Suppr超能文献

运动贴扎治疗慢性非特异性下腰痛的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effectiveness of Kinesio Taping in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Masters and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, University City of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Department of Physical Therapy, Paulista University, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Jan 1;44(1):68-78. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002756.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of Kinesio Taping (KT) in patients with nonspecific low back pain.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

KT is widely used in patients with low back pain.

METHODS

We conducted searches on PubMed, EMBASE, PEDro, SciELO, and LILACS up to February 26, 2018. We included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults with chronic nonspecific low back pain that compared KT to no intervention or placebo as well as RCTs that compared KT combined with exercise against exercise alone. The methodological quality and statistical reporting of the eligible trials were measured by the 11-item PEDro scale. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE classification. We considered pain intensity and disability as the primary outcomes. Whenever possible, the data were pooled through meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 11 RCTs for this systematic review (pooled n = 743). Two clinical trials (pooled n = 100) compared KT to no intervention at the short-term follow-up. Four studies compared KT to placebo (pooled n = 287) at short-term follow-up and two trials (pooled n = 100) compared KT to placebo at intermediate-term follow-up. Five trials (pooled n = 296) compared KT combined with exercises or electrotherapy to exercises or spinal manipulation alone. No statistically significant difference was found for most comparisons.

CONCLUSION

Very low to moderate quality evidence shows that KT was no better than any other intervention for most the outcomes assessed in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. We found no evidence to support the use of KT in clinical practice for patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

摘要

研究设计

系统评价。

目的

研究肌内效贴布(KT)对非特异性下腰痛患者的疗效。

背景资料概要

KT 在腰痛患者中广泛应用。

方法

我们检索了 PubMed、EMBASE、PEDro、SciELO 和 LILACS 数据库,检索时间截至 2018 年 2 月 26 日。仅纳入了比较慢性非特异性下腰痛成人患者中 KT 与无干预或安慰剂的随机对照试验(RCT),以及 KT 联合运动与单纯运动比较的 RCT。通过 PEDro 量表的 11 项条目评估合格试验的方法学质量和统计报告。使用 GRADE 分类评估证据质量。我们将疼痛强度和残疾作为主要结局。只要可能,我们通过荟萃分析汇总数据。

结果

本系统评价共纳入 11 项 RCT(汇总 n=743)。两项临床试验(汇总 n=100)在短期随访时比较了 KT 与无干预。四项研究在短期随访时比较了 KT 与安慰剂(汇总 n=287),两项试验在中期随访时比较了 KT 与安慰剂(汇总 n=100)。五项试验(汇总 n=296)比较了 KT 联合运动或电疗与单纯运动或脊柱手法治疗。大多数比较均未发现统计学差异。

结论

证据质量为极低至中等,表明 KT 在慢性非特异性下腰痛患者的大多数结局评估中并不优于其他干预措施。我们未发现支持 KT 在慢性非特异性下腰痛患者的临床实践中应用的证据。

证据等级

1 级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验