Suppr超能文献

癌症比例和其他用于区分恶性和非恶性胸腔积液的新参数。

Cancer ratio and other new parameters for differentiation between malignant and nonmalignant pleural effusions.

出版信息

Pol Arch Intern Med. 2018 Jun 30;128(6):354-361. doi: 10.20452/pamw.4278. Epub 2018 Jun 5.

Abstract

Introduction In contrast to tuberculous pleurisy (TP), no accurate and commonly accepted biochemical marker of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) has been established. Objectives We aimed to evaluate the ability of a previously reported cancer ratio (CR) to discriminate between MPEs and non-MPEs; to test whether age may have additional value in differentiating MPEs from non-MPEs; and if so, to combine lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and age with other TP biomarkers in search of an index useful in the identification of MPEs. Patients and methods A retrospective analysis of data from 140 patients with malignant (n = 74), tuberculous (n = 37), and parapneumonic (n = 29) pleural effusions was performed. The diagnostic performance of a test to discriminate between MPEs and non-MPEs was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results Three ratios showed the largest area under the curve (AUC): serum LDH to pleural fluid soluble Fas ligand, age to pleural fluid adenosine deaminase (ADA), and serum LDH to pleural fluid interleukin 18; moreover, the ratios were characterized by high sensitivity (95%, 93.2%, and 92.9%, respectively) and fair specificity (64.8%, 71.2%, and 58.5%, respectively) for differentiating MPEs from non-MPEs. The AUC for CR was lower and showed a sensitivity of 94.6% and a specificity of 68.2%. Conclusions Our study showed a lower specificity of the CR for discriminating between MPEs and non-MPEs than previously reported. We demonstrated that the combinations of serum LDH with other pleural fluid biomarkers of TP have a similar diagnostic performance. We also found that age might be an important factor differentiating between MPEs and non-MPEs and proposed a new age to pleural fluid ADA ratio which has a discriminative potential similar to that of the CR.

摘要

介绍

与结核性胸膜炎(TP)不同,尚未建立恶性胸腔积液(MPE)的准确且普遍接受的生化标志物。

目的

我们旨在评估先前报道的癌症比率(CR)区分 MPE 和非 MPE 的能力;检验年龄是否在区分 MPE 和非 MPE 方面具有额外价值;如果是,将乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)和年龄与其他 TP 生物标志物结合起来,寻找一种有助于识别 MPE 的指数。

患者和方法

对 140 例恶性(n=74)、结核性(n=37)和类肺炎性(n=29)胸腔积液患者的数据进行回顾性分析。使用受试者工作特征曲线分析评估用于区分 MPE 和非 MPE 的检验的诊断性能。

结果

三个比率的曲线下面积(AUC)最大:血清 LDH 与胸腔液可溶性 Fas 配体、年龄与胸腔液腺苷脱氨酶(ADA)、血清 LDH 与胸腔液白细胞介素 18;此外,这些比率在区分 MPE 和非 MPE 方面具有高灵敏度(95%、93.2%和 92.9%)和中等特异性(64.8%、71.2%和 58.5%)。CR 的 AUC 较低,灵敏度为 94.6%,特异性为 68.2%。

结论

我们的研究表明,CR 区分 MPE 和非 MPE 的特异性低于先前报道。我们证明了血清 LDH 与其他 TP 胸腔液生物标志物的组合具有相似的诊断性能。我们还发现年龄可能是区分 MPE 和非 MPE 的重要因素,并提出了一种新的年龄与胸腔液 ADA 比率,其具有与 CR 相似的鉴别潜力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验