• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学教师对教师发展计划的看法。

Perceptions of Medical Teachers on the Faculty Development Programme.

作者信息

Mythili S V, Elizabeth Arul Amutha

出版信息

Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 2016 Jan-Mar;60(1):96-101.

PMID:29956902
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medical Council of India (MCI) insists on the training of Medical Teachers in Medical Education Technologies (MET). The need for such a training is debated by many teachers. Hence this study is taken up to analyse its benefits.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Seven batches of medical teachers from a private Medical College Hospital underwent a three day training in the basics of MET, as per the guidelines of MCI. Pretest and post test for evaluation and feedback on usefullness were obtained from the participants.

RESULTS & DISCUSSION: The results analysed with the statistical Graphpad Prism6 software showed a significantly high post test marks 7.09/10±1.395 (mean±SD) compared to the pretest marks 2.184/10±1.019. (P value < 0.0001). Feedback in the Likertscale format from more than 95% of the participants also pronounced the usefulness of the programme.

CONCLUSION

The statistically significant post test marks and the Feedback (Likertscale) from the participants vouch for the necessity of the training.

摘要

背景

印度医学委员会(MCI)坚持对医学教师进行医学教育技术(MET)培训。许多教师对这种培训的必要性存在争议。因此,开展本研究以分析其益处。

对象与方法

按照MCI的指导方针,来自一所私立医学院附属医院的七批医学教师接受了为期三天的MET基础知识培训。从参与者那里获得了用于评估和反馈实用性的预测试和后测试。

结果与讨论

使用统计软件Graphpad Prism6分析结果显示,与预测试成绩2.184/10±1.019相比,后测试成绩显著更高,为7.09/10±1.395(均值±标准差)。(P值<0.0001)。超过95%的参与者以李克特量表形式给出的反馈也表明该培训计划很有用。

结论

后测试成绩具有统计学意义,且参与者的反馈(李克特量表)证明了培训的必要性。

相似文献

1
Perceptions of Medical Teachers on the Faculty Development Programme.医学教师对教师发展计划的看法。
Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 2016 Jan-Mar;60(1):96-101.
2
Faculty development and medical education units in India: a survey.印度的教师发展与医学教育单位:一项调查
Natl Med J India. 2009 Jan-Feb;22(1):28-32.
3
Medical Council of India's Amended Qualifications for Indian Medical Teachers: Well Intended, yet Half-hearted.印度医学委员会对印度医学教师资格的修订:初衷良好,但不够坚决。
Indian Pediatr. 2018 Feb 15;55(2):107-110. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
4
Is MCI over emphasising publication for promotion of medical teachers?轻度认知障碍是否过度强调发表论文以促进医学教师的晋升?
Indian J Med Ethics. 2017 Apr-Jun;2(2):131-132. doi: 10.20529/ijme.2017.034.
5
An evaluation of training of teachers in medical education in four medical schools of Nepal.尼泊尔四所医学院校医学教育教师培训情况评估。
Nepal Med Coll J. 2007 Sep;9(3):157-61.
6
Communities of teaching practice in the workplace: Evaluation of a faculty development programme.职场教学实践社区:一项教师发展计划的评估
Med Teach. 2016 Aug;38(8):808-14. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1112892. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
7
Effectiveness of teachers' training in assessment techniques: participants' perception.教师评估技术培训的有效性:参与者的看法。
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2011 Jul-Sep;9(35):189-92.
8
What do faculty feel about teaching in this school? assessment of medical education environment by teachers.教师对在这所学校教学有何看法?教师对医学教育环境的评估。
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2017 Jan-Apr;30(1):68-74. doi: 10.4103/1357-6283.210500.
9
[Pedagogical Professional Development of Medical Teachers: The Experience of NOVA Medical School / Universidade Nova de Lisboa].[医学教师的教学专业发展:新里斯本大学医学院的经验]
Acta Med Port. 2017 Mar 31;30(3):190-196. doi: 10.20344/amp.8446.
10
Does a faculty development programme improve teachers' perceived competence in different teacher roles?教师发展计划是否能提高教师对不同教师角色的感知能力?
Med Teach. 2009 Nov;31(11):1030-1. doi: 10.3109/01421590903183779.

引用本文的文献

1
The International Literature on Teaching Faculty Development in English-Language Journals: A Scoping Review and Recommendations for Core Topics.英文期刊中关于教师教学发展的国际文献:一项范围综述及核心主题建议
J Grad Med Educ. 2019 Aug;11(4 Suppl):47-63. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-19-00174.