Suppr超能文献

脊柱外科医生对术中硬脊膜切开处理的偏好:当前处理方式的调查

Preferences of Spine Surgeons With Regard to Management of Intraoperative Durotomy: A Survey of Current Management.

作者信息

Pendi Arif, Wang Jeffrey C, Bederman Stacey Samuel, Farhan Saifal-Deen, Bhatia Nitin N, Lee Yu-Po, Ashraf Jahanzeb, Acosta Frank L

机构信息

School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

出版信息

Clin Spine Surg. 2018 Oct;31(8):E381-E385. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000673.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

This was a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine spine surgeons' preferences for the intraoperative and postoperative management of intraoperative durotomy (IDT) in decompression and spinal fusion surgeries.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Management guidelines for IDT remain elusive. Traditionally, management consists of intraoperative suturing and postoperative bed rest. However, preferences of North American spine surgeons may vary, particularly according to type of surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Spine surgeons of AO Spine North America (AOSNA) were surveyed online anonymously to determine which techniques they preferred to manage IDT in decompression and fusion. Differences in preferences according to surgery type were compared using the Fisher exact test. A series of linear regressions were conducted to identify demographic predictors of spine surgeons' preferences.

RESULTS

Of 217 respondents, most were male (95%), orthopedic surgeons (70%), practiced at an academic center (50%), were in practice 0-19 years (71%) and operated on 100-300 patients per year (70%). The majority of surgeons applied sutures (93%-96%) and sealant (82%-84%). Surgeons also used grafts (26%-27%), drains (18%), other techniques (4%-5%), blood patch (2%-3%), or no intraoperative management (1%-2%). Postoperatively, most surgeons recommended bed rest (74%-75%). Antibiotics (22%), immediate mobilization (18%-20%), reoperation (14%-16%), other techniques (6%), or no postoperative management (5%) were also preferred. Management preferences did not vary significantly between decompression and fusion surgeries (all P-values>0.05). Specialty, practice facility, years in practice, and patients per year were identified as independent predictors of IDT management preferences (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although North American spine surgeons preferred to manage IDT with sutures augmented by sealant followed by bed rest after surgery, less common techniques were also preferred during the intraoperative and postoperative periods. Notably, intraoperative and postoperative IDT management preferences did not change in accordance to the type of surgery being conducted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V.

摘要

研究设计

这是一项横断面研究。

目的

本研究的目的是确定脊柱外科医生在减压和脊柱融合手术中对术中硬脊膜切开术(IDT)的术中及术后管理的偏好。

背景数据总结

IDT的管理指南仍不明确。传统上,管理方法包括术中缝合和术后卧床休息。然而,北美脊柱外科医生的偏好可能有所不同,特别是根据手术类型。

材料与方法

对北美AO脊柱学会(AOSNA)的脊柱外科医生进行在线匿名调查,以确定他们在减压和融合手术中管理IDT时更喜欢哪种技术。使用Fisher精确检验比较不同手术类型的偏好差异。进行了一系列线性回归分析,以确定脊柱外科医生偏好的人口统计学预测因素。

结果

在217名受访者中,大多数为男性(95%),骨科医生(70%),在学术中心执业(50%),从业0 - 19年(71%),每年手术100 - 300例患者(70%)。大多数外科医生使用缝线(93% - 96%)和密封剂(82% - 84%)。外科医生还使用移植物(26% - 27%)、引流管(18%)、其他技术(4% - 5%)、血液补片(2% - 3%),或不进行术中处理(1% - 2%)。术后,大多数外科医生建议卧床休息(74% - 75%)。抗生素(22%)、立即活动(18% - 20%)、再次手术(14% - 16%)、其他技术(6%)或不进行术后处理(5%)也受到青睐。减压手术和融合手术之间的管理偏好没有显著差异(所有P值>0.05)。专业、执业机构、从业年限和每年手术患者数量被确定为IDT管理偏好的独立预测因素(P<0.05)。

结论

尽管北美脊柱外科医生更喜欢用密封剂辅助缝线来管理IDT,术后再卧床休息,但在术中和术后也倾向于使用不太常见的技术。值得注意的是,术中和术后IDT的管理偏好并未根据所进行的手术类型而改变。

证据级别

V级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验