Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Geriatric Medicine and Physiotherapy, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Geriatric Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Clin Interv Aging. 2020 Sep 4;15:1575-1586. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S250809. eCollection 2020.
To investigate if the effects of geriatric interdisciplinary home rehabilitation after hip fracture were different among people with dementia compared to those without dementia and to describe the overall outcome after hip fracture in people with dementia.
A post hoc subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial was conducted including 205 people with hip fracture, aged ≥70, living in ordinary housing or residential care facilities. Early discharge followed by individually designed interdisciplinary home rehabilitation for a maximum of 10 weeks was compared to in-hospital geriatric care according to a multifactorial rehabilitation program. Outcomes were hospital length of stay (LOS), readmissions, falls, mortality, performance in activities of daily living (ADL), and walking ability.
Interdisciplinary home rehabilitation vs in-hospital care had comparable effects on falls and mortality between discharge and 12 months and on ADL and walking ability at 3 and 12 months regardless of whether the participants had dementia or not (≥0.05 for all). Among participants with dementia, postoperative LOS was a median of 18 days (interquartile range [IQR] 14-30) in the home rehabilitation group vs 23 days (IQR 15-30) in the control group (=0.254) with comparable numbers of readmissions after discharge. Dementia was associated with increased risk of falling (odds ratio [OR] 3.86; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.05-7.27; <0.001) and increased mortality (OR 4.20; 95% CI 1.79-9.92, =0.001) between discharge and 12 months and with greater dependence in ADL and walking at 3 and 12 months compared to participants without dementia (<0.001 for all).
The effects of geriatric interdisciplinary home rehabilitation vs in-hospital geriatric care did not differ in participants with and without dementia. However, the statistical power of this subgroup analysis was likely insufficient to detect differences between the groups. Dementia was associated with a substantial negative impact on the outcomes following the hip fracture. Our findings support offering interdisciplinary home rehabilitation after hip fracture to people with dementia.
研究老年髋部骨折患者接受跨学科家庭康复治疗的效果是否因痴呆而不同,并描述髋部骨折合并痴呆患者的总体康复效果。
这是一项随机对照试验的事后亚组分析,纳入了 205 名年龄≥70 岁、居住在普通住房或养老院的髋部骨折患者。早期出院后,根据多因素康复计划,接受个体化设计的跨学科家庭康复治疗,最长 10 周,与住院期间的老年综合康复治疗进行比较。结局指标包括住院时间(LOS)、再入院、跌倒、死亡率、日常生活活动(ADL)能力和行走能力。
无论患者是否患有痴呆,跨学科家庭康复治疗与住院治疗在出院后 12 个月内的跌倒和死亡率以及 3 个月和 12 个月的 ADL 和行走能力方面的效果相当(所有结局指标 P≥0.05)。在患有痴呆的患者中,家庭康复组的术后 LOS 中位数为 18 天(四分位间距 [IQR] 14-30),对照组为 23 天(IQR 15-30)( P=0.254),出院后再入院的人数相当。痴呆与跌倒风险增加相关(优势比 [OR] 3.86;95%置信区间 [CI] 2.05-7.27; P<0.001),且与出院后 12 个月内死亡率增加相关(OR 4.20;95% CI 1.79-9.92; P=0.001),与无痴呆患者相比,ADL 和行走能力的依赖性更高(所有结局 P<0.001)。
老年髋部骨折患者接受跨学科家庭康复治疗与住院老年综合康复治疗的效果在痴呆患者和非痴呆患者中没有差异。然而,本亚组分析的统计效能可能不足以检测到两组之间的差异。痴呆与髋部骨折后结局的显著负面影响相关。我们的研究结果支持为髋部骨折后痴呆患者提供跨学科家庭康复治疗。