Suppr超能文献

磁共振子宫输卵管造影在女性不孕症诊断中的应用——与传统子宫输卵管造影的比较:一项随机研究。

Magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in diagnostic work-up of female infertility - comparison with conventional hysterosalpingography: a randomised study.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Archet University Hospital, Nice, France.

Department for Clinical Research and Innovation, University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2019 Feb;29(2):501-508. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5572-2. Epub 2018 Jul 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare diagnostic accuracy of MR-hysterosalpingography (MR-HSG) and conventional hysterosalpingography (X-HSG) in the evaluation of female infertility.

METHODS

Forty women received prospectively both X-HSG, the gold standard technique, and MR-HSG on the same day but the order in which they were conducted was randomised. A 1.5 Tesla MRI was performed with classical sequences for pelvic analysis and an additional 3D T1-weighted sequence with intra-uterine injection of gadolinium. Two radiologists independently interpreted X-HSG and MR-HSG according to randomisation, blinded to the other results. They both then performed a second interpretation of MR-HSG blinded to the first reading with a minimum time delay of 1 week. Diagnostic performance of MR-HSG for analysis of tubal and intracavity abnormalities was evaluated by calculating sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV).

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were included. Diagnostic performance of MR-HSG was: Se: 91.7% (95% CI 61.5-99.8); Sp: 92.9% (95% CI 66.1-99.8) ; PPV: 91.7% (95% CI 61.5-99.8); NPV: 92.9% (95% CI 66.1-99.8). Pain analysis showed a significant statistical difference between the two procedures: average VAS for X-HSG was 4.43 (95% CI 3.50-5.36) versus 3.46 (95% CI 2.62-4.31) for MR-HSG, p=0,01. Intra- and inter-rater agreements for detection of tubal or intracavity abnormalities were 0.92 (95% CI 0.78-1.00) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.52-1.00).

CONCLUSION

MR-HSG is a well-tolerated technique demonstrating high accuracy in investigating tubal patency and intra-uterine abnormalities for diagnostic work-up of female infertility.

KEY POINTS

• MR-hysterosalpingography is an innovative technique. • Hysterosalpingography can be used to investigate tubal patency and intracavity abnormalities. • Hysterosalpingography is a potential 'one-stop-shop' imaging technique for a single comprehensive examination of female infertility.

摘要

目的

比较磁共振子宫输卵管造影术(MR-HSG)和传统子宫输卵管造影术(X-HSG)在女性不孕症评估中的诊断准确性。

方法

40 名女性前瞻性地在同一天接受 X-HSG(金标准技术)和 MR-HSG 检查,但检查顺序是随机的。使用经典的盆腔分析磁共振序列和宫腔内注射钆的额外的 3D T1 加权序列进行 1.5T MRI 检查。两名放射科医生根据随机分组独立解读 X-HSG 和 MR-HSG,对其他结果均不知情。然后,他们在至少 1 周的时间延迟后,对 MR-HSG 进行第二次盲法解读。通过计算敏感性(Se)、特异性(Sp)、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)来评估 MR-HSG 对输卵管和宫腔内异常的分析诊断性能。

结果

共纳入 26 例患者。MR-HSG 的诊断性能为:Se:91.7%(95%CI 61.5-99.8);Sp:92.9%(95%CI 66.1-99.8);PPV:91.7%(95%CI 61.5-99.8);NPV:92.9%(95%CI 66.1-99.8)。疼痛分析显示两种检查方法之间存在显著的统计学差异:X-HSG 的平均视觉模拟评分(VAS)为 4.43(95%CI 3.50-5.36),而 MR-HSG 为 3.46(95%CI 2.62-4.31),p=0.01。检测输卵管或宫腔内异常的内部和内部观察者间的一致性分别为 0.92(95%CI 0.78-1.00)和 0.76(95%CI 0.52-1.00)。

结论

MR-HSG 是一种耐受性良好的技术,在诊断女性不孕症的输卵管通畅性和宫腔内异常方面具有较高的准确性。

关键要点

  1. 磁共振子宫输卵管造影术是一种创新技术。

  2. 子宫输卵管造影术可用于检查输卵管通畅性和宫腔内异常。

  3. 子宫输卵管造影术是一种潜在的“一站式”成像技术,可对女性不孕症进行单一的全面检查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验