Suppr超能文献

增强型体外反搏与跳深练习后的恢复。

Enhanced External Counterpulsation and Recovery From a Plyometric Exercise Bout.

机构信息

Physiology Unit, Systems Biology Department, University of Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.

Department of Sport and Health, Spanish Agency for Health Protection in Sport (AEPSAD), Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Clin J Sport Med. 2020 Jul;30(4):416-419. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000620.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effectiveness of enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) on recovery from exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD).

DESIGN

This study followed a crossover, placebo-controlled, counterbalanced design.

PARTICIPANTS

Ten healthy active subjects (7 male; 27 ± 4 years).

INTERVENTIONS

Participants performed a plyometric exercise bout (10 sets of 10 jumps interspersed with 1-minute rests) and were then assigned to recover for 30 minutes with either EECP (cuff pressure = 80 mm Hg) or a Sham intervention (0 mm Hg) immediately after exercise and at 24 hours after exercise. Two weeks later, they repeated the protocol with the other recovery intervention.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Muscle soreness, creatine kinase (CK) activity, jump performance, and tensiomyographic variables were measured before exercise, and 24 and 48 hours after exercise.

RESULTS

The mean jump height of the plyometric bout did not differ between EECP and Sham (P > 0.05). Exercise resulted in increased muscle soreness (P < 0.001) and CK levels (P < 0.001), as well as in impaired jump performance (P < 0.05). No changes were observed in tensiomyographic variables. No significant differences were found between interventions for any of the study outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

No benefits on recovery from EIMD after a plyometric exercise bout were observed with EECP.

摘要

目的

分析增强型体外反搏(EECP)对运动诱导的肌肉损伤(EIMD)恢复的效果。

设计

本研究采用交叉、安慰剂对照、平衡设计。

参与者

10 名健康活跃的受试者(7 名男性;27 ± 4 岁)。

干预

参与者进行了一次增强式跳跃练习(10 组 10 次跳跃,间隔 1 分钟休息),然后在运动后立即和运动后 24 小时,分别接受 EECP(袖口压力=80mmHg)或假干预(0mmHg)恢复 30 分钟。2 周后,他们用另一种恢复干预重复了该方案。

主要观察指标

肌肉酸痛、肌酸激酶(CK)活性、跳跃表现和张力肌描记变量在运动前、运动后 24 小时和 48 小时进行测量。

结果

EECP 和假干预组的增强式跳跃练习的平均跳跃高度无差异(P>0.05)。运动导致肌肉酸痛(P<0.001)和 CK 水平升高(P<0.001),以及跳跃表现受损(P<0.05)。张力肌描记变量没有变化。在任何研究结果中,干预之间均未观察到显著差异。

结论

在增强式跳跃练习后,EECP 对运动诱导的肌肉损伤恢复没有益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验