Bernardo Brittany M, Gross Amy L, Young Gregory, Baltic Ryan, Reisinger Sarah, Blot William J, Paskett Electra Diane
Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, International Epidemiology Field Station, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Front Oncol. 2018 Jun 19;8:230. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00230. eCollection 2018.
Despite declining colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality rates in the U.S., significant geographic and racial disparities in CRC death rates remain. Differences in guideline-concordant CRC screening rates may explain some of these disparities. We aim to assess individual and neighborhood-level predictors of guideline-concordant CRC screening within two cohorts of individuals located within CRC mortality geographic hotspot regions in the U.S.
A total of 36,901 participants from the Southern Community Cohort Study and 4,491 participants from the Ohio Appalachia CRC screening study were included in this study. Self-reported date of last CRC screening was used to determine if the participant was within guidelines for screening. Logistic regression models were utilized to determine the association of individual-level predictors, neighborhood deprivation, and residence in hotspot regions on the odds of being within guidelines for CRC screening.
Lower household income, lack of health insurance, and being a smoker were each associated with lower odds of being within guidelines for CRC screening in both cohorts. Area-level associations were less evident, although up to 15% lower guideline adherence was associated with residence in neighborhoods of greater deprivation and in the Lower Mississippi Delta, one of the identified CRC mortality hotspots.
These results reveal the adverse effects of lower area-level and individual socioeconomic status on adherence to CRC guideline screening.
尽管美国结直肠癌(CRC)的发病率和死亡率在下降,但CRC死亡率仍存在显著的地理和种族差异。符合指南的CRC筛查率差异可能是造成这些差异的部分原因。我们旨在评估美国CRC死亡率地理热点地区两个队列中符合指南的CRC筛查的个体和社区层面预测因素。
本研究纳入了南方社区队列研究的36,901名参与者和俄亥俄阿巴拉契亚CRC筛查研究的4,491名参与者。使用自我报告的上次CRC筛查日期来确定参与者是否符合筛查指南。采用逻辑回归模型来确定个体层面预测因素、社区贫困程度以及居住在热点地区与符合CRC筛查指南几率之间的关联。
在两个队列中,家庭收入较低、缺乏医疗保险和吸烟均与符合CRC筛查指南的几率较低相关。区域层面的关联不太明显,尽管居住在贫困程度较高的社区以及已确定的CRC死亡率热点之一的密西西比河下游三角洲地区,符合指南的依从性降低了15%。
这些结果揭示了较低的区域层面和个体社会经济地位对CRC指南筛查依从性的不利影响。