Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.
Division of Biostatistics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.
Diabetes Care. 2020 Aug;43(8):1878-1884. doi: 10.2337/dc19-2047. Epub 2020 May 4.
To examine whether low baseline diastolic blood pressure (DBP) modifies the effects of intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) lowering on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Blood Pressure trial (ACCORD BP), a two-by-two factorial randomized controlled trial, examined effects of SBP (<120 vs. <140 mmHg) and glycemic (HbA <6% vs. 7.0-7.9% [<42 vs. 53-63 mmol/mol]) control on cardiovascular events in T2DM ( = 4,731). We examined whether effects of SBP control on cardiovascular composite were modified by baseline DBP and glycemic control.
Intensive SBP lowering decreased the risk of the cardiovascular composite (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76 [95% CI 0.59-0.98]) in the standard glycemic arm but not in the intensive glycemic arm (HR 1.06 [95% CI 0.81-1.40]). Spline regression models relating the effects of the intervention on the cardiovascular composite across the range of baseline DBP did not show evidence of effect modification by low baseline DBP for the cardiovascular composite in the standard or intensive glycemic arms. The relation between the effect of the intensive SBP intervention and baseline DBP was similar between glycemic arms for the cardiovascular composite three-way interaction ( = 0.83).
In persons with T2DM, intensive SBP lowering decreased the risk of cardiovascular composite end point irrespective of baseline DBP in the setting of standard glycemic control. Hence, low baseline DBP should not be an impediment to intensive SBP lowering in patients with T2DM treated with guideline-recommended standard glycemic control.
研究基础舒张压(DBP)较低是否会改变强化收缩压(SBP)降低对 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)心血管结局的影响。
ACTION TO CONTROL CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN DIABETES BLOOD PRESSURE 试验(ACCORD BP)是一项两因素、两水平的随机对照临床试验,研究了 SBP(<120 与 <140mmHg)和血糖(HbA<6%与 7.0-7.9% [<42 与 53-63mmol/mol])控制对 T2DM 心血管事件的影响( = 4731)。我们研究了 SBP 控制对心血管复合终点的影响是否受基础 DBP 和血糖控制的影响。
强化 SBP 降低降低了标准血糖控制组心血管复合终点的风险(危险比 [HR] 0.76 [95% CI 0.59-0.98]),但在强化血糖控制组中没有(HR 1.06 [95% CI 0.81-1.40])。与基线 DBP 范围相关的干预对心血管复合终点影响的样条回归模型,在标准或强化血糖控制组中,均未显示低基线 DBP 对心血管复合终点的影响存在修饰作用。强化 SBP 干预效果与基线 DBP 之间的关系,在血糖控制两组之间的心血管复合终点三向交互作用( = 0.83)相似。
在标准血糖控制的情况下,对于 T2DM 患者,强化 SBP 降低可降低心血管复合终点的风险,无论基线 DBP 如何。因此,对于接受指南推荐的标准血糖控制的 T2DM 患者,低基线 DBP 不应成为强化 SBP 降低的障碍。