Department of Psychology, Harvard University, 33 Kirkland Street, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA.
Department of Psychology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Cleveland, OH, 43403, USA.
J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Nov;47(11):2320-2336. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0888-4. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
Treatment effectiveness has been shown to vary across subgroups of youth based on characteristics such as comorbidity, problem severity, gender, and age. The current study aims to explore if subgroups of youth, identified by applying latent profile analysis to parent-reported symptoms, age, and gender, are better served by specific usual care services. Archival data from a community mental health center were utilized, including parent-reports of symptoms for 953 youth (44.4% female; ages 4-18) across multiple time-points, and services received. Latent profile analysis identified five subgroups including Low Risk, High Risk, Internalizing, Externalizing, and Delinquent/Depressed. The relationship between the intensity level of services and symptoms varied across subgroups. Specifically, high intensity services were related to a greater reduction in symptoms for the Internalizing, Externalizing, and High Risk subgroups. Implications for future developmental research and clinical applications are discussed.
治疗效果已显示出在基于合并症、问题严重程度、性别和年龄等特征的青年亚组之间存在差异。本研究旨在探讨通过对父母报告的症状、年龄和性别进行潜在剖面分析来确定的青年亚组是否可以从特定的常规护理服务中受益更多。利用了一个社区心理健康中心的档案数据,包括来自 953 名青年(44.4%为女性;年龄 4-18 岁)在多个时间点的父母报告的症状和所接受的服务。潜在剖面分析确定了五个亚组,包括低风险、高风险、内化、外化和犯罪/抑郁。服务强度水平与症状之间的关系在亚组之间有所不同。具体来说,高强度服务与内化、外化和高风险亚组的症状减轻更相关。讨论了对未来发展研究和临床应用的影响。