• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为加速美国艾滋病预防提供信息的经济与政策分析方法:该领域的未来方向

Economic and Policy Analytic Approaches to Inform the Acceleration of HIV Prevention in the United States: Future Directions for the Field.

作者信息

Martin Erika G, Rosenberg Eli S, Holtgrave David R

机构信息

Department of Public Administration and Policy, Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy, University at Albany-SUNY, Albany, New York.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University at Albany School of Public Health, SUNY, Rensselaer, New York.

出版信息

AIDS Educ Prev. 2018 Jun;30(3):199-207. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2018.30.3.199.

DOI:10.1521/aeap.2018.30.3.199
PMID:29969310
Abstract

The fields of economic and policy analysis have long played a role in quantifying the burden of the HIV epidemic and informing how to best deploy interventions and policies aimed at maximizing HIV care and reducing transmission. Looking towards the ultimate goal of ending the AIDS epidemic, we describe five areas for further development and application towards HIV policies: (1) setting measurable objectives to create a vision and monitor progress, (2) taking a health and wellness approach to goal-setting, (3) using impact matrices to inform quantitative analysis to explicitly address health disparities, (4) conducting budget impact analyses to project annual program costs and benefits, and (5) advancing the public health systems and services research agenda.

摘要

长期以来,经济分析和政策分析领域在量化艾滋病毒流行的负担以及为如何最佳部署旨在最大限度地扩大艾滋病毒治疗和减少传播的干预措施及政策提供信息方面发挥了作用。展望终结艾滋病流行的最终目标,我们描述了在艾滋病毒政策方面有待进一步发展和应用的五个领域:(1)设定可衡量的目标以确立愿景并监测进展情况;(2)采用健康与福祉方法来设定目标;(3)使用影响矩阵为定量分析提供信息,以明确解决健康差距问题;(4)进行预算影响分析,以预测年度项目成本和效益;(5)推进公共卫生系统和服务研究议程。

相似文献

1
Economic and Policy Analytic Approaches to Inform the Acceleration of HIV Prevention in the United States: Future Directions for the Field.为加速美国艾滋病预防提供信息的经济与政策分析方法:该领域的未来方向
AIDS Educ Prev. 2018 Jun;30(3):199-207. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2018.30.3.199.
2
A benefit-cost analysis of syringe exchange programs.注射器交换项目的成本效益分析。
J Health Soc Policy. 2000;11(4):41-57. doi: 10.1300/j045v11n04_03.
3
Improving health equity and ending the HIV epidemic in the USA: a distributional cost-effectiveness analysis in six cities.改善健康公平,终结美国的艾滋病疫情:六个城市的分配效益成本分析。
Lancet HIV. 2021 Sep;8(9):e581-e590. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(21)00147-8. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
4
Employing resource allocation modeling to inform HIV prevention planning for the state of Iowa.运用资源分配模型为爱荷华州的艾滋病预防规划提供信息。
AIDS Educ Prev. 2013 Oct;25(5):423-9. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2013.25.5.423.
5
A model for allocating CDC's HIV prevention resources in the United States.为美国疾病预防控制中心的艾滋病毒预防资源分配建立模型。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2011 Mar;14(1):115-24. doi: 10.1007/s10729-010-9147-2. Epub 2010 Dec 24.
6
Opportunity costs and uncertainty in the economic evaluation of health care interventions.医疗保健干预措施经济评估中的机会成本与不确定性
Health Econ. 2002 Jan;11(1):23-31. doi: 10.1002/hec.641.
7
Costs, consequences and feasibility of strategies for achieving the goals of the National HIV/AIDS strategy in the United States: a closing window for success?实现美国国家艾滋病毒/艾滋病战略目标的策略的成本、后果和可行性:成功的最后机会之窗?
AIDS Behav. 2012 Aug;16(6):1365-72. doi: 10.1007/s10461-012-0207-0.
8
What about Us? Economic and Policy Changes Affecting Rural HIV/AIDS Services and Care.我们呢?影响农村艾滋病毒/艾滋病服务与护理的经济和政策变化。
Soc Work Public Health. 2017;32(4):273-289. doi: 10.1080/19371918.2017.1282388. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
9
Data-driven decision-making tools to improve public resource allocation for care and prevention of HIV/AIDS.数据驱动的决策工具,以改善用于艾滋病毒/艾滋病护理和预防的公共资源分配。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Mar;33(3):410-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1155.
10
HIV prevention where it is needed most: comparison of strategies for the geographical allocation of interventions.在最需要的地方预防艾滋病毒:干预措施地理分配策略的比较
J Int AIDS Soc. 2017 Dec;20(4). doi: 10.1002/jia2.25020.

引用本文的文献

1
Are Unequal Policies in Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Uptake Needed to Improve Equality? An Examination Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Los Angeles County.是否需要不平等的事前预防措施政策来提高平等性?洛杉矶县男男性行为者的研究。
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2022 Aug;36(8):300-312. doi: 10.1089/apc.2022.0011.