a Faculty of Medicine , University of Basel , Basel , Switzerland.
b Medical University Department , Kantonsspital Aarau , Aarau , Switzerland.
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2018 Jul;16(7):555-564. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2018.1496331. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
Although evidence indicates that use of procalcitonin to guide antibiotic decisions for the treatment of acute respiratory infections (ARI) decreases antibiotic consumption and improves clinical outcomes, algorithms used within studies had differences in PCT cut-off points and frequency of testing. We therefore analyzed studies evaluating procalcitonin-guided antibiotic therapy and propose consensus algorithms for different respiratory infection types. Areas covered: We systematically searched randomized-controlled trials (search strategy updated on February 2018) on procalcitonin-guided antibiotic therapy of ARI in adults using a pre-specified Cochrane protocol and analyzed algorithms from 32 trials that included 10,285 patients treated in primary care settings, emergency departments (ED), and intensive care units (ICU). We derived consensus algorithms for use of procalcitonin by the type of ARI including community-acquired pneumonia, bronchitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma exacerbation, sepsis, and post-operative sepsis due to respiratory infection. Consensus algorithm recommendations differ with regard to timing of treatment (i.e. timing of initiation in low-risk patients or discontinuation in high-risk patients) and procalcitonin cut-off points for the recommendation/strong recommendation to discontinue antibiotics (≤ 0.25/≤ 0.1 µg/L in ED and inpatients, ≤ 0.5/≤ 0.25 µg/L in ICU patients, and reduction by ≥ 80% from peak levels in sepsis patients). Expert commentary: Our proposed algorithms may facilitate safe and efficient implementation of procalcitonin-guided antibiotic protocols in diverse healthcare settings. Still, the decision about initiation and cessation of antibiotic treatment remains a clinical decision based on the patient assessment and the severity of illness and use of procalcitonin should not delay empirical treatment in high risk situations.
虽然有证据表明,使用降钙素原指导急性呼吸道感染(ARI)的抗生素治疗决策可以减少抗生素的使用并改善临床结果,但研究中使用的算法在降钙素原截断值和检测频率方面存在差异。因此,我们分析了评估降钙素原指导抗生素治疗的研究,并为不同类型的呼吸道感染提出了共识算法。涵盖领域:我们系统地搜索了使用预先指定的 Cochrane 方案对成人 ARI 的降钙素原指导抗生素治疗的随机对照试验(搜索策略于 2018 年 2 月更新),并分析了包括在初级保健环境、急诊科(ED)和重症监护病房(ICU)中治疗的 10285 名患者的 32 项试验中的算法。我们为包括社区获得性肺炎、支气管炎、慢性阻塞性肺疾病或哮喘加重、脓毒症和因呼吸道感染导致的术后脓毒症在内的不同 ARI 类型生成了使用降钙素原的共识算法。共识算法建议在治疗时机(即低危患者的开始时机或高危患者的停药时机)和建议/强烈建议停止抗生素的降钙素原截断值(ED 和住院患者≤0.25/≤0.1μg/L,ICU 患者≤0.5/≤0.25μg/L,脓毒症患者从峰值水平降低≥80%)方面有所不同。专家评论:我们提出的算法可以促进降钙素原指导抗生素方案在不同医疗保健环境中的安全和有效实施。然而,抗生素治疗的开始和停止仍然是基于患者评估和疾病严重程度的临床决策,并且在高危情况下使用降钙素原不应延迟经验性治疗。