Ishikawa Kazuhiro, Kobayashi Daiki, Mori Nobuyoshi
Department of Infectious Diseases, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo 104-8560, Japan.
Department of Primary Care and General Medicine, Tokyo Medical University Ibaraki Medical Center, Ibaraki 300-0332, Japan.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Jul 25;13(8):696. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13080696.
In Japan, only ampicillin/cloxacillin (ABPC/MCIPC) is available as an anti-staphylococcal penicillin-based treatment for bacteremia. However, the incidence of adverse events associated with double beta-lactam administration remains unknown. Therefore, we investigated the adverse events of double beta-lactam administration in patients with bacteremia. Adult patients (≥18 years) with bacteremia treated with ABPC, ABPC + ceftriaxone (CTRX), or ABPC/MCIPC were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome of this study was the incidence of adverse events such as acute kidney injury, liver dysfunction, and myelosuppression. Chi-square tests and -tests were used for bivariate analysis. Propensity score (PS) matching was conducted to adjust for confounding factors. We included 277 ABPC-, 57 ABPC + CTRX-, and 43 ABPC/MCIPC-treated patients. Significant differences were noted in age, number of male patients, proportion of patients with qSOFA score ≥2, incidence of chronic kidney disease, treatment duration, mechanical ventilation use, vasopressor use, and proportion of patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) KDIGO grade ≥2. Further, a significant difference was observed between ABPC and ABPC/MCIPC, with a hazard ratio of 1.83 in AKI. In the PS-matched cohort, AKI incidence associated with ABPC/MCIPC was significantly higher than that associated with ABPC. ABPC + CTRX may be safe, whereas ABPC/MCIPC presents a higher risk of AKI and may not be suitable.
在日本,只有氨苄西林/氯唑西林(ABPC/MCIPC)可作为基于抗葡萄球菌青霉素的菌血症治疗药物。然而,与联合使用β-内酰胺类药物相关的不良事件发生率仍不清楚。因此,我们调查了菌血症患者联合使用β-内酰胺类药物的不良事件。对接受ABPC、ABPC + 头孢曲松(CTRX)或ABPC/MCIPC治疗的成年菌血症患者(≥18岁)进行回顾性分析。本研究的主要结局是急性肾损伤、肝功能障碍和骨髓抑制等不良事件的发生率。采用卡方检验和t检验进行双变量分析。进行倾向评分(PS)匹配以调整混杂因素。我们纳入了277例接受ABPC治疗、57例接受ABPC + CTRX治疗和43例接受ABPC/MCIPC治疗的患者。在年龄、男性患者数量、qSOFA评分≥2的患者比例、慢性肾脏病发病率、治疗持续时间、机械通气使用情况、血管升压药使用情况以及急性肾损伤(AKI)KDIGO分级≥2的患者比例方面存在显著差异。此外,观察到ABPC与ABPC/MCIPC之间存在显著差异,AKI的风险比为1.83。在PS匹配队列中,与ABPC/MCIPC相关的AKI发生率显著高于与ABPC相关的发生率。ABPC + CTRX可能是安全的,而ABPC/MCIPC存在较高的AKI风险,可能不合适。