Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
AIDS. 2018 Jul 1;32 Suppl 1:S93-S105. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001897.
As the burden of chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs) rises across sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), global donors and governments are exploring strategies to integrate HIV and NCD care. Implementation science is an emerging research paradigm that can help such programs achieve health impact at scale. We define implementation science as a systematic, scientific approach to ask and answer questions about how to deliver what works in populations who need it with greater speed, appropriate fidelity, efficiency, and relevant coverage. We identified achievements and gaps in the application of implementation science to HIV/NCD integration, developed an HIV/NCD implementation science research agenda, and detailed opportunities for capacity building and training.
We conducted a systematic review of the application of implementation science methods to integrated HIV/NCD programs in SSA.
We searched PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and EMBASE for evaluations of integrated programs in SSA reporting at least one implementation outcome.
We identified 31 eligible studies. We found that most studies used only qualitative, economic, or impact evaluation methods. Only one study used a theoretical framework for implementation science. Acceptability, feasibility, and penetration were the most frequently reported implementation outcomes. Adoption, appropriateness, cost, and fidelity were rare; sustainability was not evaluated.
Implementation science has a promising role in supporting HIV/NCD integration, although its impact will be limited unless theoretical frameworks, rigorous study designs, and reliable measures are employed. To help support use of implementation science, we need to build sustainable implementation science capacity. Doing so in SSA and supporting implementation science investigators can help expedite HIV/NCD integration.
随着撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)慢性非传染性疾病(NCD)负担的增加,全球捐助者和政府正在探索将艾滋病毒和 NCD 护理相结合的策略。实施科学是一种新兴的研究范例,可以帮助此类项目以更大的速度、适当的保真度、效率和相关覆盖范围实现健康影响。我们将实施科学定义为一种系统的、科学的方法,用于询问和回答如何在需要的人群中提供有效的方法,同时提高速度、适当的保真度、效率和相关覆盖率。我们确定了在将实施科学应用于艾滋病毒/NCD 整合方面的成就和差距,制定了艾滋病毒/NCD 实施科学研究议程,并详细说明了能力建设和培训的机会。
我们对实施科学方法在 SSA 中整合艾滋病毒/NCD 方案的应用进行了系统回顾。
我们在 PubMed、CINAHL、PsycINFO 和 EMBASE 中搜索了至少报告了一项实施结果的 SSA 综合项目的评估。
我们确定了 31 项符合条件的研究。我们发现,大多数研究仅使用定性、经济或影响评估方法。只有一项研究使用了实施科学的理论框架。可接受性、可行性和渗透度是报告最多的实施结果。采用、适当性、成本和保真度很少见;可持续性未进行评估。
尽管实施科学的影响将受到限制,除非采用理论框架、严格的研究设计和可靠的措施,但它在支持艾滋病毒/NCD 整合方面具有广阔的前景。为了帮助支持实施科学的应用,我们需要建立可持续的实施科学能力。在 SSA 中这样做并支持实施科学研究人员可以帮助加快艾滋病毒/NCD 整合。