Suppr超能文献

用于血流感染的双β-内酰胺联合用药的不良事件比较:氨苄西林加头孢曲松与氨苄西林/氯唑西林

Adverse Events Comparison of Double Beta-Lactam Combinations for Bloodstream Infections: Ampicillin plus Ceftriaxone and Ampicillin/Cloxacillin.

作者信息

Ishikawa Kazuhiro, Kobayashi Daiki, Mori Nobuyoshi

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo 104-8560, Japan.

Department of Primary Care and General Medicine, Tokyo Medical University Ibaraki Medical Center, Ibaraki 300-0332, Japan.

出版信息

Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Jul 25;13(8):696. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13080696.

Abstract

In Japan, only ampicillin/cloxacillin (ABPC/MCIPC) is available as an anti-staphylococcal penicillin-based treatment for bacteremia. However, the incidence of adverse events associated with double beta-lactam administration remains unknown. Therefore, we investigated the adverse events of double beta-lactam administration in patients with bacteremia. Adult patients (≥18 years) with bacteremia treated with ABPC, ABPC + ceftriaxone (CTRX), or ABPC/MCIPC were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome of this study was the incidence of adverse events such as acute kidney injury, liver dysfunction, and myelosuppression. Chi-square tests and -tests were used for bivariate analysis. Propensity score (PS) matching was conducted to adjust for confounding factors. We included 277 ABPC-, 57 ABPC + CTRX-, and 43 ABPC/MCIPC-treated patients. Significant differences were noted in age, number of male patients, proportion of patients with qSOFA score ≥2, incidence of chronic kidney disease, treatment duration, mechanical ventilation use, vasopressor use, and proportion of patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) KDIGO grade ≥2. Further, a significant difference was observed between ABPC and ABPC/MCIPC, with a hazard ratio of 1.83 in AKI. In the PS-matched cohort, AKI incidence associated with ABPC/MCIPC was significantly higher than that associated with ABPC. ABPC + CTRX may be safe, whereas ABPC/MCIPC presents a higher risk of AKI and may not be suitable.

摘要

在日本,只有氨苄西林/氯唑西林(ABPC/MCIPC)可作为基于抗葡萄球菌青霉素的菌血症治疗药物。然而,与联合使用β-内酰胺类药物相关的不良事件发生率仍不清楚。因此,我们调查了菌血症患者联合使用β-内酰胺类药物的不良事件。对接受ABPC、ABPC + 头孢曲松(CTRX)或ABPC/MCIPC治疗的成年菌血症患者(≥18岁)进行回顾性分析。本研究的主要结局是急性肾损伤、肝功能障碍和骨髓抑制等不良事件的发生率。采用卡方检验和t检验进行双变量分析。进行倾向评分(PS)匹配以调整混杂因素。我们纳入了277例接受ABPC治疗、57例接受ABPC + CTRX治疗和43例接受ABPC/MCIPC治疗的患者。在年龄、男性患者数量、qSOFA评分≥2的患者比例、慢性肾脏病发病率、治疗持续时间、机械通气使用情况、血管升压药使用情况以及急性肾损伤(AKI)KDIGO分级≥2的患者比例方面存在显著差异。此外,观察到ABPC与ABPC/MCIPC之间存在显著差异,AKI的风险比为1.83。在PS匹配队列中,与ABPC/MCIPC相关的AKI发生率显著高于与ABPC相关的发生率。ABPC + CTRX可能是安全的,而ABPC/MCIPC存在较高的AKI风险,可能不合适。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca9f/11350733/43890a891c34/antibiotics-13-00696-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验