• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Two Underserved U.S. Populations: A Parallel Analysis.美国两个服务不足人群的结直肠癌筛查预测因素:一项平行分析
Front Oncol. 2018 Jun 19;8:230. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00230. eCollection 2018.
2
Examining multilevel neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics associated with colorectal cancer screening in Vietnamese Americans residing in Philadelphia County.探讨与居住在费城的越南裔美国人的结直肠癌筛查相关的多层次邻里社会经济特征。
Transl Behav Med. 2022 Mar 17;12(3):489-497. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibab136.
3
Geographic and population-level disparities in colorectal cancer testing: A multilevel analysis of Medicaid and commercial claims data.地理和人口水平的结直肠癌检测差异:医疗补助和商业索赔数据的多层次分析。
Prev Med. 2017 Aug;101:44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 May 13.
4
Effect of Neighborhood and Individual-Level Socioeconomic Factors on Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence.社区和个体社会经济因素对结直肠癌筛查依从性的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 21;18(9):4398. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094398.
5
Association of Race and Socioeconomic Status With Colorectal Cancer Screening, Colorectal Cancer Risk, and Mortality in Southern US Adults.种族和社会经济地位与美国南部成年人结直肠癌筛查、结直肠癌风险和死亡率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1917995. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17995.
6
Geographic variation in colorectal cancer survival and the role of small-area socioeconomic deprivation: a multilevel survival analysis of the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study Cohort.结直肠癌生存的地域差异及小区域社会经济剥夺的作用:NIH-AARP 饮食与健康研究队列的多层次生存分析。
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Oct 1;174(7):828-38. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr162. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
7
Individual- and provider-level factors associated with colorectal cancer screening in accordance with guideline recommendation: a community-level perspective across varying levels of risk.按照指南建议,与结直肠癌筛查相关的个体和提供者水平因素:不同风险水平的社区层面视角。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Mar 20;13:248. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-248.
8
Utilization of Census Tract-Based Neighborhood Poverty Rates to Predict Non-adherence to Screening Colonoscopy.利用基于普查地段的邻里贫困率来预测筛查结肠镜检查的不依从性。
Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Sep;64(9):2505-2513. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05585-8. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
9
Neighborhood disadvantage and racial disparities in colorectal cancer incidence: a population-based study in Louisiana.社区劣势与结直肠癌发病的种族差异:路易斯安那州的一项基于人群的研究。
Ann Epidemiol. 2018 May;28(5):316-321.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
10
Association Between Depression and Anxiety Status With Uptake of Colorectal Cancer Screening Among US Adults: A Population-Level Study.美国成年人抑郁症和焦虑症状态与结直肠癌筛查接受情况之间的关联:一项人群水平研究
Cureus. 2023 Jul 29;15(7):e42659. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42659. eCollection 2023 Jul.

引用本文的文献

1
Area-level socioeconomic status is associated with colorectal cancer screening, incidence and mortality in the US: a systematic review and meta-analysis.美国地区层面的社会经济地位与结直肠癌筛查、发病率及死亡率相关:一项系统综述与荟萃分析
Soc Sci Med. 2025 Sep;381:118212. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118212. Epub 2025 May 16.
2
Lower Neighborhood-Level Socioeconomic Status Is Associated with Lower Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake in the Southern Community Cohort Study.在南方社区队列研究中,邻里层面较低的社会经济地位与较低的结直肠癌筛查率相关。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2025 Jun 2;18(6):355-363. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0541.
3
Factors Affecting the Rate of Colonoscopy Among African Americans Aged Over 45 Years.影响45岁以上非裔美国人结肠镜检查率的因素
Cureus. 2023 Oct 5;15(10):e46525. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46525. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
Racial Differences in Strength of Associations Between Colorectal Cancer Screening, Area Deprivation, Demographics, and Clinical Characteristics.结直肠癌筛查、地区贫困程度、人口统计学特征及临床特征之间关联强度的种族差异。
Ochsner J. 2023 Fall;23(3):194-205. doi: 10.31486/toj.23.0012.
5
Hyperlocal disparities in breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening: An ecological study of social vulnerability in Miami-Dade county.乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查中的超局部差异:迈阿密-戴德县社会脆弱性的生态研究。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Aug 15;35:102371. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102371. eCollection 2023 Oct.
6
Can virtual human clinicians help close the gap in colorectal cancer screening for rural adults in the United States? The influence of rural identity on perceptions of virtual human clinicians.虚拟人类临床医生能否帮助缩小美国农村成年人在结直肠癌筛查方面的差距?农村身份对虚拟人类临床医生认知的影响。
Prev Med Rep. 2022 Oct 28;30:102034. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.102034. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
County-Level Social Vulnerability and Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the US, 2018.美国 2018 年县级社会脆弱性与乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查率
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2233429. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33429.
8
Preventative Cancer Screening Rates Among Uninsured Patients in Free Clinics: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Cancer Survivors and Non-cancer Survivors.免费诊所中未参保患者的癌症预防筛查率:癌症幸存者和非癌症幸存者的回顾性队列研究。
Cancer Control. 2022 Jan-Dec;29:10732748211072983. doi: 10.1177/10732748211072983.
9
Colorectal cancer and potential predictors of never screened for faecal occult blood test: a narrative review.结直肠癌与从未接受粪便潜血试验筛查的潜在预测因素:一项叙述性综述。
J Public Health Res. 2021 Aug 4;11(1):2377. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2021.2377.
10
Determinants Associated With Longitudinal Adherence to Annual Lung Cancer Screening: A Retrospective Analysis of Claims Data.与年度肺癌筛查纵向依从性相关的决定因素:索赔数据分析的回顾性分析。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2021 Aug;18(8):1084-1094. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.03.003. Epub 2021 Mar 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2564-2575. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5989.
2
A Media and Clinic Intervention to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Ohio Appalachia.一项旨在提高俄亥俄州阿巴拉契亚地区结直肠癌筛查率的媒体与临床干预措施。
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:943152. doi: 10.1155/2015/943152. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
3
Where can colorectal cancer screening interventions have the most impact?结直肠癌筛查干预措施在哪些方面能产生最大影响?
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Aug;24(8):1151-6. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0082. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
4
Socioeconomic status, race, and mortality: a prospective cohort study.社会经济地位、种族与死亡率:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Dec;104(12):e98-e107. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302156. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
5
Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014.结直肠癌统计数据,2014 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2014 Mar-Apr;64(2):104-17. doi: 10.3322/caac.21220. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
6
Correlates of colorectal cancer screening among residents of Ohio Appalachia.俄亥俄阿巴拉契亚地区居民的结直肠癌筛查相关因素。
J Community Health. 2013 Aug;38(4):609-18. doi: 10.1007/s10900-013-9683-z.
7
Introduction: Understanding and influencing multilevel factors across the cancer care continuum.引言:理解并影响癌症护理连续过程中的多层次因素。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2012 May;2012(44):2-10. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgs008.
8
The Southern Community Cohort Study: investigating health disparities.南方社区队列研究:调查健康差异。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2010 Feb;21(1 Suppl):26-37. doi: 10.1353/hpu.0.0245.
9
Association of area socioeconomic status and breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review.地区社会经济地位与乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查的关联:系统评价。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Oct;18(10):2579-99. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0135.
10
The health of the Delta Region: a story of increasing disparities.三角洲地区的健康状况:差距日益扩大的故事。
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2008 Summer;31(1):58-71.

美国两个服务不足人群的结直肠癌筛查预测因素:一项平行分析

Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Two Underserved U.S. Populations: A Parallel Analysis.

作者信息

Bernardo Brittany M, Gross Amy L, Young Gregory, Baltic Ryan, Reisinger Sarah, Blot William J, Paskett Electra Diane

机构信息

Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.

Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, International Epidemiology Field Station, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2018 Jun 19;8:230. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00230. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2018.00230
PMID:29971216
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6018201/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite declining colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality rates in the U.S., significant geographic and racial disparities in CRC death rates remain. Differences in guideline-concordant CRC screening rates may explain some of these disparities. We aim to assess individual and neighborhood-level predictors of guideline-concordant CRC screening within two cohorts of individuals located within CRC mortality geographic hotspot regions in the U.S.

METHODS

A total of 36,901 participants from the Southern Community Cohort Study and 4,491 participants from the Ohio Appalachia CRC screening study were included in this study. Self-reported date of last CRC screening was used to determine if the participant was within guidelines for screening. Logistic regression models were utilized to determine the association of individual-level predictors, neighborhood deprivation, and residence in hotspot regions on the odds of being within guidelines for CRC screening.

RESULTS

Lower household income, lack of health insurance, and being a smoker were each associated with lower odds of being within guidelines for CRC screening in both cohorts. Area-level associations were less evident, although up to 15% lower guideline adherence was associated with residence in neighborhoods of greater deprivation and in the Lower Mississippi Delta, one of the identified CRC mortality hotspots.

CONCLUSION

These results reveal the adverse effects of lower area-level and individual socioeconomic status on adherence to CRC guideline screening.

摘要

背景

尽管美国结直肠癌(CRC)的发病率和死亡率在下降,但CRC死亡率仍存在显著的地理和种族差异。符合指南的CRC筛查率差异可能是造成这些差异的部分原因。我们旨在评估美国CRC死亡率地理热点地区两个队列中符合指南的CRC筛查的个体和社区层面预测因素。

方法

本研究纳入了南方社区队列研究的36,901名参与者和俄亥俄阿巴拉契亚CRC筛查研究的4,491名参与者。使用自我报告的上次CRC筛查日期来确定参与者是否符合筛查指南。采用逻辑回归模型来确定个体层面预测因素、社区贫困程度以及居住在热点地区与符合CRC筛查指南几率之间的关联。

结果

在两个队列中,家庭收入较低、缺乏医疗保险和吸烟均与符合CRC筛查指南的几率较低相关。区域层面的关联不太明显,尽管居住在贫困程度较高的社区以及已确定的CRC死亡率热点之一的密西西比河下游三角洲地区,符合指南的依从性降低了15%。

结论

这些结果揭示了较低的区域层面和个体社会经济地位对CRC指南筛查依从性的不利影响。