• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[缓释肥料侧深施肥对稻田氨挥发的控制效应]

[Control Effect of Side Deep Fertilization with Slow-release Fertilizer on Ammonia Volatilization from Paddy Fields].

作者信息

Hou Peng-Fu, Xue Li-Xiang, Yu Ying-Liang, Xue Li-Hong, Fan Li-Hui, Yang Lin-Zhang

机构信息

Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China.

College of Agronomy, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.

出版信息

Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2017 Dec 8;38(12):5326-5332. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201705030.

DOI:10.13227/j.hjkx.201705030
PMID:29964597
Abstract

In order to reduce the ammonia volatilization in paddy fields, seven treatments were evaluated. These included three slow-release nitrogen fertilizers[sulfur-coated urea (SCU); resin-coated urea (RCU); release bulk blending fertilizer (RBB)], two fertilization modes[single base fertilization (B) and combined with panicle fertilizer (BF)], and conventional split fertilization (CN). The effects of side deep fertilization for slow-release nitrogen fertilizers on ammonia volatilization and surface water nitrogen dynamics were examined using a rice transplanter with a fertilizer sowing mechanism in the Taihu Lake region. The results showed that total nitrogen and ammonium nitrogen concentration in the surface water of the SCU treatment in the base period were higher, and those for RCU and RBB were lower than in the CN treatment. The cumulative ammonia volatilization during the whole rice season varied among different types of slow-release nitrogen fertilizers from 3.84% to 28.17% of the total N applied. The nitrogen loss from ammonia volatilization using the three slow-release nitrogen fertilizers was decreased when compared with conventional split fertilization. The ammonia volatilization loss exhibited the following relationship for the treatments:CN, B-SCU > BF-SCU, BF-RBB, BF-RCU, B-RBB, and B-RCU. When the slow-release nitrogen fertilizers were applied in single base fertilization, the total ammonia volatilization for the SCU was significantly higher than those for the RCU and RBB, while no significant differences were detected when these three slow-release fertilizers were combined with panicle fertilizer. Moreover, although the ammonia volatilization of BF-SCU was lower than that of B-SCU, those of BF-RCU and BF-RBB were higher than those with the B-RCU and B-RBB treatments, respectively. There are no significant differences for nitrogen volatilization when any of these three different fertilizers are applied as B or BF. The results for the emissions during ammonia volatilization during different stages indicated that the ammonia volatilization of SCU at the basal-tillering fertilization stage (7.54%) and the tillering-panicle fertilization stage (16.04%) were higher than those of the panicle fertilization-mature stage. The N loss from ammonia volatilization for RBB in the base-tillering fertilization stage (2.91%) increased more than in the tillering-panicle fertilization stage and panicle fertilization-mature stage. For RCU treatment, the highest rate for ammonia volatilization was detected at the panicle fertilization-mature stage (2.75%). Compared with the single base fertilization mode, ammonia volatilization during the panicle fertilization-mature stage was increased when combined with panicle fertilizer (BF) for the slow-release fertilizer. There was no obvious correlation between the N loss with ammonia volatilization for the three slow-release nitrogen fertilizers and the concentration of ammonium nitrogen in surface water during the panicle fertilization-mature stage.

摘要

为了减少稻田氨挥发,评估了七种处理方式。其中包括三种缓释氮肥[硫包膜尿素(SCU);树脂包膜尿素(RCU);控释掺混肥料(RBB)],两种施肥模式[一次性基肥(B)和与穗肥配施(BF)],以及常规分次施肥(CN)。利用太湖地区带有施肥播种机构的水稻插秧机,研究了缓释氮肥侧深施肥对氨挥发和地表水氮素动态的影响。结果表明,基肥期SCU处理地表水总氮和铵态氮浓度较高,RCU和RBB处理低于CN处理。整个水稻季累积氨挥发量在不同类型缓释氮肥间变化,占施氮总量的3.84%至28.17%。与常规分次施肥相比,三种缓释氮肥的氨挥发氮损失降低。氨挥发损失表现为以下处理关系:CN、B - SCU>BF - SCU、BF - RBB、BF - RCU、B - RBB和B - RCU。当缓释氮肥采用一次性基肥施用时,SCU的总氨挥发量显著高于RCU和RBB,而这三种缓释肥料与穗肥配施时未检测到显著差异。此外,虽然BF - SCU的氨挥发低于B - SCU,但BF - RCU和BF - RBB的氨挥发分别高于B - RCU和B - RBB处理。这三种不同肥料以B或BF方式施用时,氮挥发无显著差异。不同阶段氨挥发排放结果表明,SCU在基肥 - 分蘖期施肥阶段(7.54%)和分蘖 - 穗期施肥阶段(16.04%)的氨挥发高于穗期施肥 - 成熟期。RBB在基肥 - 分蘖期施肥阶段(2.91%)的氨挥发氮损失增幅大于分蘖 - 穗期施肥阶段和穗期施肥 - 成熟期。对于RCU处理,氨挥发率最高出现在穗期施肥 - 成熟期(2.75%)。与一次性基肥施肥模式相比,缓释肥料与穗肥配施(BF)时,穗期施肥 - 成熟期的氨挥发增加。三种缓释氮肥的氨挥发氮损失与穗期施肥 - 成熟期地表水铵态氮浓度之间无明显相关性。

相似文献

1
[Control Effect of Side Deep Fertilization with Slow-release Fertilizer on Ammonia Volatilization from Paddy Fields].[缓释肥料侧深施肥对稻田氨挥发的控制效应]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2017 Dec 8;38(12):5326-5332. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201705030.
2
[Effect of Deep Fertilization with Slow/Controlled Release Fertilizer on N Fate in Clayey Soil Wheat Field].[缓释/控释肥料深施对黏土麦田氮素去向的影响]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2023 Jan 8;44(1):473-481. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202203255.
3
Comparing ammonia volatilization between conventional and slow-release nitrogen fertilizers in paddy fields in the Taihu Lake region.比较太湖地区稻田中常规氮肥和缓释氮肥的氨挥发。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Mar;27(8):8386-8394. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-07536-2. Epub 2020 Jan 4.
4
[Comparing the ammonia volatilization characteristic of two typical paddy soil with total wheat straw returning in Taihu Lake region].[太湖地区两种典型水稻土全量麦秸还田氨挥发特征比较]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2013 Jan;34(1):27-33.
5
[Assessment of Gaseous Nitrogen (NH and NO) Mitigation After the Application of a Range of New Nitrogen Fertilizers in Summer Maize Cultivation].[夏季玉米种植中一系列新型氮肥施用后气态氮(NH和NO)减排评估]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2016 Aug 8;37(8):2906-2913. doi: 10.13277/j.hjkx.2016.08.011.
6
Reducing nitrogen losses through ammonia volatilization and surface runoff to improve apparent nitrogen recovery of double cropping of late rice using controlled release urea.通过减少氨挥发和地表径流造成的氮损失,以提高晚稻双季种植中使用控释尿素时的表观氮素回收率。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Apr;24(12):11722-11733. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-8825-8. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
7
[Characteristics of ammonia volatilization and nitrous oxide emission from a paddy soil under continuous application of different slow/controlled release urea.].[不同缓释/控释尿素连续施用下稻田土壤氨挥发和氧化亚氮排放特征。]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2016 Jun;27(6):1901-1909. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201606.039.
8
Ammonia volatilization from a Chinese cabbage field under different nitrogen treatments in the Taihu Lake Basin, China.中国太湖流域不同氮处理下白菜地的氨挥发
J Environ Sci (China). 2015 Dec;38:14-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2015.04.028. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
9
[Effects of Wheat Straw Hydrochar and Its Modified Product on Rice Yield and Ammonia Volatilization from Paddy Fields].[小麦秸秆生物炭及其改性产物对水稻产量和稻田氨挥发的影响]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2021 Jul 8;42(7):3451-3457. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202010086.
10
[Effect of Straw Incorporation and Domestic Sewage Irrigation on Ammonia Volatilization from Paddy Fields].秸秆还田与生活污水灌溉对稻田氨挥发的影响
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2016 Oct 8;37(10):3963-3970. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.2016.10.039.