Department of Psychology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Viale Ellittico, 31 81100, Caserta, Italy.
Department of Psychology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Viale Ellittico, 31 81100, Caserta, Italy.
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Sep;267:360-367. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.05.088. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
Chasing, or continuing to gamble in an attempt to recoup losses, is a salient feature of problematic gambling. This study, which controlled for gambling severity and alcohol consumption, investigated the association between chasing and maladaptive personality trait domains among habitual gamblers. Participants comprised 126 adult habitual gamblers (73% males) aged between 18 and 69 years. They were administered the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS), the Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Brief Form (PID-5-BF), the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), and a computerized task developed to assess chasing behavior. Participants were randomly assigned to two chasing conditions (Control and Loss). Data were submitted to correlational analysis, univariate and mixed-model ANOVAs, logistic and linear regression analyses. Results showed that the decision to chase was strongly associated with the PID-5-BF Disinhibition domain scores, whereas chasing proneness was related to the Disinhibition, Detachment and Psychoticism domains. Interestingly, chasers scored higher than nonchasers on maladaptive personality dimensions, even after controlling for gender, age, chasing condition, alcohol consumption, and gambling severity. Since these findings support the idea that chasers and nonchasers are different subtypes of gamblers, clinical interventions should take into account the additive role of chasing in gambling disorder.
追逐或继续赌博以试图挽回损失是问题赌博的一个显著特征。本研究在控制赌博严重程度和酒精消费的情况下,调查了习惯性赌徒中追逐行为与适应不良人格特质领域之间的关联。参与者包括 126 名年龄在 18 至 69 岁之间的成年习惯性赌徒(73%为男性)。他们接受了 South Oaks Gambling Screen(SOGS)、DSM-5-简明人格量表(PID-5-BF)、酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)和一项用于评估追逐行为的计算机任务的测试。参与者被随机分配到两个追逐条件(控制和损失)。数据进行了相关分析、单变量和混合模型方差分析、逻辑和线性回归分析。结果表明,追逐的决定与 PID-5-BF 去抑制领域的得分密切相关,而追逐倾向与去抑制、超脱和精神病态领域有关。有趣的是,追逐者在适应不良人格维度上的得分高于非追逐者,即使在控制了性别、年龄、追逐条件、酒精消费和赌博严重程度之后也是如此。由于这些发现支持了追逐者和非追逐者是不同类型的赌徒的观点,因此临床干预应该考虑到追逐在赌博障碍中的附加作用。