the FDA drug and device approval process for the foreseeable future. Although this legislation received overwhelming support by members of Congress for much needed budgetary increases for the FDA and other national health organizations, there is much controversy over certain provisions that potentially diminish the robustness of the evidence base required for drug and medical device approvals. This article discusses the key provisions from "Title III - Development" under "Division A - 21st Century Cures" related to drug development and, specifically, explores those aspects that address patient-focused drug development, use of surrogate endpoints in clinical trials, modernization of trial design, and use of real-world evidence for decision making and health care economic information. In addition, specific legislation on regulatory changes is discussed pertaining to antimicrobial stewardship. Essentially, summarized interpretations are presented here of the provisions covering the aforementioned topics, along with insights into potential intended and unintended consequences for U.S. health care payers, health care providers, government entities, and product manufacturers.

DISCLOSURES

No outside funding supported this writing. Goble is completing fellowship training sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals.

摘要

未加标签

21 世纪治愈法案于 2016 年 12 月颁布,是一项具有重大意义的法规,将在可预见的未来影响 FDA 的药品和器械审批流程。尽管这项立法得到了国会议员的压倒性支持,为 FDA 和其他国家卫生组织提供了急需的预算增加,但其中一些条款存在争议,这些条款可能会削弱药品和医疗器械批准所需的证据基础的稳健性。本文讨论了“第 21 世纪治愈法案”的“发展”标题下“A 部分-21 世纪治愈”中的关键条款,这些条款与药物开发有关,特别是探讨了那些关注患者的药物开发、临床试验中替代终点的使用、试验设计的现代化以及真实世界证据在决策和医疗保健经济信息中的应用。此外,还讨论了与抗菌药物管理有关的监管改革的具体立法。本质上,本文对涵盖上述主题的条款进行了总结性解释,并深入探讨了这些条款对美国医疗保健支付者、医疗保健提供者、政府实体和产品制造商可能产生的预期和非预期影响。

披露

本文写作没有外部资金支持。Goble 正在接受诺华制药公司赞助的奖学金培训。

相似文献

1
The Potential Effect of the 21st Century Cures Act on Drug Development.《21 世纪治愈法案》对药物研发的潜在影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Jul;24(7):677-681. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.7.677.
2
AMCP Partnership Forum: Enabling the Exchange of Clinical and Economic Information Pre-FDA Approval.AMCP 合作论坛:在 FDA 批准前实现临床和经济信息的交流。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Jan;23(1):105-112. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.16366. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
3
Discrepancies Between FDA-Required Labeling and Evidence that Payers Cite in Drug Coverage Policies.FDA 要求的标签与支付方在药物覆盖政策中引用的证据之间的差异。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Dec;24(12):1240-1246. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.12.1240.
4
21st Century Cures Act-A Cure-All for Patients?《21世纪治愈法案》——患者的万灵药?
Am J Nurs. 2016 Jul;116(7):19-20. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000484926.27907.b4.
5
The 21st Century Cures Act--Will It Take Us Back in Time?《21世纪治愈法案》——它会让我们倒退吗?
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2473-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1506964. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
6
US 21st Century Cures Act secures health-care research funding.美国《21世纪治愈法案》确保了医疗保健研究资金。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jan;18(1):24. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30636-2. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
7
The 21st Century Cures Act: can the regulatory framework survive the "cures"?《21世纪治愈法案》:监管框架能否经受住“治愈”的考验?
Cad Saude Publica. 2015 Sep;31(9):1807-10. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XPE010915.
8
Experts split on 21st Century Cures Act.专家们对《21世纪治愈法案》意见不一。
Lancet Respir Med. 2015 Sep;3(9):676. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00330-6. Epub 2015 Aug 23.
9
Congress Considers Legislation on "21st Century Cures".国会审议关于“21世纪治愈法案”的立法。
Consult Pharm. 2015 Jul;30(7):424. doi: 10.4140/TCP.n.2015.424.
10
The 21st century cures act: Opportunities and challenges.《21世纪治愈法案》:机遇与挑战。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Dec;98(6):575-7. doi: 10.1002/cpt.208. Epub 2015 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
A national unmet needs assessment for CTSA-affiliated electronic health record data networks: A customer discovery approach.一项针对CTSA附属电子健康记录数据网络的全国性未满足需求评估:一种客户发现方法。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Oct 3;8(1):e137. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.609. eCollection 2024.
2
Do Physicians Have a Duty to Discuss Expanded Access to Investigational Drugs with their Patients? A Normative Analysis.医生是否有义务与患者讨论扩大对研究性药物的获取途径?一种规范分析。
J Law Med Ethics. 2023;51(1):172-180. doi: 10.1017/jme.2023.53. Epub 2023 May 25.
3
Regulations, Open Data and Healthcare Innovation: A Case of MSK-IMPACT and Its Implications for Better Cancer Care.法规、开放数据与医疗保健创新:以MSK-IMPACT为例及其对改善癌症护理的启示
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jul 9;13(14):3448. doi: 10.3390/cancers13143448.
4
Patient generated health data and electronic health record integration in oncologic surgery: A call for artificial intelligence and machine learning.患者生成的健康数据与电子健康记录在肿瘤外科中的整合:对人工智能和机器学习的呼吁。
J Surg Oncol. 2021 Jan;123(1):52-60. doi: 10.1002/jso.26232. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
5
Comparing Randomized Controlled Trials and Real-World Studies in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Pharmacotherapy.比较慢性阻塞性肺疾病药物治疗的随机对照试验和真实世界研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Jun 2;15:1225-1243. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S244942. eCollection 2020.
6
SMART Markers: collecting patient-generated health data as a standardized property of health information technology.智能标记:将患者生成的健康数据作为健康信息技术的标准化属性进行收集。
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Jan 23;3:9. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0218-6. eCollection 2020.
7
Ethics codes and use of new and innovative drugs.伦理学准则与新型创新药物的使用。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Mar;85(3):501-507. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13833. Epub 2019 Jan 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Reporting to Improve Reproducibility and Facilitate Validity Assessment for Healthcare Database Studies V1.0.提高医疗保健数据库研究的可重复性并促进有效性评估的报告V1.0
Value Health. 2017 Sep;20(8):1009-1022. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.08.3018. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
2
Good Practices for Real-World Data Studies of Treatment and/or Comparative Effectiveness: Recommendations from the Joint ISPOR-ISPE Special Task Force on Real-World Evidence in Health Care Decision Making.治疗和/或比较效果的真实世界数据研究的良好实践:医疗保健决策中真实世界证据联合ISPOR-ISPE特别工作组的建议。
Value Health. 2017 Sep;20(8):1003-1008. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.08.3019. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
3
Outcomes-Based Contracting Experience: Research Findings from U.S. and European Stakeholders.基于结果的合同经验:来自美国和欧洲利益相关者的研究结果。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Oct;23(10):1018-1026. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.10.1018.
4
Performance-Based Risk-Sharing Arrangements for Pharmaceutical Products in the United States: A Systematic Review.美国药品的基于绩效的风险分担安排:系统评价。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Oct;23(10):1028-1040. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.10.1028.
5
Using Performance-Based Risk-Sharing Arrangements to Address Uncertainty in Indication-Based Pricing.利用基于绩效的风险分担安排解决基于适应证定价的不确定性。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Oct;23(10):1010-1015. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.10.1010.
6
Performance-Based Risk-Sharing Arrangements: U.S. Payer Experience.基于绩效的风险分担安排:美国支付方的经验。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Oct;23(10):1042-1052. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.10.1042.
7
Changing the Way We Pay for Health Care: Is Value the New Plastic?改变医疗保健付费方式:价值是新的塑料吗?
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Oct;23(10):998-1002. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.10.998.
8
The 21st Century Cures Act: pharmacoeconomic boon or bane?《21世纪治愈法案》:药物经济学的福音还是祸根?
J Med Econ. 2017 Apr;20(4):315-317. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1282865. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
9
Interpretation of surrogate endpoints in the era of the 21st Century Cures Act.《21世纪治愈法案》时代替代终点的解读
BMJ. 2016 Dec 30;355:i6286. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6286.
10
Updating the American Society of Clinical Oncology Value Framework: Revisions and Reflections in Response to Comments Received.更新美国临床肿瘤学会价值框架:针对收到的评论进行的修订与思考
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug 20;34(24):2925-34. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.2518. Epub 2016 May 31.