Krista Wolcott Altaker is an assistant professor of nursing at Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, California. Jill Howie-Esquivel is an associate professor of nursing at the University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia. Janine K. Cataldo is a professor and chair of the Department of Physiological Nursing at the University of California, San Francisco.
Am J Crit Care. 2018 Jul;27(4):295-302. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2018252.
Intensive care unit nurses experience moral distress when they feel unable to deliver ethically appropriate care to patients. Moral distress is associated with nurse burnout and patient care avoidance.
To evaluate relationships among moral distress, empowerment, ethical climate, and access to palliative care in the intensive care unit.
Intensive care unit nurses in a national database were recruited to complete an online survey based on the Moral Distress Scale-Revised, Psychological Empowerment Index, Hospital Ethical Climate Survey, and a palliative care delivery questionnaire. Descriptive, correlational, and regression analyses were performed.
Of 288 initiated surveys, 238 were completed. Participants were nationally representative of nurses by age, years of experience, and geographical region. Most were white and female and had a bachelor's degree. The mean moral distress score was moderately high, and correlations were found with empowerment ( = -0.145; = .02) and ethical climate scores ( = -0.354; < .001). Relationships between moral distress and empowerment scores and between moral distress and ethical climate scores were not affected by access to palliative care. Nurses reporting palliative care access had higher moral distress scores than those without such access. Education, ethnicity, unit size, access to full palliative care team, and ethical climate explained variance in moral distress scores.
Poor ethical climate, unintegrated palliative care teams, and nurse empowerment are associated with increased moral distress. The findings highlight the need to promote palliative care education and palliative care teams that are well integrated into intensive care units.
当重症监护病房的护士感到无法为患者提供符合伦理的护理时,他们会经历道德困境。道德困境与护士倦怠和回避患者护理有关。
评估重症监护病房中的道德困境、赋权、伦理氛围和获得姑息治疗之间的关系。
从全国性数据库中招募重症监护病房的护士,让他们填写基于道德困境量表修订版、心理赋权指数、医院伦理氛围调查和姑息治疗提供问卷的在线调查。进行描述性、相关性和回归分析。
在 288 份启动的调查中,有 238 份完成。参与者在年龄、工作年限和地理位置方面代表了全国护士的情况。大多数是白人,女性,拥有学士学位。平均道德困境得分较高,与赋权( = -0.145; =.02)和伦理氛围得分( = -0.354; <.001)相关。道德困境与赋权得分之间以及道德困境与伦理氛围得分之间的关系不受姑息治疗机会的影响。报告有姑息治疗机会的护士的道德困境得分高于没有这种机会的护士。教育程度、种族、单位规模、获得完整姑息治疗团队以及伦理氛围解释了道德困境得分的差异。
不良的伦理氛围、姑息治疗团队整合不足和护士赋权与道德困境增加有关。研究结果强调需要促进姑息治疗教育和整合良好的姑息治疗团队到重症监护病房中。