Yang Xiao-Bin, Xu An-Shu, Li Jian-Gang, Xu Yong-Ping, Xu De-Song, Fu Chao-Chun, Deng Da-Bo, Li Jie, Zhang Ma-Zhong
Department of General Surgery, The First People's Hospital, No. 1 Yuanlin Road, Qujing City, 655000, Yunnan Province, China.
Department of Anesthesiology, The First People's Hospital, No. 1 Yuanlin Road, Qujing City, 655000, Yunnan Province, China.
BMC Surg. 2020 Mar 17;20(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00705-y.
BACKGROUND: Many options exist for the management of cholelithiasis and secondary choledocholithiasis. Among them, laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) with choledocotomy followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy has gained popularity. However, efforts should be made to ensure minimally invasive or noninvasive management of the common bile duct (CBD). The purpose of this study was to explore the clinical experience of non-invasive surgical modality, i.e., laparoscopic transcystic dilation of the cystic duct confluence in CBD exploration (LTD-CBDE), including feasibility, safety, adverse events, and incidence. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, 68 patients were offered the LTD-CBDE technique from December 2015 to April 2018 based on patient's own intention. During the surgery, the cystic duct confluence was dilated with separation forceps and/or a columnar dilation balloon. Subsequently, CBD exploration and stone extraction were performed with a choledochoscope. The entrance of the CBD was covered with a cystic duct stump wall and was subjected to primary closure at the end of surgery. RESULTS: Forty-nine females and 19 males with cholelithiasis and secondary choledocholithiasis were included. The mean age was 53 years old (18 to 72 year). Of these patients, 62 (91.2%) were successfully treated with the LTD-CBDE technique, and bile leakage was observed in 3 patients (4.4%). The mean operation time was 106 min, and the mean hospital stay was 5.9 days. Among the other 6 patients, 3 were converted to open cholecystectomy due to severe fibrosis, unclear anatomical structure at Calot's triangle (n = 2) or Mirizze syndrome (n = 1); LCBDE was performed in 3 patients due to cystic duct atresia (n = 2) and low level of flow from the gallbladder duct into the CBD (n = 1). These patients had a smooth postoperative course. In total, 43/68 of the patients presented no radiological evidence of retained CBD stones at the postoperative follow-up (40 patients treated with LTD-CBDE) 1 year later. CONCLUSIONS: The current work suggests that LTD-CBDE for the management of cholelithiasis and secondary choledocholithiasis is a feasible, safe and effective technique with a low complication rate. LTD-CBDE offers another alternative for surgeons to treat patients in similar scenarios. However, additional randomized, controlled studies are needed to demonstrate its efficacy, safety, and impact on CBD stenosis.
背景:胆结石和继发性胆总管结石的治疗方法有多种。其中,腹腔镜胆总管探查术(LCBDE)联合胆总管切开术并随后行腹腔镜胆囊切除术越来越受欢迎。然而,应努力确保对胆总管(CBD)进行微创或无创治疗。本研究的目的是探讨无创手术方式,即腹腔镜下在胆总管探查术中对胆囊管汇合处进行扩张(LTD-CBDE)的临床经验,包括可行性、安全性、不良事件及发生率。 方法:在这项回顾性分析中,2015年12月至2018年4月期间,根据患者自身意愿,68例患者接受了LTD-CBDE技术。手术过程中,用分离钳和/或柱状扩张球囊扩张胆囊管汇合处。随后,用胆道镜进行胆总管探查和取石。胆总管入口用胆囊管残端壁覆盖,并在手术结束时进行一期缝合。 结果:纳入49例女性和19例男性胆结石及继发性胆总管结石患者。平均年龄53岁(18至72岁)。其中,62例(91.2%)患者通过LTD-CBDE技术成功治疗,3例(4.4%)患者出现胆漏。平均手术时间为106分钟,平均住院时间为5.9天。另外6例患者中,3例因严重纤维化、胆囊三角解剖结构不清(n = 2)或Mirizzi综合征(n = 1)转为开腹胆囊切除术;3例因胆囊管闭锁(n = 2)和胆囊管流入胆总管的流量低(n = 1)行LCBDE。这些患者术后恢复顺利。术后1年随访时,68例患者中有43例(40例接受LTD-CBDE治疗)无胆总管结石残留的影像学证据。 结论:目前的研究表明,LTD-CBDE用于治疗胆结石和继发性胆总管结石是一种可行、安全且有效的技术,并发症发生率低。LTD-CBDE为外科医生在类似情况下治疗患者提供了另一种选择。然而,需要更多的随机对照研究来证明其疗效、安全性以及对胆总管狭窄的影响。
HPB (Oxford). 2017-1
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018-9
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2019-7-25
Surg Endosc. 2003-11
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025-5-27
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2025-4-14
Diseases. 2024-8-26
Front Surg. 2023-1-6
J Perioper Pract. 2019-11
Am J Ophthalmol. 2018-12
BMC Gastroenterol. 2018-3-15
Front Surg. 2016-4-25
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013-12