Mohamed Nequesha S, Gwam Chukwuweike U, Etcheson Jennifer I, George Nicole E, Piuzzi Nicolas S, Rosas Samuel, Sohdi Nipun, Sultan Assem A, Khlopas Anton, Delanois Ronald E
Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopaedics, Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Ann Transl Med. 2018 Apr;6(7):114. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.03.02.
With increased legislative efforts to utilize evidence-based medicine as a guide for clinical practice, orthopaedists feel increasing pressure to publish research in higher-quality journals that reach a larger audience. Impact factor (IF) is used to quantify and rank journal apparent quality, and is the most standardized method for journal appraisal. In this study, we assessed the trends for IF among orthopaedic journals and compared these trends to those of medicine and general surgery journals.
Journal IFs from () between the years 2010 to 2016 were obtained and analyzed for trends. Only journals that were considered primarily orthopaedic journals were included. The top 10 journals by IF in both internal medicine and surgery were also included for comparison. Each journal was analyzed by IF, and trends across time were noted. The differences in mean IF between orthopaedic specialty groups were analyzed using an independent samples -test.
The mean IF of orthopaedic increased from 1.4 (range, 0.0-3.9) in 2010 to 1.9 (range, 0.5-5.7) in 2016. In 2016, the percentage of English journals increased to 87.3% (n=48), while the percentage of journals published in the United States was 47.3% (n=26). There was a significant difference between the IF of journals published in English and those published in other languages (P=0.004). The mean IF of both general and specialized orthopaedic journals increased from 2010 to 2016, but the difference was nonsignificant. The mean IF of the top 10 journals in both surgery and internal medicine also increased from 2010 to 2016, but the increase was also nonsignificant.
Overall, the mean IF for peer-reviewed orthopaedic journals has increased in the past years, as has the number of journals. English journals from the United States continue to have the largest impact when compared to non-English journals and journals from outside the United States. Future studies should aim to better qualify journal impact, while limiting confounders such as self-citation.
随着利用循证医学作为临床实践指南的立法努力不断增加,骨科医生感到在更高质量、受众更广的期刊上发表研究的压力越来越大。影响因子(IF)用于量化和排名期刊的表观质量,是评估期刊最标准化的方法。在本研究中,我们评估了骨科期刊的影响因子趋势,并将这些趋势与医学和普通外科期刊的趋势进行了比较。
获取并分析了2010年至2016年间(此处年份缺失)的期刊影响因子以研究趋势。仅纳入主要被视为骨科期刊的杂志。还纳入了内科和外科领域影响因子排名前十的期刊进行比较。对每种期刊按影响因子进行分析,并记录随时间的趋势。使用独立样本检验分析骨科专业组之间平均影响因子的差异。
骨科期刊的平均影响因子从2010年的1.4(范围0.0 - 3.9)增至2016年的1.9(范围0.5 - 5.7)。2016年,英文期刊的比例增至87.3%(n = 48),而在美国出版的期刊比例为47.3%(n = 26)。英文期刊与其他语言期刊的影响因子存在显著差异(P = 0.004)。从2010年到2016年,普通骨科期刊和专业骨科期刊的平均影响因子均有所增加,但差异不显著。2010年到2016年,外科和内科领域排名前十的期刊的平均影响因子也有所增加,但增幅也不显著。
总体而言,过去几年同行评审骨科期刊的平均影响因子有所增加,期刊数量也有所增加。与非英文期刊和美国以外国家的期刊相比,美国的英文期刊影响力仍然最大。未来的研究应旨在更好地界定期刊影响力,同时限制诸如自引等混杂因素。