Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, P.O. BOX 12200, 00076 AALTO, Espoo, Finland.
Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, P.O. BOX 12200, 00076 AALTO, Espoo, Finland; Aalto NeuroImaging, Aalto University School of Science, P.O. BOX 12200, 00076 AALTO, Espoo, Finland.
Neuroimage. 2018 Oct 1;179:596-603. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.06.078. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
Corticokinematic coherence (CKC) between limb kinematics and magnetoencephalographic (MEG) signals reflects cortical processing of proprioceptive afference. However, it is unclear whether strength of CKC is reproducible across measurement sessions. We thus examined reproducibility of CKC in a follow-up study. Thirteen healthy right-handed volunteers (7 females, 21.7 ± 4.3 yrs) were measured using MEG in two separate sessions 12.6 ± 1.3 months apart. The participant was seated and relaxed while his/her dominant or non-dominant index finger was continuously moved at 3 Hz (4 min for each hand) using a pneumatic movement actuator. Finger kinematics were recorded with a 3-axis accelerometer. Coherence was computed between finger acceleration and MEG signals. CKC strength was defined as the peak coherence value at 3 Hz form a single sensor among 40 pre-selected Rolandic gradiometers contralateral to the movement. Pneumatic movement actuator provided stable proprioceptive stimuli and significant CKC responses peaking at the contralateral Rolandic sensors. In the group level, CKC strength did not differ between the sessions in dominant (Day-1 0.40 ± 0.19 vs. Day-2 0.41 ± 0.17) or non-dominant (0.35 ± 0.16 vs. 0.36 ± 0.17) hand, nor between the hands. Intraclass-correlation coefficient (ICC) values indicated excellent inter-session reproducibility for CKC strength for both dominant (0.86) and non-dominant (0.97) hand. However, some participants showed pronounced inter-session variability in CKC strength, but only for the dominant hand. CKC is a promising tool to study proprioception in long-term longitudinal studies in the group level to follow, e.g., integrity of cortical proprioceptive processing with motor functions after stroke.
皮质运动相干性(CKC)反映了肢体运动学和脑磁图(MEG)信号之间皮质对本体感觉传入的处理。然而,目前尚不清楚 CKC 的强度在测量过程中是否具有可重复性。因此,我们在一项后续研究中检查了 CKC 的可重复性。13 名健康的右利手志愿者(7 名女性,21.7±4.3 岁)在两次独立的测量中接受了 MEG 测量,两次测量间隔 12.6±1.3 个月。参与者坐在座位上放松,同时使用气动运动执行器连续以 3Hz 的速度移动其优势或非优势食指(每只手 4 分钟)。手指运动学通过 3 轴加速度计记录。在手指加速度和 MEG 信号之间计算相干性。CKC 强度定义为在与运动相反的 40 个预选 Rolandic 梯度计中单个传感器上 3Hz 时的峰值相干值。气动运动执行器提供了稳定的本体感觉刺激和在对侧 Rolandic 传感器处达到峰值的显著 CKC 反应。在组水平上,主导手(第 1 天 0.40±0.19 与第 2 天 0.41±0.17)或非主导手(0.35±0.16 与 0.36±0.17)以及两只手之间的 CKC 强度在两次测量中没有差异。组内相关系数(ICC)值表明主导手(0.86)和非主导手(0.97)的 CKC 强度的两次测量之间具有极好的可重复性。然而,一些参与者在 CKC 强度方面表现出明显的两次测量之间的可变性,但仅针对主导手。CKC 是一种很有前途的工具,可用于在组水平上进行长期纵向研究,以跟踪例如皮质本体感觉处理与中风后运动功能的完整性。