Willis Jeffrey R, Doan Quan V, Gleeson Michelle, Haskova Zdenka, Ramulu Pradeep, Morse Lawrence, Cantrell Ronald A
a Department of Clinical Science and Ophthalmology , Genentech, Inc ., South San Francisco , CA , USA.
b Department of Ophthalmology , UC Davis Eye Center , Sacramento , CA , USA.
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2018 Oct-Dec;25(5-6):365-372. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2018.1489970. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
To assess healthcare utilization patterns across diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity levels in the United States (US).
Cross-sectional study of 699 adults, participating in the 2005-2008 National Health and Nutritional Examination Surveys.
Diagnosis of DR was based on fundus photographs and categorized as: (1) no DR; (2) mild/moderate nonproliferative DR (NPDR); and (3) severe NPDR/proliferative DR (PDR). Healthcare utilization patterns were assessed during a household questionnaire where survey participants self-reported: (1) awareness that diabetes had affected their eyes; (2) pupil-dilation during the past year; and (3) visits to a diabetes education/nutrition specialist during the past year.
Among adults with self-reported diabetes, the proportion of those that were aware that diabetes had affected their eye was 15.3% [95% confidence interval (C.I.)] 10.9-19.6%), 21.7% (95% C.I. 14.6-28.7%), and 81.5% (95% C.I. 66.5-96.5%) across those with no retinopathy, mild/moderate NPDR, and severe NPDR/PDR, respectively (p < 0.01). The utilization of a diabetic education/nutrition specialist during the past year was 30.4% (95% C.I. 24.8-36.0%), 31.8% (95% C.I 23.4-40.2%), and 55.9% (95% C.I. 32.3-79.6%) across those with no retinopathy, mild/moderate NPDR, and severe NPDR/PDR, respectively (p = 0.13). Pupil dilation within the past year was 62.2% (95% C.I. 56.3-68.1%), 62.1% (95% C.I. 53.4-70.8%), and 93.8% (95% C.I. 87.3-100.0%) across those with no DR, mild/moderate NPDR, and severe NPDR/PDR, respectively (p = 0.01).
Adults with diabetes in the United States, even those with the most severe forms of DR, do not fully utilize healthcare services for diabetic eye disease. Future studies should aim to address barriers to appropriate diabetes care.
评估美国糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)不同严重程度水平下的医疗服务利用模式。
对参与2005 - 2008年国家健康与营养检查调查的699名成年人进行横断面研究。
DR的诊断基于眼底照片,并分类为:(1)无DR;(2)轻度/中度非增殖性DR(NPDR);(3)重度NPDR/增殖性DR(PDR)。在家庭问卷调查中评估医疗服务利用模式,调查参与者自我报告:(1)意识到糖尿病已影响其眼睛;(2)过去一年的散瞳情况;(3)过去一年就诊糖尿病教育/营养专家的情况。
在自我报告患有糖尿病的成年人中,无视网膜病变、轻度/中度NPDR、重度NPDR/PDR者中意识到糖尿病已影响其眼睛的比例分别为15.3% [95%置信区间(C.I.)10.9 - 19.6%]、21.7%(95% C.I. 14.6 - 28.7%)和81.5%(95% C.I. 66.5 - 96.5%)(p < 0.01)。过去一年中,无视网膜病变、轻度/中度NPDR、重度NPDR/PDR者就诊糖尿病教育/营养专家的比例分别为30.4%(95% C.I. 24.8 - 36.0%)、31.8%(95% C.I 23.4 - 40.2%)和55.9%(95% C.I. 32.3 - 79.6%)(p = 0.13)。过去一年中,无DR、轻度/中度NPDR、重度NPDR/PDR者的散瞳比例分别为62.2%(95% C.I. 56.3 - 68.1%)、62.1%(95% C.I. 53.4 - 70.8%)和93.8%(95% C.I. 87.3 - 100.0%)(p = 0.01)。
美国患有糖尿病成人,即使是患有最严重形式DR的患者,也未充分利用针对糖尿病眼病的医疗服务。未来研究应致力于解决适当糖尿病护理的障碍。