Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
J Periodontal Res. 2018 Jun;53(3):440-445. doi: 10.1111/jre.12532. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
Glycine powder air-polishing (GPAP) is an alternative approach to removing subgingival plaque biofilms for effective periodontal therapy. This study aimed to investigate the effect of subgingival GPAP as an additional approach to nonsurgical periodontal treatment in subjects with chronic periodontitis.
Twenty-seven nonsmoking subjects were recruited. Two quadrants in each subject were randomly assigned, according to a split-mouth design, to receive scaling and root planing (SRP) and GPAP (Test group) or SRP and air flushing with water (Control group) at sites with probing depth ≥5 mm. Clinical parameters, gingival crevicular fluid volumes and the concentrations of interleukin-1β and interleukin-1ra in gingival crevicular fluid were measured at baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months after the treatments.
At baseline, no statistically significant difference in periodontal and gingival crevicular fluid parameters was found between the Test and Control groups. Overall, the periodontal conditions of all subjects showed significant improvement after the treatments. Notably, the Test group showed greater reduction in gingival crevicular fluid volume (0.37 ± 0.26 μL) than the Control group (0.23 ± 0.30 μL) at 3 months (P < .05). The gingival crevicular fluid levels of interleukin-1β and interleukin-1ra showed a significant decrease in both groups at 6 months, and no significant difference was found between the groups.
These preliminary results suggest that GPAP, as an additional approach to nonsurgical periodontal treatment, may be beneficial for the short-term improvement of subclinical inflammation when measured by gingival crevicular fluid volume. Further longitudinal studies with larger sample sizes are required to clarify the exact benefits of GPAP treatment for controlling inflammation and maintaining long-term periodontal health.
甘氨酸粉末空气抛光(GPAP)是一种替代方法,可以去除龈下菌斑生物膜,从而实现有效的牙周治疗。本研究旨在探讨将 GPAP 作为一种辅助手段应用于慢性牙周炎患者的非手术牙周治疗中的效果。
共招募了 27 名不吸烟的受试者。根据分口设计,将每位受试者的每侧上下颌各两个象限随机分配,接受龈下刮治和根面平整术(SRP)联合 GPAP(试验组)或 SRP 联合水冲洗(对照组)治疗,治疗部位的探诊深度≥5mm。在治疗前、治疗后 1、3 和 6 个月时,测量临床参数、龈沟液量以及龈沟液中白细胞介素-1β和白细胞介素-1受体拮抗剂的浓度。
治疗前,试验组和对照组的牙周和龈沟液参数无统计学差异。总体而言,所有受试者的牙周状况在治疗后均有显著改善。值得注意的是,试验组在治疗后 3 个月时龈沟液量的减少量(0.37±0.26μL)显著大于对照组(0.23±0.30μL)(P<.05)。两组在治疗后 6 个月时白细胞介素-1β和白细胞介素-1受体拮抗剂的龈沟液水平均显著降低,且两组间无统计学差异。
这些初步结果表明,GPAP 作为非手术牙周治疗的辅助手段,在通过龈沟液量衡量时,可能有益于短期改善亚临床炎症。需要进一步开展更大样本量的纵向研究,以明确 GPAP 治疗在控制炎症和维持长期牙周健康方面的确切益处。