Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Michigan Institute for Imaging Technology and Translation, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2024 Summer;26(1):100997. doi: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.100997. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocols can be lengthy and complex, which has driven the research community to develop new technologies to make these protocols more efficient and patient-friendly. Two different approaches to improving CMR have been proposed, specifically "all-in-one" CMR, where several contrasts and/or motion states are acquired simultaneously, and "real-time" CMR, in which the examination is accelerated to avoid the need for breathholding and/or cardiac gating. The goal of this two-part manuscript is to describe these two different types of emerging rapid CMR. To this end, the vision of each is described, along with techniques which have been devised and tested along the pathway of clinical implementation. The pros and cons of the different methods are presented, and the remaining open needs of each are detailed. Part 1 will tackle the "all-in-one" approaches, and Part 2 the "real-time" approaches along with an overall summary of these emerging methods.
心血管磁共振(CMR)方案可能冗长且复杂,这促使研究人员开发新技术,使这些方案更高效、更适合患者。已经提出了两种改进 CMR 的不同方法,特别是“一站式”CMR,其中同时采集几种对比和/或运动状态,以及“实时”CMR,其中检查被加速以避免需要屏气和/或心脏门控。本两部分手稿的目的是描述这两种不同类型的新兴快速 CMR。为此,描述了每种方法的愿景,以及在临床实施过程中设计和测试的技术。介绍了不同方法的优缺点,并详细说明了每种方法的剩余开放需求。第 1 部分将讨论“一站式”方法,第 2 部分将讨论“实时”方法以及对这些新兴方法的总体总结。