Suppr超能文献

使用消费技术协会标准评估步幅准确性。

Assessment of step accuracy using the Consumer Technology Association standard.

机构信息

a Department of Physical Therapy , Campbell University , Buies Creek , NC , USA.

b School of Health Sciences , Valdosta State University , Valdosta , GA , USA.

出版信息

J Sports Sci. 2019 Feb;37(3):244-248. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1491941. Epub 2018 Jun 29.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of commercially-available physical activity devices when walking and running at various treadmill speeds using CTA 2056: Physical Activity Monitoring for Fitness Wearables: Step Counting, standard by the Consumer Technology Association (CTA). Twenty participants (10 males and 10 females) completed self-paced walking and running protocols on the treadmill for five minutes each. Eight devices (Apple iWatch series 1, Fitbit Surge, Garmin 235, Moto 360, Polar A360, Suunto Spartan Sport, Suunto Spartan Trainer, and TomTom Spark 3) were tested two at a time, one per wrist. Manual step counts were obtained from video to serve as the benchmark. The mean absolute percent error (MAPE) was calculated during walking and running. During walking, three devices: Fitbit Surge (11.20%), Suunto Sport (22.93%), and TomTom (10.11%) and during running, one device, Polar (10.66%), exceeded the CTA suggestion of a MAPE < 10%. The Moto 360 had the lowest MAPE of all devices for both walking and running. The devices tested had higher step accuracy with running than walking, except for the Polar. Overall, the Apple iWatch series 1, Moto 360, Garmin, and Suunto Spartan Trainer met the CTA standard for both walking and running.

摘要

本研究旨在比较在不同跑步机速度下使用消费者技术协会(CTA)标准 CTA 2056:健身可穿戴设备的活动监测 - 计步器(Physical Activity Monitoring for Fitness Wearables: Step Counting)时,市售活动设备的准确性。20 名参与者(10 名男性和 10 名女性)分别以自我设定的速度在跑步机上完成了五分钟的步行和跑步。共测试了 8 种设备(Apple iWatch series 1、Fitbit Surge、Garmin 235、Moto 360、Polar A360、Suunto Spartan Sport、Suunto Spartan Trainer 和 TomTom Spark 3),每次测试两种设备,每种设备戴在一只手腕上。手动计步作为基准。在步行和跑步过程中计算平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)。在步行时,三款设备:Fitbit Surge(11.20%)、Suunto Sport(22.93%)和 TomTom(10.11%),以及在跑步时,一款设备 Polar(10.66%),超出了 CTA 建议的 MAPE<10%。在所有设备中,Moto 360 在步行和跑步时的 MAPE 最低。除了 Polar 之外,与步行相比,测试设备在跑步时的计步准确率更高。总体而言,Apple iWatch series 1、Moto 360、Garmin 和 Suunto Spartan Trainer 在步行和跑步时均符合 CTA 标准。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验