Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Anatomic Pathology, Department of Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna School of Medicine, Bologna, Italy.
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Aug 1;2(8):1023-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0386.
Although growing evidence points to highly indolent behavior of encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (EFVPTC), most patients with EFVPTC are treated as having conventional thyroid cancer.
To evaluate clinical outcomes, refine diagnostic criteria, and develop a nomenclature that appropriately reflects the biological and clinical characteristics of EFVPTC.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: International, multidisciplinary, retrospective study of patients with thyroid nodules diagnosed as EFVPTC, including 109 patients with noninvasive EFVPTC observed for 10 to 26 years and 101 patients with invasive EFVPTC observed for 1 to 18 years. Review of digitized histologic slides collected at 13 sites in 5 countries by 24 thyroid pathologists from 7 countries. A series of teleconferences and a face-to-face conference were used to establish consensus diagnostic criteria and develop new nomenclature.
Frequency of adverse outcomes, including death from disease, distant or locoregional metastases, and structural or biochemical recurrence, in patients with noninvasive and invasive EFVPTC diagnosed on the basis of a set of reproducible histopathologic criteria.
Consensus diagnostic criteria for EFVPTC were developed by 24 thyroid pathologists. All of the 109 patients with noninvasive EFVPTC (67 treated with only lobectomy, none received radioactive iodine ablation) were alive with no evidence of disease at final follow-up (median [range], 13 [10-26] years). An adverse event was seen in 12 of 101 (12%) of the cases of invasive EFVPTC, including 5 patients developing distant metastases, 2 of whom died of disease. Based on the outcome information for noninvasive EFVPTC, the name "noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features" (NIFTP) was adopted. A simplified diagnostic nuclear scoring scheme was developed and validated, yielding a sensitivity of 98.6% (95% CI, 96.3%-99.4%), specificity of 90.1% (95% CI, 86.0%-93.1%), and overall classification accuracy of 94.3% (95% CI, 92.1%-96.0%) for NIFTP.
Thyroid tumors currently diagnosed as noninvasive EFVPTC have a very low risk of adverse outcome and should be termed NIFTP. This reclassification will affect a large population of patients worldwide and result in a significant reduction in psychological and clinical consequences associated with the diagnosis of cancer.
尽管越来越多的证据表明包膜滤泡状变异型甲状腺乳头状癌(EFVPTC)的行为具有高度惰性,但大多数 EFVPTC 患者仍被视为患有常规甲状腺癌。
评估临床结果,完善诊断标准,并制定一个恰当地反映 EFVPTC 生物学和临床特征的命名。
设计、地点和参与者:对 109 例经非侵袭性 EFVPTC 诊断并观察 10 至 26 年的患者和 101 例经侵袭性 EFVPTC 诊断并观察 1 至 18 年的患者进行国际、多学科、回顾性研究。由来自 7 个国家的 24 位甲状腺病理学家对在 5 个国家的 13 个地点收集的数字化组织学切片进行回顾。使用一系列电话会议和面对面会议,达成了诊断标准的共识并制定了新的命名。
依据一组可重复的组织病理学标准诊断为非侵袭性和侵袭性 EFVPTC 的患者的不良结局(包括死于疾病、远处或局部转移以及结构或生化复发)的频率。
24 位甲状腺病理学家制定了 EFVPTC 的共识诊断标准。109 例非侵袭性 EFVPTC 患者(67 例仅接受了 lobectomy,无放射性碘消融治疗)全部存活,无疾病证据(中位随访时间[范围]:13 [10-26]年)。侵袭性 EFVPTC 患者中有 12 例(12%)发生了不良事件,包括 5 例远处转移,其中 2 例死于疾病。根据非侵袭性 EFVPTC 的结果信息,采用了“非侵袭性滤泡性甲状腺肿瘤伴乳头状核特征”(NIFTP)的名称。制定并验证了简化的核评分方案,NIFTP 的敏感性为 98.6%(95%CI,96.3%-99.4%),特异性为 90.1%(95%CI,86.0%-93.1%),总体分类准确率为 94.3%(95%CI,92.1%-96.0%)。
目前诊断为非侵袭性 EFVPTC 的甲状腺肿瘤发生不良结局的风险极低,应称为 NIFTP。这种重新分类将影响全球大量患者,并显著降低与癌症诊断相关的心理和临床后果。