• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经鼻腔骨内牵引钩的硬性外牵张治疗面中部发育不全。

Rigid External Distraction with Intranasal Bone-borne Traction Hooks for Midfacial Hypoplasia.

机构信息

Center for Cleft Lip and Palate Treatment, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Department of Stomatology, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 2;8(1):9948. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28068-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-28068-8
PMID:29967456
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6028474/
Abstract

Rigid external distraction is currently performed to correct cases of severe maxillary hypoplasia. As an improvement of this technique, we propose the use of an intranasal bone-borne traction hook. This study is a retrospective chart review of the intranasal bone-borne traction hooks used in the treatment of severe maxillary hypoplasia. There were 110 patients treated with the hooks from 2005 to 2017. The maximum traction force was 7.75 kg, and there were few complications encountered during distraction. There were 76 patients who had the hooks removed under local anaesthesia. A cephalometric analysis was conducted in 56 patients. The average advancement of A-point was 9.9 ± 4.2 mm, 8.4 ± 2.5 mm, 11.0 ± 3.7 mm, 17.9 ± 4.4 mm for the trans-sutural distraction osteogenesis (DO), maxillary anterior segment DO, Le Fort I osteotomy DO and Le Fort III/II osteotomy DO, respectively. The average changes of sella-nasion-point A (SNA) were 8.89 ± 4.30 degrees, 8.21 ± 3.17 degrees, 10.49 ± 3.26 degrees, and 15.10 ± 4.00 degrees, respectively. The A point-nasion-B point (ANB) also showed increases in all procedures with P < 0.001. In conclusion, this technique sufficiently advances the midface and ensures the scars are concealed in the nasal base. The traction hook can bear a large traction force, causes minimal complications and is easily removed.

摘要

目前采用硬性外牵引来矫正严重上颌发育不全。作为对该技术的改进,我们提出使用经鼻骨内牵引钩。本研究回顾性分析了 2005 年至 2017 年间使用经鼻骨内牵引钩治疗严重上颌发育不全的 110 例患者。最大牵引力为 7.75kg,牵引过程中并发症较少。76 例患者在局部麻醉下取出牵引钩。对 56 例患者进行了头影测量分析。A 点的平均前徙量分别为经缝牵引成骨术(DO)、上颌前段 DO、Le Fort I 截骨术 DO 和 Le Fort III/II 截骨术 DO 的 9.9±4.2mm、8.4±2.5mm、11.0±3.7mm 和 17.9±4.4mm。蝶鞍点 A(SNA)的平均变化分别为 8.89±4.30 度、8.21±3.17 度、10.49±3.26 度和 15.10±4.00 度。所有手术中 A 点-前鼻棘点-B 点(ANB)也均有增加,P 值均<0.001。总之,该技术可充分前徙上颌骨,并确保疤痕隐藏在鼻基底。牵引钩可承受较大的牵引力,引起的并发症较少,且易于取出。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da39/6028474/5f44fe40de82/41598_2018_28068_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da39/6028474/b1cf13564002/41598_2018_28068_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da39/6028474/43408cf6a226/41598_2018_28068_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da39/6028474/5f44fe40de82/41598_2018_28068_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da39/6028474/b1cf13564002/41598_2018_28068_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da39/6028474/43408cf6a226/41598_2018_28068_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da39/6028474/5f44fe40de82/41598_2018_28068_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Rigid External Distraction with Intranasal Bone-borne Traction Hooks for Midfacial Hypoplasia.经鼻腔骨内牵引钩的硬性外牵张治疗面中部发育不全。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 2;8(1):9948. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28068-8.
2
Sutural distraction osteogenesis (SDO) versus osteotomy distraction osteogenesis (ODO) for midfacial advancement: a new technique and primary clinical report.用于面中部前移的缝牵引成骨术(SDO)与截骨牵引成骨术(ODO):一种新技术及初步临床报告
J Craniofac Surg. 2005 Jul;16(4):537-48. doi: 10.1097/01.scs.0000159083.21931.c5.
3
Maxillary distraction osteogenesis in cleft lip and palate cases with midface hypoplasia using rigid external distractor: an alternative technique.使用坚固外部牵张器对唇腭裂伴面中部发育不全病例进行上颌骨牵张成骨:一种替代技术。
J Craniofac Surg. 2014 May;25(3):746-51. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000735.
4
Endoscopically assisted intraoral modified Le Fort II type midfacial advancement using piezoelectric surgery and an intraoperative RED system.使用压电手术和术中RED系统进行内镜辅助经口改良Le Fort II型面中部前移术
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Feb;71(2):e93-103. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.10.007.
5
Le Fort III distraction using rotation advancement of the midface in patients with cleft lip and palate.唇腭裂患者采用面中部旋转推进法行 Le Fort III 牵张。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Dec;132(6):1532-1541. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a97ebc.
6
A novel anchorage technique for transnasal traction in rigid external maxillary distraction.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Dec;51(8):e269-71. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2012.10.006. Epub 2012 Nov 3.
7
Maxillary distraction osteogenesis using Le Fort I osteotomy without intraoperative down-fracture.采用Le Fort I型截骨术且术中不进行下颌骨骨折的上颌骨牵张成骨术。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Jun;35(6):493-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2006.01.008. Epub 2006 Feb 28.
8
Midface correction in patients with Crouzon syndrome is Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis with a rigid external distraction device the gold standard?颅面骨发育不全综合征患者的中面部矫正采用 Le Fort III 骨切开术联合刚性外牵引器,是金标准吗?
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Mar;47(3):420-430. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.11.028. Epub 2018 Dec 31.
9
Anterior maxillary segmental distraction for correction of maxillary hypoplasia and dental crowding in cleft palate patients: a preliminary report.腭裂患者上颌前段骨段牵张成骨矫正上颌骨发育不足及牙列拥挤:初步报告。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Dec;38(12):1237-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.06.028. Epub 2009 Aug 31.
10
Rigid External Le Fort I Distraction Followed by Secondary Bone Grafting for Maxillary Advancements in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate.唇腭裂患者上颌前突的坚固外Le Fort I型牵引成骨联合二期植骨术
J Craniofac Surg. 2019 Oct;30(7):1974-1978. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005620.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparative Study of Skeletal and Dental Outcome between Transcutaneous External Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis and Conventional Rigid External Device in Treating Cleft Lip and Palate Patients.经皮外上颌骨牵引成骨术与传统坚固外固定装置治疗唇腭裂患者的骨骼和牙齿结局比较研究
J Pers Med. 2022 Jun 29;12(7):1062. doi: 10.3390/jpm12071062.
2
Smooth Extubation Techniques in Pediatric Patients After LeFort I Osteotomy.儿童LeFort I型截骨术后的平稳拔管技术
Cureus. 2021 Apr 24;13(4):e14659. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14659.

本文引用的文献

1
Alar Pinning in Rigid External Distraction for Midfacial Hypoplasia.用于面中部发育不全的坚固外牵引成骨中的鼻翼固定术
Ann Plast Surg. 2017 Sep;79(3):275-279. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001113.
2
Midface Distraction Osteogenesis Using a Modified External Device With Elastic Distraction for Crouzon Syndrome.使用改良外部装置及弹性牵引的面中部牵张成骨术治疗克鲁宗综合征
J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Sep;28(6):1573-1577. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003377.
3
Measurement of Distraction Force in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients During Le Fort I Maxillary Advancement With Rigid External Distraction.
J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Mar;28(2):406-412. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003327.
4
Three-dimensional quantitative evaluation of midfacial skeletal changes after trans-sutural distraction osteogenesis for midfacial hypoplasia in growing patients with cleft lip and palate.唇腭裂生长发育期患者经缝牵引成骨治疗面中部发育不全后,对面中部骨骼变化的三维定量评估
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015 Nov;43(9):1749-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.08.027. Epub 2015 Sep 6.
5
Trans-Sutural Distraction Osteogenesis for Midfacial Hypoplasia in Growing Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate: Clinical Outcomes and Analysis of Skeletal Changes.经缝牵引成骨术治疗唇腭裂生长发育期患者的面中部发育不全:临床结果及骨骼变化分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jul;136(1):144-155. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001375.
6
Advancement of maxillary anterior segment by distraction osteogenesis for severe maxillary retrusion in cleft lip and palate.腭裂患者上颌严重后缩的牵引成骨前徙术
Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(3):500-5.
7
Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis versus conventional Le Fort III osteotomy in correction of syndromic midfacial hypoplasia: a systematic review.勒福Ⅲ型牵张成骨术与传统勒福Ⅲ型截骨术矫治综合征性面中部发育不全的系统评价
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 May;72(5):959-72. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.09.039. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
8
Midface distraction osteogenesis: internal vs. external devices.面中部牵引成骨术:内固定与外固定装置。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Feb;40(2):139-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.10.009. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
9
Midfacial distraction using a transfacial pinning technique for syndromic craniosynostosis with obstructive respiratory disorders.面中部牵引术联合经面固定技术治疗伴有阻塞性呼吸障碍的综合征性颅缝早闭
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 Dec;63(12):1990-4. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2010.01.029. Epub 2010 Mar 29.
10
Cleft maxillary distraction versus orthognathic surgery--which one is more stable in 5 years?上颌骨腭裂牵张成骨术与正颌外科手术——哪种方法在5年内更稳定?
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Jun;109(6):803-14. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.056. Epub 2010 Mar 17.