Masters and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, University City of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Department of Physical Therapy, Paulista University, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Jan 1;44(1):68-78. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002756.
Systematic review.
To investigate the effects of Kinesio Taping (KT) in patients with nonspecific low back pain.
KT is widely used in patients with low back pain.
We conducted searches on PubMed, EMBASE, PEDro, SciELO, and LILACS up to February 26, 2018. We included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults with chronic nonspecific low back pain that compared KT to no intervention or placebo as well as RCTs that compared KT combined with exercise against exercise alone. The methodological quality and statistical reporting of the eligible trials were measured by the 11-item PEDro scale. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE classification. We considered pain intensity and disability as the primary outcomes. Whenever possible, the data were pooled through meta-analysis.
We identified 11 RCTs for this systematic review (pooled n = 743). Two clinical trials (pooled n = 100) compared KT to no intervention at the short-term follow-up. Four studies compared KT to placebo (pooled n = 287) at short-term follow-up and two trials (pooled n = 100) compared KT to placebo at intermediate-term follow-up. Five trials (pooled n = 296) compared KT combined with exercises or electrotherapy to exercises or spinal manipulation alone. No statistically significant difference was found for most comparisons.
Very low to moderate quality evidence shows that KT was no better than any other intervention for most the outcomes assessed in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. We found no evidence to support the use of KT in clinical practice for patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain.
系统评价。
研究肌内效贴布(KT)对非特异性下腰痛患者的疗效。
KT 在腰痛患者中广泛应用。
我们检索了 PubMed、EMBASE、PEDro、SciELO 和 LILACS 数据库,检索时间截至 2018 年 2 月 26 日。仅纳入了比较慢性非特异性下腰痛成人患者中 KT 与无干预或安慰剂的随机对照试验(RCT),以及 KT 联合运动与单纯运动比较的 RCT。通过 PEDro 量表的 11 项条目评估合格试验的方法学质量和统计报告。使用 GRADE 分类评估证据质量。我们将疼痛强度和残疾作为主要结局。只要可能,我们通过荟萃分析汇总数据。
本系统评价共纳入 11 项 RCT(汇总 n=743)。两项临床试验(汇总 n=100)在短期随访时比较了 KT 与无干预。四项研究在短期随访时比较了 KT 与安慰剂(汇总 n=287),两项试验在中期随访时比较了 KT 与安慰剂(汇总 n=100)。五项试验(汇总 n=296)比较了 KT 联合运动或电疗与单纯运动或脊柱手法治疗。大多数比较均未发现统计学差异。
证据质量为极低至中等,表明 KT 在慢性非特异性下腰痛患者的大多数结局评估中并不优于其他干预措施。我们未发现支持 KT 在慢性非特异性下腰痛患者的临床实践中应用的证据。
1 级。