Wong Kara R, Nelson Leigh Anne, Elliott Ellie S R, Liu Yifei, Sommi Roger W, Winans Elizabeth A
PGY-2 Psychiatric Pharmacy Residency Program Director, Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota,
Associate Professor, Division of Pharmacy Practice and Administration, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Pharmacy, Kansas City, Missouri; Clinical Pharmacist, Center for Behavioral Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri.
Ment Health Clin. 2016 Mar 8;6(1):1-7. doi: 10.9740/mhc.2016.01.001. eCollection 2016 Jan.
This study assesses the utilization of antipsychotic therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and describes characteristics of appropriate and inappropriate TDM at a state psychiatric hospital.
A retrospective, descriptive review was conducted for antipsychotic TDM completed between December 1, 2009, and June 30, 2011, at a 65-bed adult inpatient extended-care and forensic state psychiatric hospital.
One hundred thirty-three (n = 133) antipsychotic serum levels were collected from 44 patients during the study period. Sixty-nine percent (69%) of the TDM were deemed inappropriate, 28% were appropriate, and 3% could not be designated appropriate or inappropriate owing to the lack of information regarding steady-state conditions. The primary reason for inappropriate TDM was lack of documentation with regard to the indication for TDM (n = 79, 59.3%), the intervention following laboratory analysis (n = 88, 66%), or both. Appropriate TDM was associated with a lower laboratory cost for antipsychotic serum level ($48.98 ± $53.49 versus $72.06 ± $51.02, .05), lower daily cost of scheduled psychiatric medications ($17.72 ± $23.03 versus $32.26 ± $31.05, .05), lower daily cost of total medications ($19.28 ± $24.91 versus $33.82 ± $31.03, .05), fewer scheduled psychiatric medications (2.95 ± 1.90 versus 4.04 ± 2.19, .01), and fewer total scheduled medications (5.95 ± 3.60 versus 7.60 ± 3.29, .05). Inappropriate TDM led to approximately $6,753 in avoidable laboratory costs over a 20-month period.
Therapeutic drug monitoring is a complex process with many points at which errors may occur. The majority of antipsychotic levels at this state psychiatric hospital were not documented in a way that was clinically useful. Inappropriate TDM was associated with increased laboratory and medication costs.
本研究评估了抗精神病药物治疗药物监测(TDM)的应用情况,并描述了一家州立精神病医院中合理与不合理TDM的特征。
对2009年12月1日至2011年6月30日期间在一家拥有65张床位的成人住院康复及法医鉴定州立精神病医院完成的抗精神病药物TDM进行回顾性描述性分析。
在研究期间,从44名患者中采集了133份抗精神病药物血清水平样本。69%的TDM被认为不合理,28%合理,3%因缺乏稳态条件信息而无法判定是否合理。不合理TDM的主要原因是缺乏关于TDM指征的记录(n = 79,59.3%)、实验室分析后的干预措施记录(n = 88,66%)或两者皆无。合理的TDM与较低的抗精神病药物血清水平实验室成本相关(48.98美元±53.49美元对72.06美元±51.02美元,P <.05)、较低的定期精神科药物每日成本(17.72美元±23.03美元对32.26美元±31.05美元,P <.05)、较低的总药物每日成本(19.28美元±24.91美元对33.82美元±31.03美元,P <.05)、较少的定期精神科药物数量(2.95±1.90对4.04±2.19,P <.01)以及较少的总定期药物数量(5.95±3.60对7.60±3.29,P <.05)。在20个月的时间里,不合理的TDM导致了约6753美元的可避免实验室成本。
治疗药物监测是一个复杂的过程,在许多环节都可能出现错误。这家州立精神病医院的大多数抗精神病药物水平记录在临床上并无用处。不合理的TDM与实验室和药物成本增加相关。