Physiology Unit, Systems Biology Department, University of Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.
Department of Sport and Health, Spanish Agency for Health Protection in Sport (AEPSAD), Madrid, Spain.
Clin J Sport Med. 2020 Jul;30(4):416-419. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000620.
To analyze the effectiveness of enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) on recovery from exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD).
This study followed a crossover, placebo-controlled, counterbalanced design.
Ten healthy active subjects (7 male; 27 ± 4 years).
Participants performed a plyometric exercise bout (10 sets of 10 jumps interspersed with 1-minute rests) and were then assigned to recover for 30 minutes with either EECP (cuff pressure = 80 mm Hg) or a Sham intervention (0 mm Hg) immediately after exercise and at 24 hours after exercise. Two weeks later, they repeated the protocol with the other recovery intervention.
Muscle soreness, creatine kinase (CK) activity, jump performance, and tensiomyographic variables were measured before exercise, and 24 and 48 hours after exercise.
The mean jump height of the plyometric bout did not differ between EECP and Sham (P > 0.05). Exercise resulted in increased muscle soreness (P < 0.001) and CK levels (P < 0.001), as well as in impaired jump performance (P < 0.05). No changes were observed in tensiomyographic variables. No significant differences were found between interventions for any of the study outcomes.
No benefits on recovery from EIMD after a plyometric exercise bout were observed with EECP.
分析增强型体外反搏(EECP)对运动诱导的肌肉损伤(EIMD)恢复的效果。
本研究采用交叉、安慰剂对照、平衡设计。
10 名健康活跃的受试者(7 名男性;27 ± 4 岁)。
参与者进行了一次增强式跳跃练习(10 组 10 次跳跃,间隔 1 分钟休息),然后在运动后立即和运动后 24 小时,分别接受 EECP(袖口压力=80mmHg)或假干预(0mmHg)恢复 30 分钟。2 周后,他们用另一种恢复干预重复了该方案。
肌肉酸痛、肌酸激酶(CK)活性、跳跃表现和张力肌描记变量在运动前、运动后 24 小时和 48 小时进行测量。
EECP 和假干预组的增强式跳跃练习的平均跳跃高度无差异(P>0.05)。运动导致肌肉酸痛(P<0.001)和 CK 水平升高(P<0.001),以及跳跃表现受损(P<0.05)。张力肌描记变量没有变化。在任何研究结果中,干预之间均未观察到显著差异。
在增强式跳跃练习后,EECP 对运动诱导的肌肉损伤恢复没有益处。