University of North Carolina Kidney Center and.
University of North Carolina School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018 Nov 7;13(11):1693-1702. doi: 10.2215/CJN.06200518. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
In people with type 2 diabetes, aggressive control of glycemia, BP, and lipids have resulted in conflicting short-term (<5 years) kidney outcomes. We aimed to determine the long-term kidney effects of these interventions.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) was a multifactorial intervention study in people with type 2 diabetes at high risk for cardiovascular disease (=10,251), to examine the effects of intensive glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c <6.0% versus 7%-7.9%), BP control (systolic BP <120 mm Hg versus <140 mm Hg) or fenofibrate versus placebo added to simvastatin on cardiovascular events and death. The glycemia trial lasted 3.7 years and participants were followed for another 6.5 years in ACCORDION, the ACCORD Follow-On Study. The primary composite kidney outcome was defined as incident macroalbuminuria, creatinine doubling, need for dialysis, or death by any cause. Cox proportional hazards regression estimated the effect of each intervention on the composite outcome and individual components. In secondary outcome analyses, competing risk regression was used to account for the risk of death in incident kidney outcomes. Analyses were adjusted for sociodemographics, randomization groups, and clinical factors.
There were 988 cases of incident macroalbuminuria, 954 with doubling of creatinine, 351 requiring dialysis, and 1905 deaths. Hazard ratios (HRs) for the composite outcome with intensive glycemic, BP control, and fenofibrate use compared with standard therapy were 0.92 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.86 to 0.98), 1.16 (95% CI, 1.05 to 1.28), and 1.16 (95% CI, 1.06 to 1.27). Multivariable, secondary outcome analyses showed that in the glycemia trial, only macroalbuminuria was significantly decreased (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.77). In the BP and lipid trials, only creatinine doubling was affected (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.30 to 2.06 and HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.61 to 2.49, respectively).
In people with type 2 diabetes at high risk for cardiovascular disease, intensive glycemic control may result in a long-term reduction in macroalbuminuria; however, intensive BP control and fenofibrates may increase the risk for adverse kidney events.
在 2 型糖尿病患者中,积极控制血糖、血压和血脂会导致短期(<5 年)肾脏结果出现冲突。我们旨在确定这些干预措施的长期肾脏影响。
设计、设置、参与者和测量:行动控制心血管风险在糖尿病(ACCORD)是一个多因素干预研究在 2 型糖尿病患者心血管疾病高风险(=10251),以检查强化血糖控制(糖化血红蛋白<6.0%与 7%-7.9%),血压控制(收缩压<120mmHg 与<140mmHg)或非诺贝特与辛伐他汀联合使用对心血管事件和死亡的影响。血糖试验持续 3.7 年,参与者在 ACCORDION(ACCORD 随访研究)中又随访了 6.5 年。主要复合肾脏结局定义为新发大量白蛋白尿、肌酐翻倍、需要透析或任何原因导致的死亡。Cox 比例风险回归估计了每种干预措施对复合结局和个体成分的影响。在次要结局分析中,竞争风险回归用于考虑肾脏结局发生时的死亡风险。分析调整了社会人口统计学、随机分组和临床因素。
有 988 例新发大量白蛋白尿、954 例肌酐翻倍、351 例需要透析和 1905 例死亡。与标准治疗相比,强化血糖、血压控制和非诺贝特治疗的复合结局的危险比(HR)分别为 0.92(95%置信区间[95%CI],0.86 至 0.98)、1.16(95%CI,1.05 至 1.28)和 1.16(95%CI,1.06 至 1.27)。多变量次要结局分析显示,在血糖试验中,只有大量白蛋白尿显著降低(HR,0.68;95%CI,0.59 至 0.77)。在血压和血脂试验中,只有肌酐翻倍受到影响(HR,1.64;95%CI,1.30 至 2.06 和 HR,2.00;95%CI,1.61 至 2.49)。
在心血管疾病风险较高的 2 型糖尿病患者中,强化血糖控制可能会长期降低大量白蛋白尿;然而,强化血压控制和非诺贝特可能会增加不良肾脏事件的风险。