Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam 13620, Korea.
Department of Pathology and Translational Genomics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea.
Korean J Radiol. 2018 Jul-Aug;19(4):656-664. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.19.4.656. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
Core needle biopsy (CNB) of the thyroid is an additional diagnostic method for non-diagnostic or indeterminate cytology samples. We sought to evaluate a new modified core biopsy technique and compare the concordance of its diagnosis with the final diagnosis of the surgically resected specimen.
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 842 patients who had a thyroid CNB with or without a previous fine-needle aspiration from August 2002 to March 2015; 38% of patients ultimately underwent thyroidectomy. We divided the patients into two groups for comparison: conventional group (n = 329) and new modified technique group (n = 513) that enabled sampling of not only the lesion but also the margin and surrounding parenchyma. The diagnostic conclusiveness of CNB and concordant rate with thyroidectomy was compared between the two groups.
The overall diagnostic conclusiveness did not exhibit a significant increase (77% in the conventional technique group and 75% in the modified technique group, = 0.408). In terms of the diagnostic concordance rate between CNB and thyroidectomy, no overall significant increase was observed (83% in the conventional technique group and 88% in the modified technique group, = 0.194). However, only in follicular-patterned lesions (nodular hyperplasia, follicular neoplasm, and follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma), a significant increase in the diagnostic concordance rate was observed (83% in the conventional group and 94% in the modified technique group, = 0.033).
Modified CNB technique can be beneficial for the accurate diagnosis of follicular-patterned thyroid lesions.
甲状腺核心针活检(CNB)是对非诊断性或不确定细胞学样本的一种额外诊断方法。我们旨在评估一种新的改良核心活检技术,并比较其诊断与手术切除标本最终诊断的一致性。
对 2002 年 8 月至 2015 年 3 月间接受甲状腺 CNB 检查的 842 例患者进行回顾性分析,其中 38%的患者最终接受了甲状腺切除术。我们将患者分为两组进行比较:常规组(n=329)和新改良技术组(n=513),后者不仅可以对病变部位进行取样,还可以对边缘和周围实质进行取样。比较两组间 CNB 的诊断准确性和与甲状腺切除术的一致性。
总体诊断准确性没有显著增加(常规组为 77%,改良组为 75%, = 0.408)。在 CNB 与甲状腺切除术的诊断一致性方面,没有观察到总体显著增加(常规组为 83%,改良组为 88%, = 0.194)。然而,仅在滤泡模式病变(结节性增生、滤泡性肿瘤和滤泡型甲状腺癌的变体)中,观察到诊断一致性的显著增加(常规组为 83%,改良组为 94%, = 0.033)。
改良 CNB 技术有助于准确诊断滤泡模式的甲状腺病变。