• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Predicting Barriers to Treatment for Depression in a U.S. National Sample: A Cross-Sectional, Proof-of-Concept Study.预测美国全国样本中抑郁治疗障碍:一项横断面、概念验证研究。
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Aug 1;69(8):927-934. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800094. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
2
Perceived barriers to psychological treatments and their relationship to depression.感知到的心理治疗障碍及其与抑郁的关系。
J Clin Psychol. 2010 Apr;66(4):394-409. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20659.
3
The prevalence and correlates of untreated serious mental illness.未经治疗的严重精神疾病的患病率及其相关因素。
Health Serv Res. 2001 Dec;36(6 Pt 1):987-1007.
4
Help-seeking behaviours, barriers to care and self-efficacy for seeking mental health care: a population-based study in Rwanda.寻求心理健康护理的求助行为、护理障碍和自我效能:卢旺达一项基于人群的研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016 Jan;51(1):81-92. doi: 10.1007/s00127-015-1130-2. Epub 2015 Oct 3.
5
Treatment-seeking behaviors and attitudes survey among women at risk for perinatal depression or anxiety.对有围产期抑郁或焦虑风险的女性的就医行为及态度调查。
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2013 Mar-Apr;42(2):168-77. doi: 10.1111/1552-6909.12014. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
6
Are perceived barriers to accessing mental healthcare associated with socioeconomic position among individuals with symptoms of depression? Questionnaire-results from the Lolland-Falster Health Study, a rural Danish population study.在有抑郁症状的个体中,获得精神保健服务的感知障碍是否与社会经济地位有关?来自洛兰-法尔斯特健康研究的问卷调查结果,这是一项丹麦农村人群研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 15;9(3):e023844. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023844.
7
The effect of VISHRAM, a grass-roots community-based mental health programme, on the treatment gap for depression in rural communities in India: a population-based study.一项基于人群的研究:印度农村社区基层心理健康项目“VISHRAM”对抑郁症治疗缺口的影响
Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;4(2):128-135. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30424-2. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
8
Barriers to psychotherapy among depressed and nondepressed primary care patients.抑郁和非抑郁初级保健患者接受心理治疗的障碍。
Ann Behav Med. 2006 Dec;32(3):254-8. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm3203_12.
9
Why underserved patients do not consult their general practitioner for depression: results of a qualitative and a quantitative survey at a free outpatient clinic in Paris, France.为何医疗服务不足的患者不就抑郁症问题咨询其全科医生:法国巴黎一家免费门诊的定性与定量调查结果
BMC Fam Pract. 2015 May 8;16:57. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0273-2.
10
Psychotherapeutic interventions for depressed, low-income women: a review of the literature.心理治疗干预对抑郁、低收入女性的影响:文献综述。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Dec;30(8):934-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.06.006. Epub 2010 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Rewriting the Script: The Need for Effective Education to Address Racial Disparities in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Uptake in BIPOC Communities.改写剧本:在黑人和有色人种社区中,为解决经颅磁刺激治疗获取方面的种族差异而进行有效教育的必要性。
Neuroethics. 2024 Apr;17(1). doi: 10.1007/s12152-024-09542-9. Epub 2024 Jan 27.
2
Patient and provider factors associated with follow-up for positive depression screens in adults: a retrospective review of University of Utah primary and specialty care clinics.与成人抑郁症筛查呈阳性后的随访相关的患者和提供者因素:犹他大学初级和专科护理诊所的回顾性研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 11;15(1):e088973. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088973.
3
Energetic activity for depression in young people aged 13-17 years: the READY feasibility RCT.针对13至17岁青少年抑郁症的精力充沛活动:READY可行性随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Dec 18:1-26. doi: 10.3310/KWNH4507.
4
Provider and patient barriers and facilitators to integration of digital mental health applications in routine clinical care.数字心理健康应用程序融入常规临床护理过程中提供者和患者面临的障碍及促进因素。
J Affect Disord. 2024 Oct 15;363:55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.07.089. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
5
Framing Effects of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Depression on Perceptions of Believability, Acceptability, and Credibility.认知行为疗法治疗抑郁症对可信度、可接受性和可信性感知的框架效应。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jul 9;20(14):6330. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20146330.
6
Efficacy of stand-alone digital mental health applications for anxiety and depression: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.单独使用的数字心理健康应用程序治疗焦虑和抑郁的疗效:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Psychiatr Res. 2023 Aug;164:171-183. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.06.019. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
7
Comparative Efficacy of Exercise Training and Conventional Psychotherapies for Adult Depression: A Network Meta-Analysis.运动训练与传统心理疗法对成人抑郁症的疗效比较:一项网状Meta分析。
Commonhealth (Phila). 2022 Jun;3(2):47-64. Epub 2022 Apr 15.
8
Public mental health during and after the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: Opportunities for intervention emotional self-efficacy and resilience.新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间及之后的公众心理健康:干预机会、情绪自我效能感和心理韧性。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 23;14:1016337. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1016337. eCollection 2023.
9
Depression, anxiety, and stress among university students in Selangor, Malaysia during COVID-19 pandemics and their associated factors.马来西亚雪兰莪州大学生在 COVID-19 大流行期间的抑郁、焦虑和压力及其相关因素。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 25;18(1):e0280680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280680. eCollection 2023.
10
The Seeking Mental Health Care model: prediction of help-seeking for depressive symptoms by stigma and mental illness representations.寻求心理健康服务模型:通过污名和精神疾病观念预测抑郁症状的求助倾向。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jan 10;23(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14937-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Multivariate Pattern Analysis of Genotype-Phenotype Relationships in Schizophrenia.多变量模式分析精神分裂症的基因型-表型关系。
Schizophr Bull. 2018 Aug 20;44(5):1045-1052. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sby005.
2
Bigger Data, Harder Questions-Opportunities Throughout Mental Health Care.更大的数据,更难的问题——心理健康护理中的机遇
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Dec 1;74(12):1183-1184. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.3333.
3
Factors associated with help-seeking behaviour among individuals with major depression: A systematic review.重度抑郁症患者寻求帮助行为的相关因素:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2017 May 11;12(5):e0176730. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176730. eCollection 2017.
4
Reevaluating the Efficacy and Predictability of Antidepressant Treatments: A Symptom Clustering Approach.重新评估抗抑郁治疗的疗效和可预测性:一种症状聚类方法。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 1;74(4):370-378. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0025.
5
Addressing the treatment gap: A key challenge for extending evidence-based psychosocial interventions.解决治疗差距:推广基于证据的心理社会干预的关键挑战。
Behav Res Ther. 2017 Jan;88:7-18. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.06.004.
6
Undertreatment of people with major depressive disorder in 21 countries.21个国家中重度抑郁症患者的治疗不足。
Br J Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;210(2):119-124. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.188078. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
7
Community mental health care worldwide: current status and further developments.全球社区精神卫生保健:现状与未来发展
World Psychiatry. 2016 Oct;15(3):276-286. doi: 10.1002/wps.20349.
8
Predicting Suicidal Behavior From Longitudinal Electronic Health Records.从纵向电子健康记录预测自杀行为。
Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Feb 1;174(2):154-162. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16010077. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
9
Treatment of Adult Depression in the United States.成人抑郁症的美国治疗。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Oct 1;176(10):1482-1491. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5057.
10
Multisite prediction of 4-week and 52-week treatment outcomes in patients with first-episode psychosis: a machine learning approach.首发精神病患者4周和52周治疗结局的多中心预测:一种机器学习方法。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Oct;3(10):935-946. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30171-7. Epub 2016 Aug 25.

预测美国全国样本中抑郁治疗障碍:一项横断面、概念验证研究。

Predicting Barriers to Treatment for Depression in a U.S. National Sample: A Cross-Sectional, Proof-of-Concept Study.

机构信息

Dr. Chekroud, Dr. Gerhard, Dr. Gueorguieva, and Dr. Krystal are with the Department of Psychiatry and Dr. Roy is with the Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. Dr. Chekroud is also with Spring Health, New York, where Mr. Chandra and Dr. Subramanyan are affiliated. Dr. Gueorguieva is also with the Department of Biostatistics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. Mr. Foster is with Applied Data Science Partners, London. Dr. Zheutlin is with the Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston. Dr. Koutsouleris is with the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich. Ms. Degli Esposti is with the Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. Dr. Paulus is with the Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Oklahoma.

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Aug 1;69(8):927-934. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800094. Epub 2018 Jul 2.

DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.201800094
PMID:29962307
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7232987/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Even though safe and effective treatments for depression are available, many individuals with a diagnosis of depression do not obtain treatment. This study aimed to develop a tool to identify persons who might not initiate treatment among those who acknowledge a need.

METHODS

Data were aggregated from the 2008-2014 U.S. National Survey on Drug Use and Health (N=391,753), including 20,785 adults given a diagnosis of depression by a health care provider in the 12 months before the survey. Machine learning was applied to self-report survey items to develop strategies for identifying individuals who might not get needed treatment.

RESULTS

A derivation cohort aggregated between 2008 and 2013 was used to develop a model that identified the 30.6% of individuals with depression who reported needing but not getting treatment. When applied to independent responses from the 2014 cohort, the model identified 72% of those who did not initiate treatment (p<.01), with a balanced accuracy that was also significantly above chance (71%, p<.01). For individuals who did not get treatment, the model predicted 10 (out of 15) reasons that they endorsed as barriers to treatment, with balanced accuracies between 53% and 65% (p<.05 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

Considerable work is needed to improve follow-up and retention rates after the critical initial meeting in which a patient is given a diagnosis of depression. Routinely collected information about patients with depression could identify those at risk of not obtaining needed treatment, which may inform the development and implementation of interventions to reduce the prevalence of untreated depression.

摘要

目的

尽管有安全有效的抑郁症治疗方法,但许多被诊断为抑郁症的患者并未接受治疗。本研究旨在开发一种工具,以识别那些承认有治疗需求但可能不会开始治疗的患者。

方法

数据来自 2008-2014 年美国全国药物使用与健康调查(N=391753),包括在调查前 12 个月内被医疗保健提供者诊断为抑郁症的 20785 名成年人。应用机器学习对自我报告的调查项目进行分析,以制定识别可能无法获得所需治疗的个体的策略。

结果

使用 2008 年至 2013 年聚合的推导队列来开发一种模型,该模型确定了 30.6%报告需要但未获得治疗的抑郁症患者。当应用于 2014 年队列的独立回复时,该模型识别出 72%未开始治疗的患者(p<.01),其均衡准确性也明显高于机会水平(71%,p<.01)。对于未接受治疗的个体,该模型预测了他们认可的 10 个(共 15 个)治疗障碍原因,其均衡准确性在 53%至 65%之间(所有原因均为 p<.05)。

结论

在患者被诊断为抑郁症的关键初始会议之后,需要做大量工作来提高随访和保留率。常规收集有关抑郁症患者的信息可以识别出那些可能无法获得所需治疗的患者,这可能有助于制定和实施干预措施,以降低未治疗抑郁症的患病率。