National Bowel Research Centre and GI Physiology Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
National Bowel Research Centre and GI Physiology Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Feb;17(3):477-485.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.06.037. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Anorectal manometry is a common test of anal tone and contractility. However, existing measures are often criticized for their poor ability to detect functional differences between individuals with presumably normal sphincter function and individuals with fecal incontinence. We investigated whether new measures, derived from high-resolution anal manometry (HR-ARM), more accurately identify incontinent women with abnormal sphincter function than measures from conventional anal manometry (C-ARM).
We performed a prospective HR-ARM study of 85 healthy female volunteers (median age 41 years; range 18-68 years) and 403 women with fecal incontinence (median age 55; range 18-91 years) from June 2013 through December 2015. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of conventional measurements of contractility (C-ARM squeeze increment) and tone (C-ARM resting pressure) (the reference standards), with HR-ARM measures (HR-ARM squeeze increment, HR-ARM contractile integral, HR-ARM resting average, HR-ARM rest integral). We also investigated associations between symptom severity and structural sphincter integrity.
We identified anal hypocontractility in 129 women with fecal incontinence using the C-ARM squeeze increment (32% sensitivity; likelihood ratio, 6.4), in 189 women using the HR-ARM squeeze increment (47% sensitivity; likelihood ratio, 9.4), and in 220 women using the HR-ARM contractile integral (55% sensitivity; likelihood ratio, 11.0). In contrast, HR-ARM measures of anal tone did not particularly outperform conventional measures (31% sensitivity for HR-ARM resting average vs 28% for C-ARM resting pressure). Ninety-eight of the 206 patients with fecal incontinence who were classified as having normal anal function, based on C-ARM measures, were reclassified as having abnormal function based on HR-ARM measures.
In a prospective study of healthy women and women with fecal incontinence, we demonstrated that the newly developed HR-ARM contractile integral increased the sensitivity of detection of anal hypocontractility, from 32% to 55%, compared with conventional measurements of squeeze.
肛肠测压是一种常见的肛管测压方法,用于评估肛管的收缩力和张力。然而,现有的测压方法往往因对具有正常括约肌功能的个体和失禁个体之间的功能差异的检测能力有限而受到批评。我们研究了新的基于高分辨率肛肠测压(HR-ARM)的测压方法是否比常规肛肠测压(C-ARM)更能准确识别具有异常括约肌功能的失禁女性。
我们进行了一项前瞻性 HR-ARM 研究,纳入了 85 名健康女性志愿者(中位年龄 41 岁,范围 18-68 岁)和 2013 年 6 月至 2015 年 12 月期间的 403 名失禁女性(中位年龄 55 岁,范围 18-91 岁)。我们比较了传统的收缩力测量(C-ARM 收缩增量)和张力测量(C-ARM 静息压)(参考标准)与 HR-ARM 测量(HR-ARM 收缩增量、HR-ARM 收缩积分、HR-ARM 静息平均压、HR-ARM 静息积分)的诊断准确性。我们还研究了症状严重程度与结构括约肌完整性之间的关系。
我们使用 C-ARM 收缩增量识别出 129 名失禁女性存在肛管收缩力不足(敏感性 32%,似然比 6.4),使用 HR-ARM 收缩增量识别出 189 名失禁女性存在肛管收缩力不足(敏感性 47%,似然比 9.4),使用 HR-ARM 收缩积分识别出 220 名失禁女性存在肛管收缩力不足(敏感性 55%,似然比 11.0)。相比之下,HR-ARM 测量的肛管张力并没有明显优于传统测量方法(HR-ARM 静息平均压的敏感性为 31%,而 C-ARM 静息压的敏感性为 28%)。在基于 C-ARM 测量被归类为具有正常肛管功能的 206 名失禁患者中,有 98 名根据 HR-ARM 测量被重新归类为具有异常功能。
在一项对健康女性和失禁女性的前瞻性研究中,我们发现与传统的收缩测量相比,新开发的 HR-ARM 收缩积分增加了肛管收缩力不足的检测敏感性,从 32%增加到 55%。