• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较治疗粪肠球菌感染性心内膜炎时,双联β-内酰胺类抗生素治疗与青霉素-氨基糖苷类抗生素联合治疗的效果。

Comparison of Dual β-Lactam therapy to penicillin-aminoglycoside combination in treatment of Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis.

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, MayoClinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Division of Infectious Diseases, MayoClinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

J Infect. 2018 Nov;77(5):398-404. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2018.06.013. Epub 2018 Jun 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.jinf.2018.06.013
PMID:29969596
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dual β-lactam therapy and a penicillin-aminoglycoside combination are first line regimens in the treatment of penicillin-susceptible Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis (EFIE). Our aim was to compare ampicillin plus ceftriaxone (A+C) to ampicillin plus gentamicin (A+G) in the treatment of EFIE.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of adults (≥18 years) patients diagnosed with EFIE at Mayo Clinic campuses in Rochester, Minnesota, and Phoenix, Arizona and treated with either A+C or A+G. Main outcome measurements were 1 year mortality, nephrotoxicity, and EFIE relapse rates.

RESULTS

Eighty-five cases of EFIE were included in this investigation. The majority (n=67, 79%) of patients received A+G while 18 (21%) patients received A+C as initial treatment. On admission, patients who received A+C had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (median [IQR], 4 [3, 4 vs. 2 [1, 4]; P=.008) and a higher baseline serum creatinine (median [IQR], 1.2 [0.9, 1.6] vs. 0.9 [0.8, 1.2] mg/dL, P=.020). The 1 year mortality rates were similar for both treatment groups, 17% vs. 17%, P=.982. Each group had 1 case of relapsing EFIE. Patients who received A+G had worse kidney function outcome demonstrated by a greater increase in serum creatinine at end of therapy (median [IQR] difference, +0.4 [0.2, 0.8] vs. -0.2 [-0.3, 0.1] mg/dL, P≤.001).

CONCLUSION

A+C appears to be a safe and efficacious regimen in the treatment of EFIE. Patients treated with A+C had lower rates of nephrotoxicity and no differences in relapse rate and 1-year mortality as compared to that of the A+G group.

摘要

背景

在治疗青霉素敏感的粪肠球菌感染性心内膜炎(EFIE)时,双联β-内酰胺类药物治疗和青霉素-氨基糖苷类药物联合治疗是一线治疗方案。我们的目的是比较氨苄西林联合头孢曲松(A+C)与氨苄西林联合庆大霉素(A+G)在 EFIE 治疗中的效果。

方法

这是一项在明尼苏达州罗切斯特市和亚利桑那州凤凰城的梅奥诊所院区诊断为 EFIE 的成年(≥18 岁)患者的回顾性队列研究,这些患者接受 A+C 或 A+G 治疗。主要观察指标为 1 年死亡率、肾毒性和 EFIE 复发率。

结果

本研究共纳入 85 例 EFIE 患者。大多数(n=67,79%)患者接受 A+G 治疗,18 例(21%)患者接受 A+C 作为初始治疗。入院时,接受 A+C 的患者Charlson 合并症指数较高(中位数[IQR],4[3,4 比 2[1,4];P=.008),基线血清肌酐较高(中位数[IQR],1.2[0.9,1.6]比 0.9[0.8,1.2]mg/dL,P=.020)。两组 1 年死亡率相似,分别为 17%和 17%,P=.982。每组各有 1 例 EFIE 复发。接受 A+G 治疗的患者在治疗结束时的肾功能结果更差,表现为血清肌酐升高幅度更大(中位数[IQR]差值,+0.4[0.2,0.8]比-0.2[-0.3,0.1]mg/dL,P≤.001)。

结论

A+C 似乎是治疗 EFIE 的一种安全有效的方案。与 A+G 组相比,接受 A+C 治疗的患者肾毒性发生率较低,复发率和 1 年死亡率无差异。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Dual β-Lactam therapy to penicillin-aminoglycoside combination in treatment of Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis.比较治疗粪肠球菌感染性心内膜炎时,双联β-内酰胺类抗生素治疗与青霉素-氨基糖苷类抗生素联合治疗的效果。
J Infect. 2018 Nov;77(5):398-404. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2018.06.013. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
2
Changes in the treatment of Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis in Spain in the last 15 years: from ampicillin plus gentamicin to ampicillin plus ceftriaxone.过去 15 年西班牙粪肠球菌感染性心内膜炎治疗的变化:从氨苄西林联合庆大霉素到氨苄西林联合头孢曲松。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014 Dec;20(12):O1075-83. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12756. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
3
Evaluation of penicillin-gentamicin and dual beta-lactam therapies in Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis.评估青霉素-庆大霉素和双联β-内酰胺类抗生素治疗粪肠球菌感染性心内膜炎的疗效。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2022 Mar;59(3):106522. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2022.106522. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
4
Ampicillin plus ceftriaxone is as effective as ampicillin plus gentamicin for treating enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis.氨苄西林联合头孢曲松治疗粪肠球菌感染性心内膜炎的疗效与氨苄西林联合庆大霉素相当。
Clin Infect Dis. 2013 May;56(9):1261-8. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit052. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
5
Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy in Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis.粪肠球菌感染性心内膜炎的门诊胃肠外抗菌治疗
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2018 Apr;43(2):220-223. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12635. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
6
Four weeks versus six weeks of ampicillin plus ceftriaxone in Enterococcus faecalis native valve endocarditis: A prospective cohort study.四周与六周氨苄西林联合头孢曲松治疗粪肠球菌性自体瓣膜心内膜炎的前瞻性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 3;15(8):e0237011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237011. eCollection 2020.
7
Impact of Enterococcus faecalis Endocarditis Treatment on Risk of Relapse.粪肠球菌性心内膜炎治疗对复发风险的影响。
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Jan 13;76(2):281-290. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac777.
8
Success of ampicillin plus ceftriaxone rescue therapy for a relapse of Enterococcus faecalis native-valve endocarditis and in vitro data on double beta-lactam activity.氨苄西林联合头孢曲松挽救治疗粪肠球菌自体瓣膜心内膜炎复发的成功案例及双β-内酰胺活性的体外数据
Scand J Infect Dis. 2008;40(11-12):968-72. doi: 10.1080/00365540802398945.
9
Efficacy of ampicillin combined with ceftriaxone and gentamicin in the treatment of experimental endocarditis due to Enterococcus faecalis with no high-level resistance to aminoglycosides.氨苄西林联合头孢曲松和庆大霉素治疗对氨基糖苷类无高水平耐药的粪肠球菌所致实验性心内膜炎的疗效
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003 Sep;52(3):514-7. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg360. Epub 2003 Aug 13.
10
[Infective endocarditis due to high level aminoglycoside resistant Enterococcus faecalis and methicillin resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci presenting with rheumatic manifestations].[由高水平氨基糖苷类耐药粪肠球菌和耐甲氧西林凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌引起的感染性心内膜炎伴风湿表现]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2008 Jul;42(3):509-14.

引用本文的文献

1
Combination therapy versus monotherapy: retrospective analysis of antibiotic treatment of enterococcal endocarditis.联合治疗与单一疗法:肠球菌性心内膜炎抗生素治疗的回顾性分析
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Jan 20;25(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10451-2.
2
Infective endocarditis with metastatic infections in a renal transplant recipient: a case report.肾移植受者感染性心内膜炎合并转移性感染:病例报告。
J Med Case Rep. 2024 Sep 26;18(1):448. doi: 10.1186/s13256-024-04764-0.
3
Adverse Events Comparison of Double Beta-Lactam Combinations for Bloodstream Infections: Ampicillin plus Ceftriaxone and Ampicillin/Cloxacillin.
用于血流感染的双β-内酰胺联合用药的不良事件比较:氨苄西林加头孢曲松与氨苄西林/氯唑西林
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Jul 25;13(8):696. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13080696.
4
Is It Useful to Repeat Blood Cultures in Endocarditis Patients? A Critical Appraisal.在心内膜炎患者中重复进行血培养是否有用?一项批判性评估。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jul 22;14(14):1578. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14141578.
5
Enterococcal endocarditis management and relapses.肠球菌性心内膜炎的管理与复发
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2024 Mar 6;6(2):dlae033. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae033. eCollection 2024 Apr.
6
Differential in vitro susceptibility to ampicillin/ceftriaxone combination therapy among Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis clinical isolates.屎肠球菌感染性心内膜炎临床分离株对氨苄西林/头孢曲松联合治疗的体外药敏差异。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2024 Apr 2;79(4):801-809. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkae032.
7
Aminoglycosides-alive and well in treatment of pediatric infections: A case of benefit versus risk.氨基糖苷类药物在儿科感染治疗中仍在广泛应用:益处与风险的实例分析
J Assoc Med Microbiol Infect Dis Can. 2019 Mar 11;4(1):1-5. doi: 10.3138/jammi.2018.09.19. eCollection 2019 Mar.
8
A retrospective study of infective endocarditis: comparison of clinical characteristics and outcomes associated with treatment.感染性心内膜炎的回顾性研究:与治疗相关的临床特征及结局比较
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2022 Sep 30;4(5):dlac096. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlac096. eCollection 2022 Oct.
9
Impact of Enterococcus faecalis Endocarditis Treatment on Risk of Relapse.粪肠球菌性心内膜炎治疗对复发风险的影响。
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Jan 13;76(2):281-290. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac777.
10
Antimicrobial therapy in resource-limited settings with high antimicrobial resistance: a case-based approach.资源有限且抗菌药物耐药性高的环境中的抗菌治疗:基于病例的方法。
Infez Med. 2022 Mar 1;30(1):73-79. doi: 10.53854/liim-3001-8. eCollection 2022.