Suppr超能文献

坦桑尼亚MFFAPP功效研究方案:用于粮食援助的新配方挤压强化混合食品

The MFFAPP Tanzania Efficacy Study Protocol: Newly Formulated, Extruded, Fortified Blended Foods for Food Aid.

作者信息

Delimont Nicole M, Chanadang Sirichat, Joseph Michael V, Rockler Briana E, Guo Qingbin, Regier Gregory K, Mulford Michael R, Kayanda Rosemary, Range Mwita, Mziray Zidiheri, Jonas Ambaksye, Mugyabuso Joseph, Msuya Wences, Lilja Nina K, Procter Sandra B, Chambers Edgar, Alavi Sajid, Lindshield Brian L

机构信息

Department of Food, Nutrition, Dietetics, and Health.

Department of Grain Science.

出版信息

Curr Dev Nutr. 2017 Apr 25;1(5):e000315. doi: 10.3945/cdn.116.000315. eCollection 2017 May.

Abstract

Fortified blended foods (FBFs) are micronutrient-fortified blends of milled cereals and pulses that represent the most commonly distributed micronutrient-fortified food aid. FBFs have been criticized due to lack of efficacy in treating undernutrition, and it has also been suggested that alternative commodities, such as sorghum and cowpea, be investigated instead of corn and soybean. The Micronutrient Fortified Food Aid Pilot Project (MFFAPP) Tanzania efficacy study was the culmination of economic, processing, sensory, and nutrition FBF research and development. MFFAPP Tanzania was a 20-wk, partially randomized cluster design conducted between February and July 2016 that enrolled children aged 6-53 mo in the Mara region of Tanzania with weight-for-height scores >-3 and hemoglobin concentrations <10.3 mg/dL. The intervention was complementary feeding of newly formulated, extruded FBFs (white sorghum cowpea variety 1, white sorghum-cowpea variety 2, red sorghum-cowpea, white sorghum-soy blend, and corn-soy blend 14) compared with Corn Soy Blend Plus (CSB+), a current US Agency for International Development-distributed corn-soy blend, and a no-FBF-receiving control. Screened participants ( = 2050) were stratified by age group (6-23 and 24-53 mo) and allocated to 1 of 7 FBF clusters provided biweekly. Biochemical and anthropometric data were measured every 10 wk at weeks 0, 10, and 20. The primary objectives of this study were to determine whether newly formulated, extruded corn-, soy-, sorghum-, and cowpea-based FBFs result in equivalent vitamin A or iron outcomes compared with CSB+. Changes in anthropometric outcomes were also examined. Results from the MFFAPP Tanzania Efficacy Study will inform food aid producers and distributers about whether extruded sorghum- and cowpea-based FBFs are viable options for improving the health of the undernourished. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02847962.

摘要

强化混合食品(FBFs)是经过微量营养素强化的碾磨谷物和豆类的混合物,是最常见的分发的微量营养素强化食品援助。由于在治疗营养不良方面缺乏疗效,FBFs受到了批评,也有人建议研究替代商品,如高粱和豇豆,而不是玉米和大豆。坦桑尼亚微量营养素强化食品援助试点项目(MFFAPP)的功效研究是经济、加工、感官和营养FBF研发的 culmination。MFFAPP坦桑尼亚项目是一项为期20周的部分随机整群设计,于2016年2月至7月进行,招募了坦桑尼亚马拉地区6至53个月大、身高别体重得分>-3且血红蛋白浓度<10.3mg/dL的儿童。干预措施是对新配方的挤压FBFs(白高粱-豇豆品种1、白高粱-豇豆品种2、红高粱-豇豆、白高粱-大豆混合物和玉米-大豆混合物14)进行补充喂养,与美国国际开发署目前分发的玉米-大豆混合物玉米大豆混合加剂(CSB+)以及不接受FBF的对照组进行比较。筛选出的参与者(=2050)按年龄组(6至23个月和24至53个月)分层,并分配到每两周提供一次的7个FBF组中的1个。在第0、10和20周每10周测量一次生化和人体测量数据。本研究的主要目的是确定新配方的挤压玉米、大豆、高粱和豇豆基FBFs与CSB+相比是否能产生同等的维生素A或铁结果。还检查了人体测量结果的变化。MFFAPP坦桑尼亚功效研究的结果将告知食品援助生产商和分销商,基于挤压高粱和豇豆的FBFs是否是改善营养不良者健康的可行选择。该试验已在clinicaltrials.gov上注册,注册号为NCT02847962。 (注:“culmination”此处似有误,未准确翻译,可根据实际修正为“最终成果”之类更合适的表述 )

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b24e/5998342/ec919db7f4cf/cdn000315fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验