Ernst Andreas, Lauridsen Lea Lykke B, Brix Nis, Kjersgaard Camilla, Olsen Jørn, Parner Erik T, Clausen Niels, Olsen Lars Henning, Ramlau-Hansen Cecilia H
Department of Public Health, Section for Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2018 Jul 26;31(7):763-772. doi: 10.1515/jpem-2018-0178.
Background We evaluated the inter-rater agreement between self-assessed Tanner staging and clinical examination and the intra-individual agreement of self-assessed information on various puberty markers in late adolescents from the longitudinal nationwide Puberty Cohort, a sub-cohort of the Danish National Birth Cohort (DNBC). Methods We invited 715 children from the ongoing Puberty Cohort between June 2016 and January 2017. In total, 366 children (51%) returned an add-on questionnaire identical to the questionnaire used to collect information on puberty markers, including Tanner staging, in the Puberty Cohort. Of these, 197 (54%) also participated in a clinical examination with Tanner staging. We used percentage agreement and weighted kappa statistics to evaluate the inter-rater and intra-individual agreement. Results Due to late entry, more than 75% of children were Tanner stage 4 or above at clinical examination. In girls, the inter-rater agreement for pubic hair and breast staging was 54% and 52%, respectively, yielding weighted kappas of fair strength. In boys, pubic hair and genital staging agreed in 55% and 33%, respectively, corresponding to weighted kappas of fair to moderate strength. Boys tended to underestimate genitalia staging consistently. The intra-individual agreement on Tanner staging was 75-77% in girls and 69% in boys, whereas the intra-individual agreement on axillary hair and acne was above 92%. Conclusions Self-assessment of late stages of pubertal development may be misclassified, leading to random errors in studies of puberty timing. However, self-assessment continues to serve as an important time- and cost-saving tool in large prospective puberty cohorts.
我们在全国纵向青春期队列(丹麦国家出生队列的一个子队列)的晚期青少年中,评估了自我评估的坦纳分期与临床检查之间的评分者间一致性,以及自我评估的各种青春期标志物信息的个体内一致性。
2016年6月至2017年1月期间,我们邀请了正在进行的青春期队列中的715名儿童。共有366名儿童(51%)返回了一份附加问卷,该问卷与用于在青春期队列中收集包括坦纳分期在内的青春期标志物信息的问卷相同。其中,197名儿童(54%)还参加了坦纳分期的临床检查。我们使用百分比一致性和加权kappa统计量来评估评分者间和个体内一致性。
由于进入队列较晚,超过75%的儿童在临床检查时处于坦纳4期或以上。在女孩中,阴毛和乳房分期的评分者间一致性分别为54%和52%,加权kappa强度为中等。在男孩中,阴毛和生殖器分期的一致性分别为55%和33%,对应加权kappa强度为中等至良好。男孩往往持续低估生殖器分期。女孩坦纳分期的个体内一致性为75%-77%,男孩为69%,而腋毛和痤疮的个体内一致性高于92%。
青春期发育晚期阶段的自我评估可能会被错误分类,导致青春期时间研究中出现随机误差。然而,在大型前瞻性青春期队列研究中,自我评估仍是一种重要的节省时间和成本的工具。