Department of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia.
Department of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia.
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 28;13(6):e0199511. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199511. eCollection 2018.
Both household food insecurity and household dietary diversity have been found reliable in describing the dietary intake of a population. However, it had not been proven as reliable instrument for assessing nutritional status of individuals in a clinical context. There has been a need for evidence on the validity of using proxy and easy dietary indicators for nutritional status.
A facility based cross sectional study design was employed on 423 people with HIV infection visiting all ART clinics in Bahir Dar, North Ethiopia. Nutritional status was determined by computing BMI. Food insecurity was assessed using household food insecurity access scale. Dietary diversity was measured using a tool adopted from Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project. Data were entered to Epidata version 3.1and analyzed by SPSS version 20. Reliability analysis, sensitivity and specificity analysis were determined.
The sensitivity of the household food insecurity access scale and dietary diversity score was 87.9% and 79.8%, respectively, while their specificity was 56.2% and 70.2%. The AUC at 95% CI for the household food insecurity access scale and household dietary diversity score were 73.4 (68.4-78.4) and 73.1 (68.1-78.2) while their cut of point that maximized their sensitivity and specificity was 1 and 6 respectively. Household food insecurity access scale and household dietary diversity score were found to be reliable tools with a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.926 and 0.799, respectively.
In assessing under nutrition among PLHIV especially in limited resource settings, both the household food insecurity access scale and household dietary diversity score were found valid and reliable proxy indicators for measuring nutritional status.
家庭食物不安全和家庭饮食多样性都被证明可以可靠地描述人群的饮食摄入情况。然而,在临床环境中,它还没有被证明是评估个体营养状况的可靠工具。因此,需要有证据表明使用代理和简单的饮食指标来评估营养状况是有效的。
采用基于机构的横断面研究设计,对 423 名在埃塞俄比亚北部巴赫达尔所有 ART 诊所就诊的 HIV 感染者进行了研究。营养状况通过计算 BMI 来确定。使用家庭食物不安全获取量表评估食物不安全情况。饮食多样性通过采用来自食品和营养技术援助项目的工具进行测量。数据输入到 Epidata 版本 3.1 并由 SPSS 版本 20 进行分析。进行了可靠性分析、敏感性和特异性分析。
家庭食物不安全获取量表和饮食多样性评分的敏感性分别为 87.9%和 79.8%,特异性分别为 56.2%和 70.2%。家庭食物不安全获取量表和家庭饮食多样性评分的 AUC 在 95%CI 中分别为 73.4(68.4-78.4)和 73.1(68.1-78.2),而最大灵敏度和特异性的截断值分别为 1 和 6。家庭食物不安全获取量表和家庭饮食多样性评分被认为是可靠的工具,其 Cronbach's Alpha 分别为 0.926 和 0.799。
在评估 PLHIV 中的营养不足情况,特别是在资源有限的环境中,家庭食物不安全获取量表和家庭饮食多样性评分都被证明是测量营养状况的有效和可靠的替代指标。