Suppr超能文献

老年髋部骨折团队康复治疗效果的 Meta 分析:随机对照试验研究

Effects of Geriatric Team Rehabilitation After Hip Fracture: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

机构信息

Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Geriatrics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Department of Clinical Sciences, Orthopedics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Oct;19(10):840-845. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.05.008. Epub 2018 Jun 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Systematic rehabilitation by geriatric interdisciplinary teams has been associated with favorable outcomes in frail older patients. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of interdisciplinary geriatric team rehabilitation in older patients with hip fracture.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized controlled trials involving participants sustaining hip fractures at the age of 65 years or older were included. Included trials evaluated effects of interdisciplinary geriatric team rehabilitation compared with usual postoperative care and reported on at least one of the following outcomes: activities of daily living (ADLs), physical function, mobility, depression, cognitive function, discharge to home, quality of life, influence on relatives, complications, and survival. Seven studies of at least moderate quality with a total of 1763 participants were included.

MEASURES

Data were combined using a random-effects model. The GRADE system (1-4, where 4 is highest level of evidence) was used to rate the quality of the estimates.

RESULTS

Outcomes were grouped into 4 categories, each of which was reported on in at least 4 studies: ADL/physical function, mobility, living in one's own home, and survival. Interdisciplinary geriatric team rehabilitation increased ADL/physical function (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-0.47) and mobility (SMD, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.12-0.52) compared with conventional care. In contrast, interdisciplinary geriatric team rehabilitation did not increase the chance of living in one's own home after discharge (risk ratio [RR], 1.07; 95% CI, 0.99-1.16) or survival (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.99-1.06) compared with conventional care. All results were rated as GRADE 3.

CONCLUSION

Systematic rehabilitation by geriatric interdisciplinary teams increases physical function and mobility significantly compared with conventional care in patients with hip fracture. In contrast, the chance of being discharged to one's own home and survival are not influenced.

摘要

目的

老年多学科团队的系统康复与虚弱老年患者的良好结局相关。本荟萃分析的目的是评估多学科老年团队康复对老年髋部骨折患者的影响。

设计、地点和参与者:纳入了年龄在 65 岁及以上因髋部骨折而住院的患者的随机对照试验。纳入的试验评估了多学科老年团队康复与常规术后护理的效果,并报告了以下至少一项结果:日常生活活动(ADL)、身体功能、活动能力、抑郁、认知功能、出院回家、生活质量、对亲属的影响、并发症和生存。共纳入 7 项至少为中等质量的研究,共 1763 名参与者。

措施

使用随机效应模型合并数据。使用 GRADE 系统(1-4,其中 4 为最高证据级别)对估计值的质量进行评分。

结果

结果分为 4 类,每类至少有 4 项研究报告:ADL/身体功能、活动能力、居住在自己家中和生存。与常规护理相比,多学科老年团队康复可改善 ADL/身体功能(标准化均数差 [SMD],0.32;95%置信区间 [CI],0.17-0.47)和活动能力(SMD,0.32;95% CI,0.12-0.52)。相反,与常规护理相比,多学科老年团队康复并没有增加出院后居住在自己家中的机会(风险比 [RR],1.07;95% CI,0.99-1.16)或生存(RR,1.02;95% CI,0.99-1.06)。所有结果均被评为 GRADE 3 级。

结论

与常规护理相比,老年多学科团队的系统康复可显著提高髋部骨折患者的身体功能和活动能力。相比之下,出院回家和生存的机会没有受到影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验