• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Influence of Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure on the Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering on Cardiovascular Outcomes and All-Cause Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes.基础舒张压对强化降压对 2 型糖尿病心血管结局和全因死亡率影响的影响。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Aug;43(8):1878-1884. doi: 10.2337/dc19-2047. Epub 2020 May 4.
2
Effects of Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Lowering on Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on Standard Glycemic Control and in Those Without Diabetes Mellitus: Reconciling Results From ACCORD BP and SPRINT.强化收缩压降压治疗对标准血糖控制的 2 型糖尿病患者及无糖尿病患者心血管事件和死亡率的影响:来自 ACCORD BP 和 SPRINT 的结果再分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Sep 18;7(18):e009326. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009326.
3
Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering in Patients With and Patients Without Type 2 Diabetes: A Pooled Analysis From Two Randomized Trials.伴有和不伴有 2 型糖尿病的患者强化降压治疗:两项随机试验的汇总分析。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jun;41(6):1142-1148. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1722. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
4
Influence of Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure on Effects of Intensive Compared With Standard Blood Pressure Control.基础舒张压对强化与标准血压控制效果影响的研究。
Circulation. 2018 Jan 9;137(2):134-143. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030848. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
5
Association Between Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure and the Efficacy of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure-Lowering Therapy.基础舒张压与强化降压治疗与标准降压治疗疗效的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2128980. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28980.
6
Blood pressure targets for hypertension in people with diabetes mellitus.糖尿病患者高血压的血压目标
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 30;2013(10):CD008277. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008277.pub2.
7
Blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes and high cardiovascular risk.患有糖尿病和心血管疾病高风险患者的血压与心血管结局。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jun 21;39(24):2255-2262. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx809.
8
Intervention at lower blood pressure levels to achieve target goals in type 2 diabetes: PRADID (PResión Arterial en DIabéticos tipo Dos) study.在2型糖尿病中降低血压水平以实现目标值的干预措施:PRADID(2型糖尿病患者的动脉血压)研究
J Hypertens. 2004 Jan;22(1):217-22. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200401000-00032.
9
Cardiovascular outcomes and achieved blood pressure in patients with and without diabetes at high cardiovascular risk.心血管结局和高心血管风险患者的糖尿病与非糖尿病患者的血压控制情况。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jul 1;40(25):2032-2043. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz149.
10
Effects of blood-pressure-lowering treatment on outcome incidence in hypertension: 10 - Should blood pressure management differ in hypertensive patients with and without diabetes mellitus? Overview and meta-analyses of randomized trials.降压治疗对高血压患者结局发生率的影响:10 - 糖尿病合并与未合并高血压患者的血压管理是否应有所不同?随机试验的综述与荟萃分析
J Hypertens. 2017 May;35(5):922-944. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001276.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting hypertension in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Insights from a nomogram model.预测2型糖尿病患者的高血压:列线图模型的见解
World J Diabetes. 2025 Jul 15;16(7):107501. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i7.107501.
2
Association of baseline and trajectory of triglyceride-glucose index with the incidence of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus.甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数的基线及变化轨迹与2型糖尿病心血管自主神经病变发生率的关联
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2025 Feb 7;24(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12933-025-02622-x.
3
10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.10. 心血管疾病与风险管理:2025年糖尿病护理标准。
Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan 1;48(Supplement_1):S207-S238. doi: 10.2337/dc25-S010.
4
Baseline Diastolic BP and BP-Lowering Effects on Cardiovascular Outcomes and All-Cause Mortality: A Meta-Analysis.基线舒张压及血压降低对心血管结局和全因死亡率的影响:一项荟萃分析
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2025 May 1;36(5):911-922. doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000539. Epub 2024 Nov 8.
5
The diastolic blood pressure J-curve revisited: An update.舒张压 J 曲线再探讨:最新进展
Am Heart J Plus. 2021 Oct 28;12:100065. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2021.100065. eCollection 2021 Dec.
6
Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering in Individuals With Low Diastolic Blood Pressure and Elevated Troponin Levels in SPRINT.SPRINT 中舒张压低和肌钙蛋白水平升高的个体强化降压治疗。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Mar 19;13(6):e032493. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032493. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
7
Advances in secondary prevention mechanisms of macrovascular complications in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a comprehensive review.2 型糖尿病患者大血管并发症二级预防机制的研究进展:综述。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Mar 4;29(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01739-1.
8
10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024.10. 心血管疾病与风险管理:2024年糖尿病护理标准。
Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(Suppl 1):S179-S218. doi: 10.2337/dc24-S010.
9
Treatment and Control of Hypertension Among Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease, 2011 to 2019.2011 年至 2019 年期间慢性肾脏病成人高血压的治疗和控制。
Hypertension. 2023 Dec;80(12):2533-2543. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.123.21523. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
10
Answering Clinical Questions Using Machine Learning: Should We Look at Diastolic Blood Pressure When Tailoring Blood Pressure Control?使用机器学习回答临床问题:在定制血压控制方案时,我们是否应该关注舒张压?
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 15;11(24):7454. doi: 10.3390/jcm11247454.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Lowering on Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on Standard Glycemic Control and in Those Without Diabetes Mellitus: Reconciling Results From ACCORD BP and SPRINT.强化收缩压降压治疗对标准血糖控制的 2 型糖尿病患者及无糖尿病患者心血管事件和死亡率的影响:来自 ACCORD BP 和 SPRINT 的结果再分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Sep 18;7(18):e009326. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009326.
2
2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension.2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲高血压学会动脉高血压管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Sep 1;39(33):3021-3104. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339.
3
Influence of Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure on Effects of Intensive Compared With Standard Blood Pressure Control.基础舒张压对强化与标准血压控制效果影响的研究。
Circulation. 2018 Jan 9;137(2):134-143. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030848. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
4
Erratum. Glycemic Targets. Sec. 6. In . Diabetes Care 2017;40(Suppl. 1);S48-S56.勘误。血糖目标。第6节。载于《糖尿病护理》2017年;40(增刊1);S48 - S56。
Diabetes Care. 2017 Jul;40(7):985. doi: 10.2337/dc17-er07a. Epub 2017 May 18.
5
Cardiovascular event rates and mortality according to achieved systolic and diastolic blood pressure in patients with stable coronary artery disease: an international cohort study.根据稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者的收缩压和舒张压达标情况评估心血管事件发生率和死亡率:一项国际队列研究。
Lancet. 2016 Oct 29;388(10056):2142-2152. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31326-5. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
6
Diastolic Blood Pressure, Subclinical Myocardial Damage, and Cardiac Events: Implications for Blood Pressure Control.舒张压、亚临床心肌损伤与心脏事件:对血压控制的启示
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Oct 18;68(16):1713-1722. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.07.754. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
7
The J-Curve Phenomenon in Hypertension.高血压中的J曲线现象
Pulse (Basel). 2016 Jul;4(1):49-60. doi: 10.1159/000446922. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
8
Blood pressure and complications in individuals with type 2 diabetes and no previous cardiovascular disease: national population based cohort study.2型糖尿病且无既往心血管疾病患者的血压与并发症:基于全国人群的队列研究
BMJ. 2016 Aug 4;354:i4070. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4070.
9
Excess Mortality among Persons with Type 2 Diabetes.2 型糖尿病患者的超额死亡率。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 29;373(18):1720-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504347.
10
Arterial stiffness in diabetes mellitus.糖尿病中的动脉僵硬度。
Atherosclerosis. 2015 Feb;238(2):370-9. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.12.023. Epub 2014 Dec 20.

基础舒张压对强化降压对 2 型糖尿病心血管结局和全因死亡率影响的影响。

The Influence of Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure on the Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering on Cardiovascular Outcomes and All-Cause Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes.

机构信息

Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.

Division of Biostatistics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2020 Aug;43(8):1878-1884. doi: 10.2337/dc19-2047. Epub 2020 May 4.

DOI:10.2337/dc19-2047
PMID:32366577
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7372050/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether low baseline diastolic blood pressure (DBP) modifies the effects of intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) lowering on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Blood Pressure trial (ACCORD BP), a two-by-two factorial randomized controlled trial, examined effects of SBP (<120 vs. <140 mmHg) and glycemic (HbA <6% vs. 7.0-7.9% [<42 vs. 53-63 mmol/mol]) control on cardiovascular events in T2DM ( = 4,731). We examined whether effects of SBP control on cardiovascular composite were modified by baseline DBP and glycemic control.

RESULTS

Intensive SBP lowering decreased the risk of the cardiovascular composite (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76 [95% CI 0.59-0.98]) in the standard glycemic arm but not in the intensive glycemic arm (HR 1.06 [95% CI 0.81-1.40]). Spline regression models relating the effects of the intervention on the cardiovascular composite across the range of baseline DBP did not show evidence of effect modification by low baseline DBP for the cardiovascular composite in the standard or intensive glycemic arms. The relation between the effect of the intensive SBP intervention and baseline DBP was similar between glycemic arms for the cardiovascular composite three-way interaction ( = 0.83).

CONCLUSIONS

In persons with T2DM, intensive SBP lowering decreased the risk of cardiovascular composite end point irrespective of baseline DBP in the setting of standard glycemic control. Hence, low baseline DBP should not be an impediment to intensive SBP lowering in patients with T2DM treated with guideline-recommended standard glycemic control.

摘要

目的

研究基础舒张压(DBP)较低是否会改变强化收缩压(SBP)降低对 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)心血管结局的影响。

研究设计和方法

ACTION TO CONTROL CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN DIABETES BLOOD PRESSURE 试验(ACCORD BP)是一项两因素、两水平的随机对照临床试验,研究了 SBP(<120 与 <140mmHg)和血糖(HbA<6%与 7.0-7.9% [<42 与 53-63mmol/mol])控制对 T2DM 心血管事件的影响( = 4731)。我们研究了 SBP 控制对心血管复合终点的影响是否受基础 DBP 和血糖控制的影响。

结果

强化 SBP 降低降低了标准血糖控制组心血管复合终点的风险(危险比 [HR] 0.76 [95% CI 0.59-0.98]),但在强化血糖控制组中没有(HR 1.06 [95% CI 0.81-1.40])。与基线 DBP 范围相关的干预对心血管复合终点影响的样条回归模型,在标准或强化血糖控制组中,均未显示低基线 DBP 对心血管复合终点的影响存在修饰作用。强化 SBP 干预效果与基线 DBP 之间的关系,在血糖控制两组之间的心血管复合终点三向交互作用( = 0.83)相似。

结论

在标准血糖控制的情况下,对于 T2DM 患者,强化 SBP 降低可降低心血管复合终点的风险,无论基线 DBP 如何。因此,对于接受指南推荐的标准血糖控制的 T2DM 患者,低基线 DBP 不应成为强化 SBP 降低的障碍。