Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜右后叶切除术与腹腔镜右半肝切除术治疗肝后段肝细胞癌:倾向评分匹配分析

Laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy versus laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in posterior segments: Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

作者信息

Rhu J, Choi G S, Kim J M, Kwon C H D, Kim S J, Joh J-W

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Scand J Surg. 2019 Mar;108(1):23-29. doi: 10.1177/1457496918783720. Epub 2018 Jul 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

: This study was designed to analyze the feasibility of laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy compared to laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma located in the posterior segments.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

: The study included patients who underwent either laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy or laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma located in segment 6 or 7 from January 2009 to December 2016 at Samsung Medical Center. After 1:1 propensity score matching, patient baseline characteristics and operative and postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups. Disease-free survival and overall survival were compared using Kaplan-Meier log-rank test.

RESULTS

: Among 61 patients with laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy and 37 patients with laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy, 30 patients from each group were analyzed after propensity score matching. After matching, baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar including tumor size (3.4 ± 1.2 cm in laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy vs 3.7 ± 2.1 cm in laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy, P = 0.483); differences were significant before matching (3.1 ± 1.3 cm in laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy vs 4.3 ± 2.7 cm in laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy, P = 0.035). No significant differences were observed in operative and postoperative data except for free margin size (1.04 ± 0.71 cm in laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy vs 2.95 ± 1.75 cm in laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy, P < 0.001). Disease-free survival (5-year survival: 38.0% in laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy vs 47.0% in laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy, P = 0.510) and overall survival (5-year survival: 92.7% in laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy vs 89.6% in laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy, P = 0.593) did not differ between the groups based on Kaplan-Meier log-rank test.

CONCLUSION

: For hepatocellular carcinoma in the posterior segments, laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy was feasible compared to laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy when performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究旨在分析与腹腔镜右半肝切除术相比,腹腔镜右后叶切除术治疗位于肝后段的肝细胞癌患者的可行性。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了2009年1月至2016年12月在三星医疗中心接受腹腔镜右后叶切除术或腹腔镜右半肝切除术治疗位于肝6段或7段的肝细胞癌患者。在进行1:1倾向评分匹配后,比较两组患者的基线特征、手术及术后结果。采用Kaplan-Meier对数秩检验比较无病生存期和总生存期。

结果

在61例行腹腔镜右后叶切除术的患者和37例行腹腔镜右半肝切除术的患者中,倾向评分匹配后每组各分析30例患者。匹配后,两组的基线特征相似,包括肿瘤大小(腹腔镜右后叶切除术组为3.4±1.2cm,腹腔镜右半肝切除术组为3.7±2.1cm,P = 0.483);匹配前差异有统计学意义(腹腔镜右后叶切除术组为3.1±1.3cm,腹腔镜右半肝切除术组为4.3±2.7cm,P = 0.035)。除切缘宽度外,手术及术后数据无显著差异(腹腔镜右后叶切除术组为1.04±0.71cm,腹腔镜右半肝切除术组为2.95±1.75cm,P < 0.001)。根据Kaplan-Meier对数秩检验,两组的无病生存期(5年生存率:腹腔镜右后叶切除术组为38.0%,腹腔镜右半肝切除术组为47.0%,P = 0.510)和总生存期(5年生存率:腹腔镜右后叶切除术组为92.7%,腹腔镜右半肝切除术组为89.6%,P = 0.593)无差异。

结论

对于肝后段的肝细胞癌,由经验丰富的腹腔镜外科医生进行手术时,与腹腔镜右半肝切除术相比,腹腔镜右后叶切除术是可行的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验