Recovery Research Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 151 Merrimac Street, Boston, MA 02114, United States..
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 North Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.
Addict Behav. 2018 Dec;87:74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.06.018. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
Online technologies are well integrated into the day-to-day lives of individuals with alcohol and other drug (i.e., substance use) problems. Interventions that leverage online technologies have been shown to enhance outcomes for these individuals. To date, however, little is known about how those with substance use problems naturally engage with such platforms. In addition, the scientific literatures on health behavior change facilitated by technology and harms driven by technology engagement have developed largely independent of one another. In this secondary analysis of the National Recovery Study (NRS), which provides a geo-demographically representative sample of US adults who resolved a substance use problem, we examined a) the weighted prevalence estimate of individuals who engaged with online technologies to "cut down on substance use, abstain from substances, or strengthen one's recovery" (i.e., recovery-related use of online technology, or ROOT), b) clinical/recovery correlates of ROOT, controlling for demographic covariates, and c) the unique association between ROOT and self-reported history of internet addiction. Results showed one in ten (11%) NRS participants reported ROOT. Significant correlates included greater current psychological distress, younger age of first substance use, as well as history of anti-craving/anti-relapse medication, recovery support services, and drug court participation. Odds of lifetime internet addiction were 4 times greater for those with ROOT (vs. no ROOT). These data build on studies of technology-based interventions, highlighting the reach of ROOT, and therefore, the potential for a large, positive impact on substance-related harms in the US.
在线技术已经很好地融入了有酒精和其他药物(即物质使用)问题的个人的日常生活中。利用在线技术的干预措施已被证明可以改善这些人的结果。然而,到目前为止,人们对有物质使用问题的人如何自然地使用这些平台知之甚少。此外,由技术促进的健康行为改变和由技术参与带来的危害的科学文献在很大程度上彼此独立发展。在这项对国家康复研究(NRS)的二次分析中,NRS 为解决物质使用问题的美国成年人提供了具有地理人口代表性的样本,我们研究了:a)使用在线技术“减少物质使用、戒除物质或加强康复”的个人的加权流行率估计(即与康复相关的在线技术使用,或 ROOT),b)ROOT 的临床/康复相关性,控制人口统计学协变量,c)ROOT 与自我报告的互联网成瘾史之间的独特关联。结果显示,十分之一的 NRS 参与者(11%)报告了 ROOT。显著相关因素包括当前心理困扰更大、首次使用物质的年龄更小、抗渴求/抗复发药物、康复支持服务和毒品法庭参与史。有 ROOT 的人终生互联网成瘾的几率是没有 ROOT 的人的 4 倍。这些数据建立在基于技术的干预措施研究的基础上,突出了 ROOT 的覆盖面,因此,有可能对美国与物质相关的危害产生重大积极影响。