Tachihara Motoko, Tamura Daisuke, Kiriu Tatsunori, Tokunaga Shuntaro, Hatakeyama Yukihisa, Shinke Haruko, Nagano Tatsuya, Nakata Kyosuke, Hazeki Nobuko, Kamiryo Hiroshi, Kobayashi Kazuyuki, Nishimura Yoshihiro
Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Kobe J Med Sci. 2018 Mar 27;63(4):E99-E104.
Endobronchial ultrasonography and guide sheath (EBUS-GS) technique has high diagnostic yield in lung nodules. Virtual bronchoscopic navigation (VBN) can lead bronchoscope to the target bronchi. The aim of this prospective study was to compare the diagnostic yield of two bronchoscopic procedures: bronchoscopy under EBUS-GS and VBN with or without x-ray fluoroscopy in small peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs, ≤30mm) with apparent CT-bronchus sign.
31 patients with PPLs which had apparent CT-bronchus sign were randomly assigned to the X-ray or the non-X-ray groups (18 with and 13 without fluoroscopy) between September 1, 2012, and September 30, 2015. A bronchoscope was introduced into the target bronchus using the VBN system. Sites of specimen sampling were verified using EBUS-GS with or without fluoroscopy.
The overall diagnostic yield was 83.3% in the X-ray and 69.2% in the non-X-ray group. The diagnostic yield of malignancy was 88.2% and 81.8%, respectively. The duration of the examination and time elapsed until the first EBUS visualization were similar in the X-ray and the non-X-ray group (9.0 (5.8-20.) min vs 11.0 (5.3-17.3) min, and 2.5 (1.3-14.2) min vs 4.1 (1.4-8.1) min, respectively). The fluoroscopy exposure time was 3.7 (2.9-10.56) min. The only adverse event was mild pneumothorax in a patient from the non-X-ray group, who had consequent TBB under fluoroscopy.
There was a possibility that VBN-guided EBUS-transbronchial diagnosis without fluoroscopy might be equivalent to that under fluoroscopy. Further multi-center randomized study may be desired. (UMIN000008592).
支气管内超声及引导鞘管(EBUS-GS)技术对肺结节具有较高的诊断率。虚拟支气管镜导航(VBN)可引导支气管镜到达目标支气管。本前瞻性研究的目的是比较两种支气管镜检查方法对伴有明显CT支气管征的小外周肺病变(PPL,≤30mm)的诊断率:EBUS-GS引导下支气管镜检查与有无X线透视的VBN。
2012年9月1日至2015年9月30日期间,31例伴有明显CT支气管征的PPL患者被随机分为X线组或非X线组(18例有透视,13例无透视)。使用VBN系统将支气管镜插入目标支气管。使用有或无透视的EBUS-GS验证标本采样部位。
X线组的总体诊断率为83.3%,非X线组为69.2%。恶性肿瘤的诊断率分别为88.2%和81.8%。X线组和非X线组的检查持续时间和首次EBUS可视化前的时间相似(分别为9.0(5.8 - 20.)分钟对11.0(5.3 - 17.3)分钟,以及2.5(1.3 - 14.2)分钟对4.1(1.4 - 8.1)分钟)。透视暴露时间为3.7(2.9 - 10.56)分钟。唯一的不良事件是一名来自非X线组的患者发生轻度气胸,随后在透视下进行了经支气管活检。
无透视的VBN引导下EBUS经支气管诊断可能等同于有透视的情况。可能需要进一步的多中心随机研究。(UMIN000008592)