• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年胆总管结石患者腹腔镜胆总管探查术中胆囊管汇合部微切开术

Micro-Incision of the Cystic Duct Confluence in Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for Elderly Patients with Choledocholithiasis.

作者信息

Niu Xiaojuan, Song Jinghai, He Xiuwen, Chen Jian, Xu Jingyong, Li Zhe, Long Haikong, Wei Junmin

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, China, No.1, Dahua Road, Dong Dan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730 China.

出版信息

Indian J Surg. 2018 Jun;80(3):227-232. doi: 10.1007/s12262-016-1574-y. Epub 2016 Dec 23.

DOI:10.1007/s12262-016-1574-y
PMID:29973752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6014948/
Abstract

Common bile duct (CBD) stones are common in elderly patients. The laparoscopic transcystic approach with micro-incision of the cystic duct confluence in common bile duct exploration (LTM-CBDE) is a modified laparoscopic transcystic approach. Its safety and efficacy have not been studied in elderly patients with secondary choledocholithiasis. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of LTM-CBDE in elderly (≥65 years) patients with secondary choledocholithiasis and compares the results with those in younger patients. In this retrospective analysis, 128 patients underwent LTM-CBDE from March 2007 to December 2013. The patients were divided into two groups according to age: the elderly group consisted of 50 patients aged ≥65 years and the younger group consisted of 78 patients aged <65 years. The preoperative morbidity rate, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, previous abdominal operations, operation time, postoperative hospital stay, open conversion rate, postoperative complication rate, residual stone rate, recurrence rate and mortality were compared in both groups. The preoperative morbidity (41 vs. 28) and ASA score (2.5 ± 0.7 vs. 1.8 ± 0.6) were higher in the elderly group ( = 0.000, in both groups). No significant differences in previous abdominal operations, operation time, postoperative hospital stay, open conversion rate, postoperative complication rate, residual stone rate, recurrence rate and mortality ( > 0.05) were found between the two groups from March 2007 to December 2013. LTM-CBDE is a safe and effective treatment procedure for elderly patients with secondary choledocholithiasis. For suitable patients, we recommend LTM-CBDE as the treatment of choice.

摘要

胆总管结石在老年患者中很常见。在胆总管探查术中采用腹腔镜经胆囊管汇合部微切口经胆囊管途径(LTM-CBDE)是一种改良的腹腔镜经胆囊管途径。其安全性和有效性尚未在老年继发性胆总管结石患者中进行研究。本研究评估LTM-CBDE在老年(≥65岁)继发性胆总管结石患者中的安全性和有效性,并将结果与年轻患者进行比较。在这项回顾性分析中,2007年3月至2013年12月期间,128例患者接受了LTM-CBDE。根据年龄将患者分为两组:老年组由50例年龄≥65岁的患者组成,年轻组由78例年龄<65岁的患者组成。比较两组患者的术前发病率、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分、既往腹部手术史、手术时间、术后住院时间、中转开腹率、术后并发症发生率、残余结石率、复发率和死亡率。老年组的术前发病率(41比28)和ASA评分(2.5±0.7比1.8±0.6)更高(两组均P = 0.000)。2007年3月至2013年12月期间,两组在既往腹部手术史、手术时间、术后住院时间、中转开腹率、术后并发症发生率、残余结石率、复发率和死亡率方面均未发现显著差异(P>0.05)。LTM-CBDE是老年继发性胆总管结石患者安全有效的治疗方法。对于合适的患者,我们推荐LTM-CBDE作为首选治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Micro-Incision of the Cystic Duct Confluence in Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for Elderly Patients with Choledocholithiasis.老年胆总管结石患者腹腔镜胆总管探查术中胆囊管汇合部微切开术
Indian J Surg. 2018 Jun;80(3):227-232. doi: 10.1007/s12262-016-1574-y. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
2
Dilation of the cystic duct confluence in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and stone extraction in patients with secondary choledocholithiasis.继发性胆总管结石患者腹腔镜胆总管探查取石术中胆囊管汇合部扩张情况
BMC Surg. 2020 Mar 17;20(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00705-y.
3
Transcystic approach with micro-incision of the cystic duct and its confluence part in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.腹腔镜胆总管探查术中经胆囊途径行胆囊管及其汇合部微切口手术
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 Dec;23(12):977-81. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0309. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
4
Laparoscopic Transcystic Common Bile Duct Exploration in the Elderly is as Effective and Safe as in Younger Patients.老年人腹腔镜经胆囊胆总管探查术与年轻患者一样有效且安全。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Jan;27(1):48-52. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0116. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
5
Innovative technique of needlescopic grasper-assisted single-incision laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: A comparative study.针状内镜抓持器辅助单孔腹腔镜胆总管探查创新技术:一项对比研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Dec 7;21(45):12857-64. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i45.12857.
6
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a safe and definitive treatment for elderly patients.腹腔镜胆总管探查术:老年患者的一种安全且有效的治疗方法。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jun;31(6):2541-2547. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5257-3. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
7
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for elderly patients: as a first treatment strategy for common bile duct stones.老年患者的腹腔镜胆总管探查术:作为胆总管结石的首选治疗策略
J Korean Surg Soc. 2011 Aug;81(2):128-33. doi: 10.4174/jkss.2011.81.2.128. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
8
The Clinical Evaluation of Laparoscopic Transcystic Duct Common Bile Duct Exploration in Elderly Choledocholithiasis.腹腔镜经胆囊管胆总管探查术在老年胆总管结石中的临床评估
Hepatogastroenterology. 2014 Jun;61(132):892-6.
9
Common bile duct exploration in an elderly Asian population.老年亚洲人群的胆总管探查术
Int Surg. 2015 Feb;100(2):261-7. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-13-00168.1.
10
Learning curve and outcome of laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis.腹腔镜经胆囊管胆总管探查术治疗胆总管结石的学习曲线和结果。
Br J Surg. 2015 Dec;102(13):1691-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9922. Epub 2015 Sep 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Dilation of the cystic duct confluence in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and stone extraction in patients with secondary choledocholithiasis.继发性胆总管结石患者腹腔镜胆总管探查取石术中胆囊管汇合部扩张情况
BMC Surg. 2020 Mar 17;20(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00705-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Which differences do elderly patients present in single-stage treatment for cholecysto-choledocholithiasis?老年患者在胆囊-胆总管结石病的一期治疗中表现出哪些差异?
Int J Surg. 2014;12 Suppl 2:S160-S163. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.08.358. Epub 2014 Aug 23.
2
Primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus T-tube.腹腔镜胆总管探查术后一期缝合与 T 管引流的比较。
J Surg Res. 2014 Jun 15;189(2):249-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.03.055. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
3
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in elderly patients: is there still a difference?老年患者的腹腔镜胆总管探查术:仍存在差异吗?
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014 Aug;24(4):e118-22. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31829012f6.
4
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure for management of choledocholithiasis: a retrospective analysis and comparison with conventional T-tube drainage.腹腔镜胆总管探查一期缝合治疗胆总管结石:一项回顾性分析及与传统T管引流的比较
Am Surg. 2014 Feb;80(2):178-81.
5
Transcystic approach with micro-incision of the cystic duct and its confluence part in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.腹腔镜胆总管探查术中经胆囊途径行胆囊管及其汇合部微切口手术
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 Dec;23(12):977-81. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0309. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
6
T-tube drainage versus primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.腹腔镜胆总管探查术后T管引流与一期缝合的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 21;2013(6):CD005641. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005641.pub3.
7
Is the end of the T-tube drainage era in laparoscopic choledochotomy for common bile duct stones is coming? A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜胆总管切开取石术(T 管引流)时代是否即将结束?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2013 Jan;257(1):54-66. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318268314b.
8
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for elderly patients: as a first treatment strategy for common bile duct stones.老年患者的腹腔镜胆总管探查术:作为胆总管结石的首选治疗策略
J Korean Surg Soc. 2011 Aug;81(2):128-33. doi: 10.4174/jkss.2011.81.2.128. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
9
To 'gram or not'? Indications for intraoperative cholangiogram.要不要“拍”?术中胆管造影的适应证。
Surgery. 2011 Oct;150(4):810-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.07.062.
10
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a common and potentially hazardous technique that can be avoided.腹腔镜胆囊切除术前行内镜逆行胰胆管造影术:一种常见且有潜在风险的技术,该技术可以避免。
Arch Surg. 2011 Mar;146(3):329-33. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.30.