Hamilton Jesse I, Jiang Yun, Ma Dan, Lo Wei-Ching, Gulani Vikas, Griswold Mark, Seiberlich Nicole
Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Dept. of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Nov;53:40-51. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2018.06.018. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
This study aims to improve the accuracy and consistency of T and T measurements using cardiac MR Fingerprinting (cMRF) by investigating and accounting for the effects of confounding factors including slice profile, inversion and T preparation pulse efficiency, and B. The goal is to understand how measurements with different pulse sequences are affected by these factors. This can be used to determine which factors must be taken into account for accurate measurements, and which may be mitigated by the selection of an appropriate pulse sequence. Simulations were performed using a numerical cardiac phantom to assess the accuracy of over 600 cMRF sequences with different flip angles, TRs, and preparation pulses. A subset of sequences, including one with the lowest errors in T and T maps, was used in subsequent analyses. Errors due to non-ideal slice profile, preparation pulse efficiency, and B were quantified in Bloch simulations. Corrections for these effects were included in the dictionary generation and demonstrated in phantom and in vivo cardiac imaging at 3 T. Neglecting to model slice profile and preparation pulse efficiency led to underestimated T and overestimated T for most cMRF sequences. Sequences with smaller maximum flip angles were less affected by slice profile and B. Simulating all corrections in the dictionary improved the accuracy of T and T phantom measurements, regardless of acquisition pattern. More consistent myocardial T and T values were measured using different sequences after corrections. Based on these results, a pulse sequence which is minimally affected by confounding factors can be selected, and the appropriate residual corrections included for robust T and T mapping.
本研究旨在通过研究和考虑包括层面轮廓、反转和T1准备脉冲效率以及B值等混杂因素的影响,提高使用心脏磁共振指纹成像(cMRF)进行T1和T2测量的准确性和一致性。目标是了解不同脉冲序列的测量如何受到这些因素的影响。这可用于确定进行准确测量时必须考虑哪些因素,以及哪些因素可通过选择合适的脉冲序列来减轻影响。使用数值心脏模型进行模拟,以评估600多种具有不同翻转角、重复时间(TR)和准备脉冲的cMRF序列的准确性。在后续分析中使用了一部分序列,包括在T1和T2图中误差最低的一个序列。在布洛赫模拟中对由于非理想层面轮廓、准备脉冲效率和B值导致的误差进行了量化。在字典生成中纳入了对这些影响的校正,并在3T的模型和活体心脏成像中得到了验证。对于大多数cMRF序列,忽略对层面轮廓和准备脉冲效率进行建模会导致T1低估和T2高估。最大翻转角较小的序列受层面轮廓和B值的影响较小。在字典中模拟所有校正可提高T1和T2模型测量的准确性,而与采集模式无关。校正后,使用不同序列测量的心肌T1和T2值更加一致。基于这些结果,可以选择一个受混杂因素影响最小的脉冲序列,并纳入适当的残余校正以进行稳健的T1和T2映射。