• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

玻璃离子体和树脂改性玻璃离子体修复材料的线性热膨胀系数评估

Linear Coefficient of Thermal Expansion Evaluation of Glass Ionomer and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Restorative Materials.

作者信息

Pinto-Sinai G, Brewster J, Roberts H

出版信息

Oper Dent. 2018 Sep/Oct;43(5):E266-E272. doi: 10.2341/17-381-L. Epub 2018 Jun 28.

DOI:10.2341/17-381-L
PMID:29953342
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this evaluation was to evaluate the linear coefficient of thermal expansion (LCTE) of 12 conventional glass ionomer (GIC) and four resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) restorative materials.

METHODS

GIC and RMGI specimens (2 mm × 5 mm × 5 mm) were fabricated (n=12) following manufacturer instructions and were placed in 0.2M phosphate-buffered saline and stored at 37°C and 98% humidity for one week. Specimens had LCTE determined with a thermomechanical analysis (TMA) unit using a 15°C-50°C heating cycle as well as a 50°C-15°C cooling cycle at a 5°C/min rate, using a 3-mm ball-point probe under 0.02 N probe pressure with all specimens kept saturated with PBS using a specially designed quartz container. Each specimen was tested three times, with the mean representing the specimen LCTE. Mean results between specimen heating and cooling were compared with paired Wilcoxon sign rank test, while results between materials were compared with Kruskal-Wallis/Dunn's ( α=0.05).

RESULTS

GIC LCTE ranged from approximately 5°C to 20°C ppm °K, while the RMGI LCTE ranged from approximately 25°C to 47°C ppm °K. With some exception, the LCTE during cooling displayed a greater trend.

SIGNIFICANCE

Under moisture conditions similar to the oral cavity, GIC materials overall had LCTE values closer to that reported for tooth structure. RMGI materials displayed higher values, which was thought to be related to the amount of resin in the matrix. A generally greater LCTE trend with cooling for all materials was noted, but the small magnitude of the difference is presently thought to be of minor clinical significance.

摘要

目的

本评估旨在测定12种传统玻璃离子水门汀(GIC)和4种树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀(RMGI)修复材料的热膨胀线性系数(LCTE)。

方法

按照制造商说明制作GIC和RMGI样本(2毫米×5毫米×5毫米)(n = 12),将其置于0.2M磷酸盐缓冲盐水中,在37°C和98%湿度条件下储存一周。使用热机械分析仪(TMA)测定样本的LCTE,加热循环为15°C至50°C,冷却循环为50°C至15°C,速率为5°C/分钟,使用3毫米圆珠探针,探针压力为0.02 N,所有样本使用专门设计的石英容器保持在PBS中饱和状态。每个样本测试三次,平均值代表样本的LCTE。样本加热和冷却之间的平均结果采用配对Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行比较,材料之间的结果采用Kruskal-Wallis/Dunn检验(α = 0.05)。

结果

GIC的LCTE范围约为5°C至20°C ppm °K,而RMGI的LCTE范围约为25°C至47°C ppm °K。除了一些例外情况,冷却过程中的LCTE呈现出更大的趋势。

意义

在类似于口腔的湿度条件下,GIC材料的LCTE值总体上更接近牙齿结构的报告值。RMGI材料显示出更高的值,这被认为与基质中的树脂含量有关。注意到所有材料在冷却时LCTE总体上有更大的趋势,但目前认为差异幅度较小,临床意义不大。

相似文献

1
Linear Coefficient of Thermal Expansion Evaluation of Glass Ionomer and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Restorative Materials.玻璃离子体和树脂改性玻璃离子体修复材料的线性热膨胀系数评估
Oper Dent. 2018 Sep/Oct;43(5):E266-E272. doi: 10.2341/17-381-L. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
2
Physical property investigation of contemporary glass ionomer and resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.当代玻璃离子体和树脂改性玻璃离子体修复材料的物理性能研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Mar;23(3):1295-1308. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2554-3. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
3
Temperature-influenced dimensional change of different molar anatomical areas.不同磨牙解剖区域受温度影响的尺寸变化。
Arch Oral Biol. 2014 Dec;59(12):1312-5. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2014.08.001. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
4
Temperature mediated coefficient of dimensional change of dental tooth-colored restorative materials.温度介导的牙科牙齿颜色修复材料尺寸变化系数
Dent Mater. 2004 Jun;20(5):435-40. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2003.02.001.
5
Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.树脂改性玻璃离子体和复合树脂修复体的边缘微渗漏:使用酸蚀冲洗粘结剂和自酸蚀粘结剂的效果
Indian J Dent Res. 2012 May-Jun;23(3):378-83. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.102234.
6
Effect of postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer restorations at different delayed periods of exposure to carbamide peroxide.术后漂白对不同延迟暴露于过氧化脲时期的树脂复合材料和树脂改性玻璃离子修复体边缘渗漏的影响。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2009 Nov 1;10(6):E009-16.
7
Assessment of laminate technique using glass ionomer and resin composite for restoration of root filled teeth.评价使用玻璃离子水门汀和树脂复合材料进行根管治疗后牙齿修复的嵌体技术。
J Dent. 2012 Aug;40(8):617-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.04.006. Epub 2012 Apr 20.
8
Effect of various surface protections on the margin microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements.各种表面保护措施对树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀边缘微渗漏的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Sep;86(3):309-14. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.116133.
9
In vitro evaluation of a silica whitening toothpaste containing blue covarine on the colour of teeth containing anterior restoration materials.体外评价含蓝 covarine 二氧化硅美白牙膏对含有前牙修复材料的牙齿颜色的影响。
J Dent. 2017 Dec;67S:S29-S33. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.08.007. Epub 2017 Aug 19.
10
Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials.新型混合修复材料与传统玻璃离子和树脂复合修复材料的物理力学特性比较
J Dent Res. 1997 Apr;76(4):883-94. doi: 10.1177/00220345970760041001.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Performance of Glass Ionomer Cement in Load-Bearing Restorations: A Systematic Review.玻璃离聚物水泥在承重修复中的临床性能:系统评价。
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Feb 14;30:e943489. doi: 10.12659/MSM.943489.
2
Correlation between different methodologies used to evaluate the marginal adaptation of proximal dentin gingival margins elevated using a glass hybrid.使用玻璃离子水门汀复合体抬高近中牙本质龈缘后,不同方法评估其边缘适合性之间的相关性
Restor Dent Endod. 2022 Sep 3;47(4):e36. doi: 10.5395/rde.2022.47.e36. eCollection 2022 Nov.
3
Long-Term Hearing Results of Endoskeletal Ossicular Reconstruction in Chronic Ears Using Titanium Prostheses Having a Helical Coil: Part 1-Kraus K-Helix Crown, Incus to Stapes.
慢性耳中使用带螺旋线圈的钛假体进行内骨骼听小骨重建的长期听力结果:第 1 部分-Kraus K-螺旋冠、砧骨至镫骨。
Otol Neurotol. 2022 Oct 1;43(9):1056-1064. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003679. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
4
Survival rate of primary molar restorations is not influenced by hand mixed or encapsulated GIC: 24 months RCT.手混或胶囊型玻璃离子水门汀对乳磨牙修复体存活率的影响:24 个月 RCT。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Jul 23;21(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01710-0.
5
Evaluation of Marginal Adaptation and Microleakage of Three Glass Ionomer-Based Class V Restorations: In Vitro Study.三种玻璃离子基V类洞修复体边缘适合性及微渗漏的评估:体外研究
Eur J Dent. 2019 Oct;13(4):599-606. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3401435. Epub 2019 Dec 31.